Literature DB >> 23348777

Environmental complexity influences association network structure and network-based diffusion of foraging information in fish shoals.

Mike M Webster1, Nicola Atton, William J E Hoppitt, Kevin N Laland.   

Abstract

Socially transmitted information can significantly affect the ways in which animals interact with their environments. We used network-based diffusion analysis, a novel and powerful tool for exploring information transmission, to model the rate at which sticklebacks (Gasterosteus aculeatus) discovered prey patches, comparing shoals foraging in open and structured environments. We found that for groups in the open environment, individuals tended to recruit to both the prey patch and empty comparison patches at similar times, suggesting that patch discovery was not greatly affected by direct social transmission. In contrast, in structured environments we found strong evidence that information about prey patch location was socially transmitted and moreover that the pathway of information transmission followed the shoals' association network structures. Our findings highlight the importance of considering habitat structure when investigating the diffusion of information through populations and imply that association networks take on greater ecological significance in structured than open environments.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23348777     DOI: 10.1086/668825

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  17 in total

1.  Evolution of individual versus social learning on social networks.

Authors:  Kohei Tamura; Yutaka Kobayashi; Yasuo Ihara
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2015-03-06       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Fear of predation shapes social network structure and the acquisition of foraging information in guppy shoals.

Authors:  Matthew J Hasenjager; Lee A Dugatkin
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2017-11-29       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Collective Behavior in Wild Zebrafish.

Authors:  Delia S Shelton; Sierra G Shelton; Danita K Daniel; Manickam Raja; Anuradha Bhat; Robyn L Tanguay; Dennis M Higgs; Emília P Martins
Journal:  Zebrafish       Date:  2020-06-09       Impact factor: 1.985

4.  The modularity of a social group does not affect the transmission speed of a novel, socially learned behaviour, or the formation of local variants.

Authors:  Philippa R Laker; William Hoppitt; Michael Weiss; Joah R Madden
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-03-24       Impact factor: 5.349

5.  Food discovery is associated with different reliance on social learning and lower cognitive flexibility across environments in a food-caching bird.

Authors:  Virginia K Heinen; Angela M Pitera; Benjamin R Sonnenberg; Lauren M Benedict; Eli S Bridge; Damien R Farine; Vladimir V Pravosudov
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-05-19       Impact factor: 5.530

6.  Constructing, conducting and interpreting animal social network analysis.

Authors:  Damien R Farine; Hal Whitehead
Journal:  J Anim Ecol       Date:  2015-08-11       Impact factor: 5.091

7.  Pathways of information transmission among wild songbirds follow experimentally imposed changes in social foraging structure.

Authors:  Josh A Firth; Ben C Sheldon; Damien R Farine
Journal:  Biol Lett       Date:  2016-06       Impact factor: 3.703

8.  Familiarity affects social network structure and discovery of prey patch locations in foraging stickleback shoals.

Authors:  N Atton; B J Galef; W Hoppitt; M M Webster; K N Laland
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2014-08-22       Impact factor: 5.349

9.  Sequential phenotypic constraints on social information use in wild baboons.

Authors:  Alecia J Carter; Miquel Torrents Ticó; Guy Cowlishaw
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2016-04-12       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  Environmental disturbance increases social connectivity in a passerine bird.

Authors:  Samantha M Lantz; Jordan Karubian
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-08-30       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.