Literature DB >> 23349415

Towards evidence-based emergency medicine: best BETs from the Manchester Royal Infirmary. BET 1: Cricoid pressure in emergency rapid sequence induction.

John Butler1, Ayan Sen.   

Abstract

A short-cut review was carried out to establish whether the application of cricoid pressure during the induction of general anaesthesia reduced the incidence of regurgitation and aspiration of gastric contents. One good quality review article, two studies and two abstracts provided the best evidence to answer the clinical question. The authors, date and country of publication, patient group studied, study type, relevant outcomes, results and study weaknesses of these best papers are tabulated (table 1). It is concluded that although there is a theoretical advantage to providing cricoid pressure during induction, there is little evidence of any benefit at this time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23349415     DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2012-202190.2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Emerg Med J        ISSN: 1472-0205            Impact factor:   2.740


  4 in total

Review 1.  Acute Intraoperative Pulmonary Aspiration.

Authors:  Katie S Nason
Journal:  Thorac Surg Clin       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.750

2.  Rapid sequence intubation: What does it mean? Does it really matter?

Authors:  Joseph D Tobias
Journal:  Saudi J Anaesth       Date:  2014-04

3.  Management of pulmonary aspiration due to undiagnosed achalasia during induction of general anesthesia - A case report.

Authors:  Hee Jung Kim; Yong Seon Choi; Jeong Hyun Jin; Bora Lee
Journal:  Anesth Pain Med (Seoul)       Date:  2022-03-08

Review 4.  Effectiveness and risks of cricoid pressure during rapid sequence induction for endotracheal intubation.

Authors:  Catherine M Algie; Robert K Mahar; Hannah B Tan; Greer Wilson; Patrick D Mahar; Jason Wasiak
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-11-18
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.