OBJECTIVE: To: (1) provide a review of knowledge transfer (KT) and related concepts; (2) look at the impact of traditional and emerging KT strategies on concussion knowledge and education; (3) discuss the value and impact of KT to organisations and concussion-related decision making and (4) make recommendations for the future of concussion education. DESIGN: Qualitative literature review of KT and concussion education literature. INTERVENTION: PubMed, Medline and Sport Discus databases were reviewed and an internet search was conducted. The literature search was restricted to articles published in the English language, but not restricted to any particular years. Altogether, 67 journal articles, 21 websites, 1 book and 1 report were reviewed. RESULTS: The value of KT as part of concussion education is increasingly becoming recognised. Target audiences benefit from specific learning strategies. Concussion tools exist, but their effectiveness and impact require further evaluation. The media is valuable in drawing attention to concussion, but efforts need to ensure that the public is aware of the right information. Social media as a concussion education tool is becoming more prominent. Implementation of KT models is one approach which organisations can use to assess knowledge gaps; identify, develop and evaluate education strategies and use the outcomes to facilitate decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing KT strategies requires a defined plan. Identifying the needs, learning styles and preferred learning strategies of target audiences, coupled with evaluation, should be a piece of the overall concussion education puzzle to have an impact on enhancing knowledge and awareness.
OBJECTIVE: To: (1) provide a review of knowledge transfer (KT) and related concepts; (2) look at the impact of traditional and emerging KT strategies on concussion knowledge and education; (3) discuss the value and impact of KT to organisations and concussion-related decision making and (4) make recommendations for the future of concussion education. DESIGN: Qualitative literature review of KT and concussion education literature. INTERVENTION: PubMed, Medline and Sport Discus databases were reviewed and an internet search was conducted. The literature search was restricted to articles published in the English language, but not restricted to any particular years. Altogether, 67 journal articles, 21 websites, 1 book and 1 report were reviewed. RESULTS: The value of KT as part of concussion education is increasingly becoming recognised. Target audiences benefit from specific learning strategies. Concussion tools exist, but their effectiveness and impact require further evaluation. The media is valuable in drawing attention to concussion, but efforts need to ensure that the public is aware of the right information. Social media as a concussion education tool is becoming more prominent. Implementation of KT models is one approach which organisations can use to assess knowledge gaps; identify, develop and evaluate education strategies and use the outcomes to facilitate decision-making. CONCLUSIONS: Implementing KT strategies requires a defined plan. Identifying the needs, learning styles and preferred learning strategies of target audiences, coupled with evaluation, should be a piece of the overall concussion education puzzle to have an impact on enhancing knowledge and awareness.
Authors: Alex Donaldson; Joshua Newton; Paul McCrory; Peta White; Gavin Davis; Michael Makdissi; Caroline F Finch Journal: Am J Lifestyle Med Date: 2014-06-19
Authors: Roger Zemek; Kaylee Eady; Katherine Moreau; Ken J Farion; Beverly Solomon; Margaret Weiser; Carol Dematteo Journal: Paediatr Child Health Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 2.253
Authors: Brad G Kurowski; Wendy J Pomerantz; Courtney Schaiper; Mona Ho; Michael A Gittelman Journal: J Trauma Acute Care Surg Date: 2015-09 Impact factor: 3.313
Authors: Paul S Echlin; Andrew M Johnson; Jeffrey D Holmes; Annalise Tichenoff; Sarah Gray; Heather Gatavackas; Joanne Walsh; Tim Middlebro; Angelique Blignaut; Martin MacIntyre; Chris Anderson; Eli Fredman; Michael Mayinger; Elaine N Skopelja; Takeshi Sasaki; Sylvain Bouix; Ofer Pasternak; Karl G Helmer; Inga K Koerte; Martha E Shenton; Lorie A Forwell Journal: J Neurosurg Date: 2014-10-03 Impact factor: 5.115
Authors: Johna K Register-Mihalik; Richelle M Williams; Stephen W Marshall; Laura A Linnan; Jason P Mihalik; Kevin M Guskiewicz; Tamara C Valovich McLeod Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2018-09-10 Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Anne W Hunt; Luciano De Feo; Jennifer Macintyre; Dayna Greenspoon; Talia Dick; Katherine Mah; Melissa Paniccia; Christine Provvidenza; Nick Reed Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-08-17 Impact factor: 2.655