Literature DB >> 23347861

Calculation of the index of microcirculatory resistance without coronary wedge pressure measurement in the presence of epicardial stenosis.

Andy S Yong1, Jamie Layland, William F Fearon, Michael Ho, Maulik G Shah, David Daniels, Robert Whitbourn, Andrew Macisaac, Leonard Kritharides, Andrew Wilson, Martin K Ng.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: This study sought to investigate a novel method to calculate the index of microcirculatory resistance (IMR) in the presence of significant epicardial stenosis without the need for balloon dilation to measure the coronary wedge pressure (P(w)).
BACKGROUND: The IMR provides a quantitative measure of coronary microvasculature status. However, in the presence of significant epicardial stenosis, IMR calculation requires incorporation of the coronary fractional flow reserve (FFR(cor)), which requires balloon dilation within the coronary artery for P(w) measurement.
METHODS: A method to calculate IMR by estimating FFR(cor) from myocardial FFR (FFR(myo)), which does not require P(w) measurement, was developed from a derivation cohort of 50 patients from a single institution. This method to calculate IMR was then validated in a cohort of 72 patients from 2 other different institutions. Physiology measurements were obtained with a pressure-temperature sensor wire before coronary intervention in both cohorts.
RESULTS: From the derivation cohort, a strong linear relationship was found between FFR(cor) and FFR(myo) (FFR(cor) = 1.34 × FFR(myo) - 0.32, r(2) = 0.87, p < 0.001) by regression analysis. With this equation to estimate FFR(cor) in the validation cohort, there was no significant difference between IMR calculated from estimated FFR(cor) and measured FFR(cor) (21.2 ± 12.9 U vs. 20.4 ± 13.6 U, p = 0.161). There was good correlation (r = 0.93, p < 0.001) and agreement by Bland-Altman analysis between calculated and measured IMR.
CONCLUSIONS: The FFR(cor), and, by extension, microcirculatory resistance can be derived without the need for P(w). This method enables assessment of coronary microcirculatory status before or without balloon inflation, in the presence of epicardial stenosis.
Copyright © 2013 American College of Cardiology Foundation. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23347861     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2012.08.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  36 in total

Review 1.  Coronary physiology assessment in the catheterization laboratory.

Authors:  Felipe Díez-Delhoyo; Enrique Gutiérrez-Ibañes; Gerard Loughlin; Ricardo Sanz-Ruiz; María Eugenia Vázquez-Álvarez; Fernando Sarnago-Cebada; Rocío Angulo-Llanos; Ana Casado-Plasencia; Jaime Elízaga; Francisco Fernández Avilés Diáz
Journal:  World J Cardiol       Date:  2015-09-26

Review 2.  Regulation of Coronary Blood Flow.

Authors:  Adam G Goodwill; Gregory M Dick; Alexander M Kiel; Johnathan D Tune
Journal:  Compr Physiol       Date:  2017-03-16       Impact factor: 9.090

3.  Rationale and design of the quantification of myocardial blood flow using dynamic PET/CTA-fused imagery (DEMYSTIFY) to determine physiological significance of specific coronary lesions.

Authors:  Ahmed AlBadri; Marina Piccinelli; Sang-Geon Cho; Joo Myung Lee; Wissam Jaber; Carlo N De Cecco; Habib Samady; Bon-Kwon Koo; Hee-Seung Bom; Ernest V Garcia
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2020-02-05       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 4.  PET measurements of myocardial blood flow post myocardial infarction: Relationship to invasive and cardiac magnetic resonance studies and potential clinical applications.

Authors:  Henry Gewirtz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-06-02       Impact factor: 5.952

5.  Index of microcirculatory resistance: state-of-the-art and potential applications in computational simulation of coronary artery disease.

Authors:  Yingyi Geng; Xintong Wu; Haipeng Liu; Dingchang Zheng; Ling Xia
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2022-02-15       Impact factor: 3.066

6.  Non-invasive measures of coronary microcirculation: Taking the long road to the clinic.

Authors:  Kieran S Chung; Patricia K Nguyen
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2017-07-18       Impact factor: 5.952

7.  Microcirculatory significance of periprocedural myocardial necrosis after percutaneous coronary intervention assessed by the index of microcirculatory resistance.

Authors:  Zhiming Wu; Fei Ye; Wei You; Junjie Zhang; Dujiang Xie; Shaoliang Chen
Journal:  Int J Cardiovasc Imaging       Date:  2014-05-11       Impact factor: 2.357

Review 8.  Coronary circulation: Pressure/flow parameters for assessment of ischemic heart disease.

Authors:  Henry Gewirtz
Journal:  J Nucl Cardiol       Date:  2018-04-10       Impact factor: 5.952

Review 9.  The Role of Coronary Physiology in Contemporary Percutaneous Coronary Interventions.

Authors:  Federico Marin; Roberto Scarsini; Dimitrios Terentes-Printzios; Rafail A Kotronias; Flavio Ribichini; Adrian P Banning; Giovanni Luigi De Maria
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2022

Review 10.  Impact of Targeted Therapies for Coronary Microvascular Dysfunction as Assessed by the Index of Microcirculatory Resistance.

Authors:  James Xu; Sidney Lo; Craig P Juergens; Dominic Y Leung
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2020-07-24       Impact factor: 4.132

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.