Literature DB >> 23350991

Segmentation of precursor mass range using "tiling" approach increases peptide identifications for MS1-based label-free quantification.

Catherine E Vincent1, Gregory K Potts, Arne Ulbrich, Michael S Westphall, James A Atwood, Joshua J Coon, D Brent Weatherly.   

Abstract

Label-free quantification is a powerful tool for the measurement of protein abundances by mass spectrometric methods. To maximize quantifiable identifications, MS(1)-based methods must balance the collection of survey scans and fragmentation spectra while maintaining reproducible extracted ion chromatograms (XIC). Here we present a method which increases the depth of proteome coverage over replicate data-dependent experiments without the requirement of additional instrument time or sample prefractionation. Sampling depth is increased by restricting precursor selection to a fraction of the full MS(1) mass range for each replicate; collectively, the m/z segments of all replicates encompass the full MS(1) range. Although selection windows are narrowed, full MS(1) spectra are obtained throughout the method, enabling the collection of full mass range MS(1) chromatograms such that label-free quantitation can be performed for any peptide in any experiment. We term this approach "binning" or "tiling" depending on the type of m/z window utilized. By combining the data obtained from each segment, we find that this approach increases the number of quantifiable yeast peptides and proteins by 31% and 52%, respectively, when compared to normal data-dependent experiments performed in replicate.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23350991      PMCID: PMC3607285          DOI: 10.1021/ac303352n

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Anal Chem        ISSN: 0003-2700            Impact factor:   6.986


  29 in total

1.  Towards defining the urinary proteome using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. I. Profiling an unfractionated tryptic digest.

Authors:  C S Spahr; M T Davis; M D McGinley; J H Robinson; E J Bures; J Beierle; J Mort; P L Courchesne; K Chen; R C Wahl; W Yu; R Luethy; S D Patterson
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.984

2.  Towards defining the urinary proteome using liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry. II. Limitations of complex mixture analyses.

Authors:  M T Davis; C S Spahr; M D McGinley; J H Robinson; E J Bures; J Beierle; J Mort; W Yu; R Luethy; S D Patterson
Journal:  Proteomics       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 3.984

3.  Quantification of proteins and metabolites by mass spectrometry without isotopic labeling or spiked standards.

Authors:  Weixun Wang; Haihong Zhou; Hua Lin; Sushmita Roy; Thomas A Shaler; Lander R Hill; Scott Norton; Praveen Kumar; Markus Anderle; Christopher H Becker
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-09-15       Impact factor: 6.986

4.  Identification and relative quantitation of protein mixtures by enzymatic digestion followed by capillary reversed-phase liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Pavel V Bondarenko; Dirk Chelius; Thomas A Shaler
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2002-09-15       Impact factor: 6.986

Review 5.  Trends in ultrasensitive proteomics.

Authors:  A F Maarten Altelaar; Albert J R Heck
Journal:  Curr Opin Chem Biol       Date:  2012-01-07       Impact factor: 8.822

6.  Approaching complete peroxisome characterization by gas-phase fractionation.

Authors:  Eugene C Yi; Marcello Marelli; Hookeun Lee; Samuel O Purvine; Ruedi Aebersold; John D Aitchison; David R Goodlett
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2002-09       Impact factor: 3.535

7.  Quantitative profiling of proteins in complex mixtures using liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Dirk Chelius; Pavel V Bondarenko
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2002 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 4.466

8.  Evaluation of multidimensional chromatography coupled with tandem mass spectrometry (LC/LC-MS/MS) for large-scale protein analysis: the yeast proteome.

Authors:  Junmin Peng; Joshua E Elias; Carson C Thoreen; Larry J Licklider; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 4.466

Review 9.  Biomedical applications of two-dimensional electrophoresis using immobilized pH gradients: current status.

Authors:  S M Hanash
Journal:  Electrophoresis       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.535

10.  Global protein identification and quantification technology using two-dimensional liquid chromatography nanospray mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Dirk Chelius; Terry Zhang; Guanghui Wang; Rong-Fong Shen
Journal:  Anal Chem       Date:  2003-12-01       Impact factor: 6.986

View more
  9 in total

1.  DeMix-Q: Quantification-Centered Data Processing Workflow.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Lukas Käll; Roman A Zubarev
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2016-01-04       Impact factor: 5.911

2.  Neutron-encoded protein quantification by peptide carbamylation.

Authors:  Arne Ulbrich; Anna E Merrill; Alexander S Hebert; Michael S Westphall; Mark P Keller; Alan D Attie; Joshua J Coon
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2013-10-29       Impact factor: 3.109

3.  Parallel Notched Gas-Phase Enrichment for Improved Proteome Identification and Quantification with Fast Spectral Acquisition Rates.

Authors:  Brian K Erickson; Devin K Schweppe; Qing Yu; Ramin Rad; Wilhem Haas; Graeme C McAlister; Steven P Gygi
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2020-02-17       Impact factor: 4.466

4.  Pivotal role of computers and software in mass spectrometry - SEQUEST and 20 years of tandem MS database searching.

Authors:  John R Yates
Journal:  J Am Soc Mass Spectrom       Date:  2015-08-19       Impact factor: 3.109

5.  Phosphorylation at the homotypic interface regulates nucleoprotein oligomerization and assembly of the influenza virus replication machinery.

Authors:  Arindam Mondal; Gregory K Potts; Anthony R Dawson; Joshua J Coon; Andrew Mehle
Journal:  PLoS Pathog       Date:  2015-04-13       Impact factor: 6.823

6.  Systematic optimization of long gradient chromatography mass spectrometry for deep analysis of brain proteome.

Authors:  Hong Wang; Yanling Yang; Yuxin Li; Bing Bai; Xusheng Wang; Haiyan Tan; Tao Liu; Thomas G Beach; Junmin Peng; Zhiping Wu
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2014-12-12       Impact factor: 4.466

7.  Influenza virus recruits host protein kinase C to control assembly and activity of its replication machinery.

Authors:  Arindam Mondal; Anthony R Dawson; Gregory K Potts; Elyse C Freiberger; Steven F Baker; Lindsey A Moser; Kristen A Bernard; Joshua J Coon; Andrew Mehle
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-07-31       Impact factor: 8.140

8.  Covariation of Peptide Abundances Accurately Reflects Protein Concentration Differences.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Mohammad Pirmoradian; Roman Zubarev; Lukas Käll
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 5.911

9.  DeMix workflow for efficient identification of cofragmented peptides in high resolution data-dependent tandem mass spectrometry.

Authors:  Bo Zhang; Mohammad Pirmoradian; Alexey Chernobrovkin; Roman A Zubarev
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2014-08-06       Impact factor: 5.911

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.