Literature DB >> 23348905

Immunohistochemical pitfalls and the importance of glypican 3 and arginase in the diagnosis of scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma.

Gregor Krings1, Rageshree Ramachandran, Dhanpat Jain, Tsung-Teh Wu, Matthew M Yeh, Michael Torbenson, Sanjay Kakar.   

Abstract

Scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma is a rare ill-defined morphological subtype of hepatocellular carcinoma characterized by marked stromal fibrosis. This variant can be difficult to distinguish from intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma and metastatic adenocarcinoma, especially on needle biopsies. We performed immunohistochemistry for hepatocellular and adenocarcinoma-associated markers on 20 scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma cases and compared the results with classical hepatocellular carcinoma and intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma. Scirrhous hepatocellular carcinomas were significantly less likely to be HepPar-1 positive than classical hepatocellular carcinomas (26% and 74%, respectively; P<0.001) and were significantly more likely to express adenocarcinoma-associated markers such as epithelial cell adhesion molecule (63 vs 11%; P<0.001), cytokeratin 19 (26 vs 2%; P<0.001), and cytokeratin 7 (53 vs 2%; P<0.001). At least one of these adenocarcinoma-related markers was positive in 80% of scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma cases. Glypican 3 and arginase were positive in 79% and 85% of cases of scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma, respectively; the combined use of these two markers yielded 100% sensitivity for scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma. In conclusion, the scirrhous morphology, absence of HepPar-1 staining, and frequent positivity with adenocarcinoma-related markers in scirrhous hepatocellular carcinoma can lead to an erroneous diagnosis of adenocarcinoma. Glypican 3 and arginase are the most reliable markers for identifying hepatocellular differentiation in this setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23348905     DOI: 10.1038/modpathol.2012.243

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mod Pathol        ISSN: 0893-3952            Impact factor:   7.842


  16 in total

Review 1.  Biphenotypic (hepatobiliary) primary liver carcinomas: the work in progress.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Brunt; Valerie Paradis; Christine Sempoux; Neil D Theise
Journal:  Hepat Oncol       Date:  2015-07-28

2.  The Applicability of a Human Immunohistochemical Panel to Mouse Models of Hepatocellular Neoplasia.

Authors:  Kenneth J Salleng; Frank L Revetta; Natasha G Deane; M Kay Washington
Journal:  Comp Med       Date:  2015-10       Impact factor: 0.982

3.  Immunohistochemical detection of arginase-I expression in formalin-fixed lung and other tissues.

Authors:  Christine M Hochstedler; Mariah R Leidinger; Mary T Maher-Sturm; Katherine N Gibson-Corley; David K Meyerholz
Journal:  J Histotechnol       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 0.714

4.  Branched chain in situ hybridization for albumin as a marker of hepatocellular differentiation: evaluation of manual and automated in situ hybridization platforms.

Authors:  Mohammad Shahid; Aysha Mubeen; Julie Tse; Sanjay Kakar; Adrian C Bateman; Darrell Borger; Miguel N Rivera; David T Ting; Vikram Deshpande
Journal:  Am J Surg Pathol       Date:  2015-01       Impact factor: 6.394

5.  The Diagnostic Value of Arginase-1, FTCD, and MOC-31 Expression in Early Detection of Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) and in Differentiation Between HCC and Metastatic Adenocarcinoma to the Liver.

Authors:  Osama H Labib; Ola A Harb; Osama H Khalil; Taha A Baiomy; Loay M Gertallah; Rham Z Ahmed
Journal:  J Gastrointest Cancer       Date:  2020-03

Review 6.  Multidisciplinary perspective of hepatocellular carcinoma: A Pacific Northwest experience.

Authors:  Matthew M Yeh; Raymond S Yeung; Smith Apisarnthanarax; Renuka Bhattacharya; Carlos Cuevas; William P Harris; Tony Lim Kiat Hon; Siddharth A Padia; James O Park; Kevin M Riggle; Sayed S Daoud
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-18

Review 7.  Current concepts in the immunohistochemical evaluation of liver tumors.

Authors:  Anne K Koehne de Gonzalez; Marcela A Salomao; Stephen M Lagana
Journal:  World J Hepatol       Date:  2015-06-08

8.  Efficacy of expressions of Arg-1, Hep Par-1, and CK19 in the diagnosis of the primary hepatocellular carcinoma subtypes and exclusion of the metastases.

Authors:  Ihab Shafek Atta
Journal:  Histol Histopathol       Date:  2021-07-13       Impact factor: 2.303

Review 9.  Application of Immunohistochemistry in the Pathological Diagnosis of Liver Tumors.

Authors:  Yoshihisa Takahashi; Erdenetsogt Dungubat; Hiroyuki Kusano; Dariimaa Ganbat; Yasuhiko Tomita; Sarandelger Odgerel; Toshio Fukusato
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2021-05-28       Impact factor: 5.923

10.  Diagnostic Value of Arginase-1 and Glypican-3 in Differential Diagnosis of Hepatocellular Carcinoma, Cholangiocarcinoma and Metastatic Carcinoma of Liver.

Authors:  Bita Geramizadeh; Nasibe Seirfar
Journal:  Hepat Mon       Date:  2015-07-23       Impact factor: 0.660

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.