Literature DB >> 23349556

Shoulder function after selective and superselective neck dissections: clinical and functional outcomes.

L Giordano1, D Sarandria, B Fabiano, U Del Carro, M Bussi.   

Abstract

The aim of this work is to assess the clinical and functional outcome of patients who underwent different types of neck dissection, with special regards to the spinal accessory nerve, trapezius muscle and shoulder function. From February 2008 to July 2010, we evaluated 17 cases of neck dissection in patients affected by laryngeal carcinoma clinically staged N0. We performed selective neck dissection (IIA-IIBIII- IV) in 11 cases (group A) and superselective neck dissection in 6 cases (group B). All patients underwent clinical examination before surgery to evaluate shoulder function. They also underwent functional evaluation of the spinal accessory nerve through electromyography (study of muscular activity) and electroneurography (study of motor action potential). Patients were evaluated before surgery (T0), 8 days after surgery (T1) and 21 days after surgery (T2). In all cases, at the end of surgery it was possible to assess the integrity of the spinal accessory nerve. The average value of the MAP was 13.06 in group A and 10.98 in group B at T0. Eight days after surgery (T1) the value of MAP was reduced to 1.35 in group A and 6.15 in group B. Electromyography evaluation showed signs of denervation in 6 cases in group A and in 2 cases in group B. Voluntary activity was not detectable in 6 cases in group A, while it was present, even if reduced, in all cases in group B. At 21 days after surgery (T2), we found a value of MAP of 1.03 in group A and 6.43 in group B. Electromyography showed signs of denervation in 10 patients in group A and in 3 cases in group B. Voluntary activity was not detectable in 10 cases in group A, while it was present in all cases in group B. The arm abduction test was 2.5 in group A and 4.0 in group B. Neck dissection quality of life questionnaire showed a value of 24.17 in group A and a value of 25.5 in group B. Our data thus confirm that surgical manipulation of the nerve may be associated with severe impairment of nerve conduction when sublevel IIB is involved in the dissection.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Neck dissection; Shoulder disability; Spinal accessory nerve dysfunction

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23349556      PMCID: PMC3552537     

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital        ISSN: 0392-100X            Impact factor:   2.124


  11 in total

1.  Impact of neck dissection on quality of life.

Authors:  A L Kuntz; E A Weymuller
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 3.325

2.  Objective comparison of shoulder dysfunction after three neck dissection techniques.

Authors:  P T Cheng; S P Hao; Y H Lin; A R Yeh
Journal:  Ann Otol Rhinol Laryngol       Date:  2000-08       Impact factor: 1.547

Review 3.  Neck treatment and shoulder morbidity: still a challenge.

Authors:  Patrick J Bradley; Alfio Ferlito; Carl E Silver; Robert P Takes; Julia A Woolgar; Primož Strojan; Carlos Suárez; Hakan Coskun; Peter Zbären; Alessandra Rinaldo
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2010-10-19       Impact factor: 3.147

4.  Cervical sensory preservation during neck dissection.

Authors:  Jong-Lyel Roh; Yeo-Hoon Yoon; Sang Yoon Kim; Chan Il Park
Journal:  Oral Oncol       Date:  2006-09-18       Impact factor: 5.337

5.  Spinal accessory nerve preservation during neck dissection.

Authors:  D W Eisele; E A Weymuller; J C Price
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  1991-04       Impact factor: 3.325

6.  Shoulder function in patients undergoing selective neck dissection with or without radiation and chemotherapy.

Authors:  Jeremy P Watkins; Glenn B Williams; Anthony A Mascioli; Jim Y Wan; Sandeep Samant
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2010-11-10       Impact factor: 3.147

7.  Shoulder disability after different selective neck dissections (levels II-IV versus levels II-V): a comparative study.

Authors:  Johnny Cappiello; Cesare Piazza; Marco Giudice; Giovanni De Maria; Piero Nicolai
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2005-02       Impact factor: 3.325

8.  Shoulder and neck morbidity in quality of life after surgery for head and neck cancer.

Authors:  C P van Wilgen; P U Dijkstra; B F A M van der Laan; J Th Plukker; J L N Roodenburg
Journal:  Head Neck       Date:  2004-10       Impact factor: 3.147

Review 9.  Management of the N0 neck in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Allen Cheng; Brian L Schmidt
Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 2.802

10.  The 11th nerve syndrome. Accessory nerve palsy or adhesive capsulitis?

Authors:  C Patten; A D Hillel
Journal:  Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg       Date:  1993-02
View more
  10 in total

1.  The impact on post-operative shoulder function of intraoperative nerve monitoring of cranial nerve XI during modified radical neck dissection.

Authors:  Boštjan Lanišnik; Lidija Žitnik; Primož Levart; Miha Žargi; Zoran Rodi
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2016-05-26       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Nerve and vein preserving neck dissections for oral cancers: a prospective evaluation of spinal accessory nerve function and internal jugular vein patency following treatment.

Authors:  G R Kumar Reddy; N Hulikal; A Y Lakshmi; B Vengamma
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-10-31       Impact factor: 2.124

Review 3.  Frozen shoulder.

Authors:  Neal L Millar; Adam Meakins; Filip Struyf; Elaine Willmore; Abigail L Campbell; Paul D Kirwan; Moeed Akbar; Laura Moore; Jonathan C Ronquillo; George A C Murrell; Scott A Rodeo
Journal:  Nat Rev Dis Primers       Date:  2022-09-08       Impact factor: 65.038

4.  Determinants for further wishes for cosmetic and reconstructive interventions in 1652 patients with surgical treated carcinomas of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Henrik Holtmann; Simon Spalthoff; Nils-Claudius Gellrich; Jörg Handschel; Julian Lommen; Norbert R Kübler; Gertrud Krüskemper; Majeed Rana; Karoline Sander
Journal:  Maxillofac Plast Reconstr Surg       Date:  2017-09-05

5.  Results of a randomized controlled trial of level IIb preserving neck dissection in clinically node-negative squamous carcinoma of the oral cavity.

Authors:  Manoj Pandey; Senniappan Karthikeyan; Deepika Joshi; Mohan Kumar; Mridula Shukla
Journal:  World J Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-11-08       Impact factor: 2.754

6.  Clinical analysis of neck node metastasis in oral cavity cancer.

Authors:  Aditi Sharma; Jin-Wook Kim; Jun-Young Paeng
Journal:  J Korean Assoc Oral Maxillofac Surg       Date:  2018-12-28

7.  Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Predicting Occult Nodal Metastasis in Early-Stage Oral Cavity Squamous Cell Carcinoma.

Authors:  Nathan Farrokhian; Andrew J Holcomb; Erin Dimon; Omar Karadaghy; Christina Ward; Erin Whiteford; Claire Tolan; Elyse K Hanly; Marisa R Buchakjian; Brette Harding; Laura Dooley; Justin Shinn; C Burton Wood; Sarah L Rohde; Sobia Khaja; Anuraag Parikh; Mustafa G Bulbul; Joseph Penn; Sara Goodwin; Andrés M Bur
Journal:  JAMA Netw Open       Date:  2022-04-01

8.  Cervical level IIb metastases in squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yurong Kou; Tengfei Zhao; Shaohui Huang; Jie Liu; Weiyi Duan; Yunjing Wang; Zechen Wang; Delong Li; Chunliu Ning; Changfu Sun
Journal:  Onco Targets Ther       Date:  2017-09-11       Impact factor: 4.147

9.  Spinal accessory nerve preservation in modified neck dissections: surgical and functional outcomes.

Authors:  V Popovski; A Benedetti; D Popovic-Monevska; A Grcev; A Stamatoski; J Zhivadinovik
Journal:  Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital       Date:  2017-10       Impact factor: 2.124

10.  Predictive modelling of level IIb lymph node metastasis in oral squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Hyunwoo Yang; Nak-Hoon Son; Sung Hwa Lee; Dongwook Kim; Hyung Jun Kim; In-Ho Cha; Woong Nam
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-09-02       Impact factor: 4.379

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.