Literature DB >> 23350589

Block allograft technique versus standard guided bone regeneration: a randomized clinical trial.

Leonardo Amorfini1, Marco Migliorati, Alessio Signori, Armando Silvestrini-Biavati, Stefano Benedicenti.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The aim of this randomized clinical trial was to compare the potential of deproteinized bovine bone added to autologous bone or corticocancellous allograft block with or without the addition of recombinant human platelet-derived growth factor-BB (rhPDGF-BB) to regenerate mandibular atrophic ridges. TRIAL
DESIGN: parallel, allocation ratio of 1:1 using a split-mouth model. Eligibility criteria for patients: adult patients; bilateral atrophic edentulous areas in the posterior area of the mandible; a preoperatory cone beam computed tomography scan; and absence of systemic diseases affecting the bone metabolism. Bone graft intervention for control group consisted of bone chips collected with a scraper mixed with deproteinized bovine bone covered with a resorbable membrane. Bone graft intervention for test group consisted of a corticocancellous allograft block, shaped before surgery, and protected with a collagen membrane. In addition, both groups received rhPDGF-BB or a saline solution as control. As primary outcome quantity, bone variation after a 1-year healing period was considered. A p-value of.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: Sixteen patients were enrolled in this trial. A total of 50 implants and 32 bone grafts were placed. All patients concluded the study (no dropouts). Change at 1 year in bone volume was not significantly different between the two groups (p-value = .25). Effect of treatment in terms of change in bone volume at 1 year was not significant (p-value = .89) when saline solution was used while was at limit of significance when rhPDGF-BB was used (p-value = .052). After 1 year, all the implants were successfully integrated.
CONCLUSIONS: The block allograft and the standard regenerative procedure showed similar results in terms of regenerated bone volume after 1 year of functional loading. The rhPDGF-BB positively influenced soft-tissue healing.
© 2013 Wiley Periodicals, Inc.

Entities:  

Keywords:  allograft; augmentation; bone graft; dental implant; guided surgery; resorption

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23350589     DOI: 10.1111/cid.12040

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Implant Dent Relat Res        ISSN: 1523-0899            Impact factor:   3.932


  10 in total

Review 1.  Guided bone regeneration: materials and biological mechanisms revisited.

Authors:  Ibrahim Elgali; Omar Omar; Christer Dahlin; Peter Thomsen
Journal:  Eur J Oral Sci       Date:  2017-08-19       Impact factor: 2.612

2.  Growth Factors in Oral Tissue Engineering: New Perspectives and Current Therapeutic Options.

Authors:  Luca Fiorillo; Gabriele Cervino; Pablo Galindo-Moreno; Alan Scott Herford; Gianrico Spagnuolo; Marco Cicciù
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2021-01-06       Impact factor: 3.411

3.  Guided Bone Regeneration in the Edentulous Atrophic Maxilla Using Deproteinized Bovine Bone Mineral (DBBM) Combined with Platelet-Rich Fibrin (PRF)-A Prospective Study.

Authors:  João Manuel Mendez Caramês; Filipe Araújo Vieira; Gonçalo Bártolo Caramês; Ana Catarina Pinto; Helena Cristina Oliveira Francisco; Duarte Nuno da Silva Marques
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-02-08       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Horizontal augmentation techniques in the mandible: a systematic review.

Authors:  Ralf Smeets; Levi Matthies; Peter Windisch; Martin Gosau; Ronald Jung; Nadine Brodala; Martina Stefanini; Johannes Kleinheinz; Michael Payer; Anders Henningsen; Bilal Al-Nawas; Christian Knipfer
Journal:  Int J Implant Dent       Date:  2022-05-09

5.  Lateral Alveolar Ridge Augmentation with Autologous Dentin of Periodontally Compromised Teeth: A Retrospective Study.

Authors:  Michael Korsch; Marco Peichl; Andreas Bartols
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2022-04-10       Impact factor: 4.614

Review 6.  Bone Grafts and Substitutes in Dentistry: A Review of Current Trends and Developments.

Authors:  Rusin Zhao; Ruijia Yang; Paul R Cooper; Zohaib Khurshid; Amin Shavandi; Jithendra Ratnayake
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2021-05-18       Impact factor: 4.411

7.  Comparison of allogeneic and autogenous bone grafts for augmentation of alveolar ridge defects-A 12-month retrospective radiographic evaluation.

Authors:  Frank R Kloss; Vincent Offermanns; Anita Kloss-Brandstätter
Journal:  Clin Oral Implants Res       Date:  2018-10-31       Impact factor: 5.977

8.  Accuracy assessment of a novel semiautomatic method evaluating bone grafts around the dental implant: an in vitro and ex vivo study.

Authors:  Jun-Yu Shi; Yuan Li; Long-Fei Zhuang; Xiao Zhang; Ling-Feng Fan; Hong-Chang Lai
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2020-09-10       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Recombinant Human Platelet-Derived Growth Factor: A Systematic Review of Clinical Findings in Oral Regenerative Procedures.

Authors:  L Tavelli; A Ravidà; S Barootchi; L Chambrone; W V Giannobile
Journal:  JDR Clin Trans Res       Date:  2020-05-11

Review 10.  Survival Rates of Dental Implants in Autogenous and Allogeneic Bone Blocks: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Phil Donkiewicz; Korbinian Benz; Anita Kloss-Brandstätter; Jochen Jackowski
Journal:  Medicina (Kaunas)       Date:  2021-12-20       Impact factor: 2.430

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.