BACKGROUND: As the presence of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) affects the accuracy of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) analysis methods, HbA1c measurement may not be a good indicator for patients with neonatal diabetes mellitus, whereas glycated albumin (GA) may be a good indicator. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether total glycated hemoglobin (GHb) or HbF-adjusted HbA1c (adj-HbA1c) can act as a glycemic control marker in infants. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Plasma glucose (PG), GA, HbF, GHb measured using the affinity method, and HbA1c measured using the latex-immunoturbidimetry (LA) or the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods were determined in 26 full-term newborn infants aged 4-234 d. Adj-HbA1c was calculated as HbA1c/(total Hb - HbF). RESULTS: GHb, adj-HbA1c measured using the LA and the HPLC methods were 4.8 ± 0.5%, 4.5 ± 0.5%, and 4.7 ± 0.6%, respectively. GA was most positively correlated with PG (r = 0.696, p < 0.0001). GHb was positively correlated with both PG (r = 0.479, p = 0.013) and GA (r = 0.727, p < 0.0001). Adj-HbA1c measured using the LA method was positively correlated with GA (r = 0.465, p = 0.017), but not PG (r = 0.304, p = 0.132). Adj-HbA1c measured using the HPLC method was correlated with neither PG (r = -0.077, p = 0.710) nor GA (r = 0.360, p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: GHb measured using the affinity method may be a useful glycemic control marker in infants. Although adj-HbA1c measured using the LA method was correlated with GA, it may not be a practical measure because it was not correlated with PG and determining HbF levels using HPLC method can be troublesome. Adj-HbA1c measured using the HPLC method should not be used as a glycemic marker in infants.
BACKGROUND: As the presence of fetal hemoglobin (HbF) affects the accuracy of hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) analysis methods, HbA1c measurement may not be a good indicator for patients with neonatal diabetes mellitus, whereas glycated albumin (GA) may be a good indicator. OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether total glycated hemoglobin (GHb) or HbF-adjusted HbA1c (adj-HbA1c) can act as a glycemic control marker in infants. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Plasma glucose (PG), GA, HbF, GHb measured using the affinity method, and HbA1c measured using the latex-immunoturbidimetry (LA) or the high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) methods were determined in 26 full-term newborn infants aged 4-234 d. Adj-HbA1c was calculated as HbA1c/(total Hb - HbF). RESULTS: GHb, adj-HbA1c measured using the LA and the HPLC methods were 4.8 ± 0.5%, 4.5 ± 0.5%, and 4.7 ± 0.6%, respectively. GA was most positively correlated with PG (r = 0.696, p < 0.0001). GHb was positively correlated with both PG (r = 0.479, p = 0.013) and GA (r = 0.727, p < 0.0001). Adj-HbA1c measured using the LA method was positively correlated with GA (r = 0.465, p = 0.017), but not PG (r = 0.304, p = 0.132). Adj-HbA1c measured using the HPLC method was correlated with neither PG (r = -0.077, p = 0.710) nor GA (r = 0.360, p = 0.071). CONCLUSIONS: GHb measured using the affinity method may be a useful glycemic control marker in infants. Although adj-HbA1c measured using the LA method was correlated with GA, it may not be a practical measure because it was not correlated with PG and determining HbF levels using HPLC method can be troublesome. Adj-HbA1c measured using the HPLC method should not be used as a glycemic marker in infants.
Authors: Brian W Thurber; David Carmody; Elizabeth C Tadie; Ashley N Pastore; Jazzmyne T Dickens; Kristen E Wroblewski; Rochelle N Naylor; Louis H Philipson; Siri Atma W Greeley Journal: Diabetologia Date: 2015-04-17 Impact factor: 10.122