Literature DB >> 23349119

One size does not fit all: investigating doctors' stated preference heterogeneity for job incentives to inform policy in Thailand.

Mylene Lagarde1, Nonglak Pagaiya, Viroj Tangcharoensathian, Duane Blaauw.   

Abstract

This study investigates heterogeneity in Thai doctors' job preferences at the beginning of their career, with a view to inform the design of effective policies to retain them in rural areas. A discrete choice experiment was designed and administered to 198 young doctors. We analysed the data using several specifications of a random parameter model to account for various sources of preference heterogeneity. By modelling preference heterogeneity, we showed how sensitivity to different incentives varied in different sections of the population. In particular, doctors from rural backgrounds were more sensitive than others to a 45% salary increase and having a post near their home province, but they were less sensitive to a reduction in the number of on-call nights. On the basis of the model results, the effects of two types of interventions were simulated: introducing various incentives and modifying the population structure. The results of the simulations provide multiple elements for consideration for policy-makers interested in designing effective interventions. They also underline the interest of modelling preference heterogeneity carefully.
Copyright © 2013 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Keywords:  Thailand; discrete choice experiments; doctors; job preferences; preference heterogeneity; random parameter logit model

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23349119     DOI: 10.1002/hec.2897

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Econ        ISSN: 1057-9230            Impact factor:   3.046


  9 in total

1.  Junior doctors' medical specialty and practice location choice: simulating policies to overcome regional inequalities.

Authors:  Pedro Ramos; Hélio Alves; Paulo Guimarães; Maria A Ferreira
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2016-11-03

2.  Improving allocative efficiency from network consolidation: a solution for the health workforce shortage.

Authors:  Theepakorn Jithitikulchai
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2022-07-15

Review 3.  Quality of care provided by mid-level health workers: systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Zohra S Lassi; Giorgio Cometto; Luis Huicho; Zulfiqar A Bhutta
Journal:  Bull World Health Organ       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 9.408

4.  Heterogeneity in general practitioners' preferences for quality improvement programs: a choice experiment and policy simulation in France.

Authors:  Mehdi Ammi; Christine Peyron
Journal:  Health Econ Rev       Date:  2016-09-15

5.  The use of specialty training to retain doctors in Malawi: A discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Kate L Mandeville; Godwin Ulaya; Mylène Lagarde; Adamson S Muula; Titha Dzowela; Kara Hanson
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2016-09-24       Impact factor: 4.634

6.  Discrete Choice Experiments in Health Economics: Past, Present and Future.

Authors:  Vikas Soekhai; Esther W de Bekker-Grob; Alan R Ellis; Caroline M Vass
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-02       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 7.  Physician preferences for working in deprived areas: a systematic review of discrete choice experiment.

Authors:  Pejman Hamouzadeh; Ali Akbarisari; Alireza Olyaeemanesh; Mir-Saeed Yekaninejad
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2019-08-14

Review 8.  Factors associated with increasing rural doctor supply in Asia-Pacific LMICs: a scoping review.

Authors:  Likke Prawidya Putri; Belinda Gabrielle O'Sullivan; Deborah Jane Russell; Rebecca Kippen
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2020-12-01

Review 9.  The use of discrete choice experiments to inform health workforce policy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Kate L Mandeville; Mylene Lagarde; Kara Hanson
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2014-09-01       Impact factor: 2.655

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.