| Literature DB >> 23347678 |
Hossain M S Sazzad1, M Jahangir Hossain, Emily S Gurley, Kazi M H Ameen, Shahana Parveen, M Saiful Islam, Labib I Faruque, Goutam Podder, Sultana S Banu, Michael K Lo, Pierre E Rollin, Paul A Rota, Peter Daszak, Mahmudur Rahman, Stephen P Luby.
Abstract
Active Nipah virus encephalitis surveillance identified an encephalitis cluster and sporadic cases in Faridpur, Bangladesh, in January 2010. We identified 16 case-patients; 14 of these patients died. For 1 case-patient, the only known exposure was hugging a deceased patient with a probable case, while another case-patient's exposure involved preparing the same corpse for burial by removing oral secretions and anogenital excreta with a cloth and bare hands. Among 7 persons with confirmed sporadic cases, 6 died, including a physician who had physically examined encephalitis patients without gloves or a mask. Nipah virus-infected patients were more likely than community-based controls to report drinking raw date palm sap and to have had physical contact with an encephalitis patient (29% vs. 4%, matched odds ratio undefined). Efforts to prevent transmission should focus on reducing caregivers' exposure to infected patients' bodily secretions during care and traditional burial practices.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23347678 PMCID: PMC3559054 DOI: 10.3201/eid1902.120971
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
Figure 1Surveillance hospitals and locations of outbreak clusters and sporadic cases of Nipah virus infection, Bangladesh, 2010.
Demographic and clinical features of outbreak and sporadic case-patients with encephalitis caused by Nipah virus infection, Faridpur, Bangladesh, 2010*
| Feature | First-generation outbreak, n = 4 | Second-generation outbreak, n = 4 | Sporadic, n = 8 | All, n = 16 |
| Median age, y (range) | 28 (10–45) | 55 (32–60) | 23 (4–45) | 35 (4–60) |
| Male sex | 1 (25) | 3 (75) | 5 (63) | 9 (56) |
| Clinical features | ||||
| Fever | 4 (100) | 4 (100) | 8 (100) | 16 (100) |
| Altered mental status | 4 (100) | 3 (75) | 8 (100) | 15 (94) |
| Unconscious | 4 (100) | 2 (50) | 8 (100) | 14 (88) |
| Difficulty breathing | 2 (50) | 3 (75) | 7 (88) | 12 (75) |
| Headache | 4 (100) | 2 (50) | 4 (50) | 10 (63) |
| Vomiting | 4 (100) | 1 (25) | 3 (38) | 8 (50) |
| Convulsion | 3 (75) | 1 (25) | 3 (38) | 7 (44) |
| Case-fatality rate | 4 (100) | 3 (75) | 7 (88) | 14 (88) |
| Median days (range) from onset of illness to death | 7 (4–8) | 6 (3–7) | 4 (4–17) | 5 (3–17)† |
*Values are no. (%) case-patients except as indicated. †n = 14, all of whom died.
Figure 2Nipah virus infection cases, Faridpur, Bangladesh, 2010. A–H indicate specific case-patients.
Bivariate analysis of risk factors for Nipah virus infection, Faridpur, Bangladesh 2010*
| Risk factor | No. (%) case-patients with risk factors, n = 15 | No. (%) controls with risk factors, n = 58 | mOR (95% CI) | p value |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male sex | 8 (53) | 26 (46) | 1.3 (0.4–4) | 0.62 |
| Climbed tree | 5 (33) | 16 (29) | 1.6 (0.7–3.7) | 0.24 |
| Physical contact with living animal | ||||
| Cow | 11 (73) | 32 (57) | 2.5 (0.6–9.9) | 0.2 |
| Goat | 5 (33) | 26 (46) | 0.4 (0.1–2.2) | 0.3 |
| Pig | 0 | 1 (2) | Undefined | Undefined |
| Chicken | 10 (67) | 39 (70) | 0.9 (0.3–2.9) | 0.83 |
| Duck | 8 (53) | 20 (36) | 1.9 (0.7–5.8) | 0.23 |
| Dog | 1 (7) | 4 (7) | 0.9 (0.1–7.9) | 0.91 |
| Cat | 1 (6) | 7 (13) | 0.4 (0.1–3.9) | 0.45 |
| Fruit bat | 0 | 0 | Undefined | Undefined |
| Physical contact with sick animal | ||||
| Cow | 0 | 4 (7) | Undefined | Undefined |
| Goat | 1 (7) | 1 (2) | 0.9 (0.4–2) | 0.76 |
| Chicken | 0 | 9 (16) | Undefined | Undefined |
| Duck | 1 (7) | 3 (5) | 1.2 (0.1–15) | 0.89 |
| Ate any animal that had been sick | 1 (7) | 3 (5) | 1.2 (0.1–15) | 0.89 |
| Had seen bats in or around residence at night | 12 (80) | 39 (70) | 1.2 (0.1–15) | 0.89 |
| Drank raw DPS | 9 (69) | 17 (30) | 7.9 (1.6–40) | 0.012 |
| Drank DPS before 9:00 | 8 (53) | 16 (100) | Undefined | Undefined |
| DPS was | ||||
| Purchased | 2 (20) | 5 (33) | 0.4 (0.04–4.8) | 0.49 |
| Given | 2 (20) | 4 (27) | Undefined | Undefined |
| Collected by a family member | 6 (67) | 5 (33) | Undefined | Undefined |
| Consumption of raw DPS during month before onset of illness, per day | ||||
| 0 | 5 (33) | 40 (71) | 1 | |
| <1 glass | 4 (27) | 4 (7) | 32 (2.1–474) | 0.01 |
| 1 glass | 3 (20) | 9 (16) | 4.3 (0.6–29) | 0.13 |
| >1 glass | 3 (20) | 3 (5) | 22 (1.2–404) | 0.04 |
| Is DPS harvester by profession | 4 (27) | 4 (7) | 8.7 (0.9–83) | 0.06 |
| Household member harvests DPS by profession | 4 (27) | 4 (7) | 8.7 (0.9–83) | 0.06 |
| Household distributes or sells DPS | 4 (27) | 5 (9) | 10 (1.1–100) | 0.04 |
| Ate fruit | ||||
| Banana | 11 (73) | 33 (60) | 1.9 (0.5–6.5) | 0.32 |
| Boroy/plum | 7 (47) | 29 (53) | 0.8 (0.2–3.1) | 0.75 |
| Papaya | 8 (53) | 29 (52) | 1.1 (0.3–3.2) | 0.95 |
| Sofeda | 3 (20) | 14 (25) | 0.7 (0.1–3.7) | 0.67 |
| Kamranga | 0 | 6 (11) | Undefined | Undefined |
| Guava | 4 (29) | 14 (25) | 1.4 (0.2–8.4) | 0.71 |
| Tamarind | 1 (7) | 8 (14) | 0.4 (0.4–3.7) | 0.42 |
| Custard apple | 1 (7) | 1 (2) | Undefined | Undefined |
| Visited another subdistrict | 5 (33) | 14 (25) | 1.6 (0.4–5.7) | 0.47 |
| Touched someone with fever and altered mental status who died later | 4 (29) | 2 (4) | Undefined | Undefined |
| Was in same room as someone with fever and altered mental status who died later | 4 (29) | 2 (4) | Undefined | Undefined |
*mOR, matched odds ratio; DPS, date palm sap.