OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the protective effect of remote ischemic per-conditioning in ischemia and reperfusion-induced renal injury. METHODS: Fifteen rats (Rattus norvegicus) were randomized into three groups (n = 5): Group Normality (GN), Control Ischemia and Reperfusion (GIR) and Group remote ischemic per-conditioning (GPER). With the exception of the GN group, all others underwent renal ischemia for 30 minutes. In group GPER we performed the ischemic remote per-conditioning, consisting of three cycles of ischemia and reperfusion applied every five minutes during the ischemic period, to the left hindlimb of the rats by means of a tourniquet. To quantify the lesions we measured serum levels of creatinine and urea, as well as analyzed renal histopathology. RESULTS: The GPER group presented with better levels of urea (83.74 ± 14.58%) and creatinine (0.72 ± 26.14%) when compared to GIR group, approaching the GN group. Histopathologically, the lower levels of medullary congestion and hydropic degeneration were found in group GPER. CONCLUSION: The remote ischemic per-conditioning had a significant protective effect on renal ischemia and reperfusion.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the protective effect of remote ischemic per-conditioning in ischemia and reperfusion-induced renal injury. METHODS: Fifteen rats (Rattus norvegicus) were randomized into three groups (n = 5): Group Normality (GN), Control Ischemia and Reperfusion (GIR) and Group remote ischemic per-conditioning (GPER). With the exception of the GN group, all others underwent renal ischemia for 30 minutes. In group GPER we performed the ischemic remote per-conditioning, consisting of three cycles of ischemia and reperfusion applied every five minutes during the ischemic period, to the left hindlimb of the rats by means of a tourniquet. To quantify the lesions we measured serum levels of creatinine and urea, as well as analyzed renal histopathology. RESULTS: The GPER group presented with better levels of urea (83.74 ± 14.58%) and creatinine (0.72 ± 26.14%) when compared to GIR group, approaching the GN group. Histopathologically, the lower levels of medullary congestion and hydropic degeneration were found in group GPER. CONCLUSION: The remote ischemic per-conditioning had a significant protective effect on renal ischemia and reperfusion.
Authors: Sara M Mostafa; Ashraf A Aly; Stefan Bräse; Martin Nieger; Sara Mohamed Naguib Abdelhafez; Walaa Yehia Abdelzaher; El-Shimaa M N Abdelhafez Journal: Molecules Date: 2022-03-31 Impact factor: 4.927
Authors: Felipe Lobato da Silva Costa; Renan Kleber Costa Teixeira; Vitor Nagai Yamaki; André Lopes Valente; Sandro Percário; Marcus Vinicius Henriques Brito Journal: J Vasc Bras Date: 2020-05-08