Literature DB >> 23350573

Outcome from consecutive ICSI cycles in patients treated with recombinant human LH and those supplemented with urinary hCG-based LH activity during controlled ovarian stimulation in the long GnRH-agonist protocol.

Francisco Fábregues1, Montserrat Creus, Gemma Casals, Francisco Carmona, Juan Balasch.   

Abstract

Clinical results were compared in a well-established, assisted reproduction program during the cross-over from highly purified (HP)-human menopausal gonadotropin (hMG) to rhFSH/rhLH. We included the last 33 patients treated with HP-hMG and the first 33 patients receiving rhFSH/rhLH for ovarian stimulation in their first intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycle. Patient baseline characteristics were almost identical in the two groups. Ovarian stimulation characteristics (days of stimulation, total amount of FSH administered using a modest initial loading dose of 150 IU/d, patients with oocyte retrieval) were similar for the two groups. However, the number of total and leading follicles and E2 serum levels on the human chorionic gonadotropin injection day were significantly higher in the rhFSH/rhLH group. The oocyte yield was significantly higher in the rhFSH/rhLH group as well as the number of metaphase II oocytes, difference almost reaching the statistical significance. The number of oocytes fertilized was also higher in patients receiving rhFSH/rhLH treatment. Implantation and clinical pregnancy rates were similar in both the study groups. It is concluded that in women undergoing controlled ovarian hyperstimulation under pituitary suppression for ART, the recombinant combined product containing FSH and LH in a fixed 2:1 ratio is more effective than HP-hMG in terms of follicle development, oocyte yield and quality, and fertilization rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23350573     DOI: 10.3109/09513590.2012.754873

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Gynecol Endocrinol        ISSN: 0951-3590            Impact factor:   2.260


  6 in total

1.  Retrospective analysis of treatments with recombinant FSH and recombinant LH versus human menopausal gonadotropin in women with reduced ovarian reserve.

Authors:  Mario Mignini Renzini; Claudio Brigante; Giovanni Coticchio; Mariabeatrice Dal Canto; Ilaria Caliari; Ruggero Comi; Elena De Ponti; Rubens Fadini
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2017-09-04       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  Clinical outcomes following long GnRHa ovarian stimulation with highly purified human menopausal gonadotropin plus rFSH or rFSH in patients undergoing in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer: a multi-center randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Li Shu; Qianhua Xu; Qingxia Meng; Xue Dai; Yun Zhang; Wei Zhou; Honggang Yi; Jinyong Liu; Chunxiang Wu; Zhen Hou; Yugui Cui; Tin Chiu Li; Jiayin Liu
Journal:  Ann Transl Med       Date:  2019-04

3.  Controlled Ovarian Stimulation with recombinant-FSH plus recombinant-LH vs. human Menopausal Gonadotropin based on the number of retrieved oocytes: results from a routine clinical practice in a real-life population.

Authors:  Alberto Revelli; Grazia Pettinau; Gemma Basso; Andrea Carosso; Alessandro Ferrero; Cecilia Dallan; Stefano Canosa; Gianluca Gennarelli; Daniela Guidetti; Claudia Filippini; Chiara Benedetto
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2015-07-25       Impact factor: 5.211

4.  Controlled ovarian stimulation with r-FSH plus r-LH vs. HMG plus r-FSH in patients candidate for IVF/ICSI cycles: An RCT.

Authors:  Ensieh Shahrokh Tehraninejad; Mina Farshbaf Taghinejad; Batool Hossein Rashidi; Fedyeh Haghollahi
Journal:  Int J Reprod Biomed       Date:  2017-07

Review 5.  Luteinizing hormone supplementation in women with hypogonadotropic hypogonadism seeking fertility care: Insights from a narrative review.

Authors:  Noemi Di Segni; Andrea Busnelli; Matteo Secchi; Federico Cirillo; Paolo Emanuele Levi-Setti
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2022-08-01       Impact factor: 6.055

Review 6.  A review of luteinising hormone and human chorionic gonadotropin when used in assisted reproductive technology.

Authors:  Diego Ezcurra; Peter Humaidan
Journal:  Reprod Biol Endocrinol       Date:  2014-10-03       Impact factor: 5.211

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.