Literature DB >> 23350633

Survival of patients with Stage III colon cancer is improved in hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer compared with sporadic cases. A Danish registry based study.

L M Brixen1, I T Bernstein, S Bülow, E Ehrnrooth.   

Abstract

AIM: Patients with hereditary non-polyposis colorectal cancer (HNPCC) seem to have a better prognosis than those with sporadic colorectal cancer (CRC). The aim was to compare survival after Stage III CC in patients with HNPCC with those having sporadic CC.
METHOD: A total of 230 patients with hereditary cancer from the Danish HNPCC Register and 3557 patients with sporadic CC from the Danish Colorectal Cancer Database, diagnosed during May 2001-December 2008, were included. HNPCC patients were classified according to mismatch repair mutation status and family pedigree. Sporadic cases had no known family history of cancer. Patient characteristics, geographical differences and survival data were analysed.
RESULTS: The overall survival (OS) was better in HNPCC patients compared with sporadic CC after stratification for sex and age (P = 0.02; CI 1.04-1.7). The 5-year survival was 70% in HNPCC patients compared with 56% in sporadic CC (P < 0.001). No survival difference was found between HNPCC subgroups but a tendency to better OS was seen in patients with Lynch syndrome. No geographical differences in OS were found. The median follow-up was 3.9 (0-9.5) years for HNPCC vs 3.2 (0-9.6) years for sporadic CC.
CONCLUSION: HNPCC patients with Stage III CC have a better OS compared with sporadic CC. No significant difference in OS was found within HNPCC subgroups. Colorectal Disease
© 2013 The Association of Coloproctology of Great Britain and Ireland.

Entities:  

Keywords:  HNPCC; Hereditary colon cancer; colon cancer Stage III; national registers; survival

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23350633     DOI: 10.1111/codi.12150

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Colorectal Dis        ISSN: 1462-8910            Impact factor:   3.788


  5 in total

1.  Family history of colorectal cancer is not associated with colorectal cancer survival regardless of microsatellite instability status.

Authors:  Amanda I Phipps; Dennis J Ahnen; Peter T Campbell; Aung Ko Win; Mark A Jenkins; Noralane M Lindor; Robert Gryfe; John D Potter; Polly A Newcomb
Journal:  Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev       Date:  2014-06-02       Impact factor: 4.254

2.  Molecular pathological epidemiology gives clues to paradoxical findings.

Authors:  Reiko Nishihara; Tyler J VanderWeele; Kenji Shibuya; Murray A Mittleman; Molin Wang; Alison E Field; Edward Giovannucci; Paul Lochhead; Shuji Ogino
Journal:  Eur J Epidemiol       Date:  2015-10-07       Impact factor: 8.082

3.  Clinicopathological Features and Type of Surgery for Lynch Syndrome: Changes during the Past Two Decades.

Authors:  Il Tae Son; Duck-Woo Kim; Seung-Yong Jeong; Young-Kyoung Shin; Myong Hoon Ihn; Heung-Kwon Oh; Sung-Bum Kang; Kyu Joo Park; Jae Hwan Oh; Ja-Lok Ku; Jae-Gahb Park
Journal:  Cancer Res Treat       Date:  2015-05-26       Impact factor: 4.679

4.  Evaluating many treatments and biomarkers in oncology: a new design.

Authors:  Richard Kaplan; Timothy Maughan; Angela Crook; David Fisher; Richard Wilson; Louise Brown; Mahesh Parmar
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-11-18       Impact factor: 44.544

5.  Polyposis and Oncologic Outcomes in Young-onset Sporadic Colorectal Cancer.

Authors:  Ulas Aday; Mehmet T Kafadar; Abdullah Oğuz; Mehmet V Bahadir; Baran Demir; Faik V Akpulat; Baris Gulturk; Abdullah Böyük
Journal:  Euroasian J Hepatogastroenterol       Date:  2021 Jan-Jun
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.