| Literature DB >> 23347529 |
Tatjana Dill1, Gerhard Dobler, Elmar Saathoff, Petra Clowes, Inge Kroidl, Elias Ntinginya, Harun Machibya, Leonard Maboko, Thomas Löscher, Michael Hoelscher, Norbert Heinrich.
Abstract
Rickettsioses caused by typhus group rickettsiae have been reported in various African regions. We conducted a cross-sectional survey of 1,227 participants from 9 different sites in the Mbeya region, Tanzania; overall seroprevalence of typhus group rickettsiae was 9.3%. Risk factors identified in multivariable analysis included low vegetation density and highway proximity.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23347529 PMCID: PMC3559041 DOI: 10.3201/eid1902.120601
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Emerg Infect Dis ISSN: 1080-6040 Impact factor: 6.883
FigureStudy sites in Tanzania, showing positivity and negativity for IgG against Rickettsia typhi displayed in Voronoi polygons. Every polygon represents 1 household. Numbers in parentheses indicate site prevalence.
Covariates associated with seropositivity for typhus group rickettsiae, Mbeya region, southwestern Tanzania, 2007*
| Covariate/stratum | No. specimens (% positive) | Univariable†‡ | Multivariable†§ | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| PR (95% CI) | p value | PR (95% CI) | p value | |||
| Age, y | ||||||
| 5–<13.6 | 245 (5.3) | 1 | – | 1 (–) | – | |
| 13.6–<27.7 | 245 (6.5) | 1.23 (0.60–2.51) | 0.568 | 1.28 (0.63–2.58) | 0.495 | |
| 27.8–<42.1 | 243 (12.3) | 2.33 (1.23–4.39) | 0.009 | 2.40 (1.28–4.49) | 0.006 | |
| 42.1–55.2 | 248 (14.9) | 2.81 (1.53–5.18) | 0.001 | 2.73 (1.49–4.99) | 0.001 | |
| >55.2 | 246 (7.3) | 1.38 (0.69–2.76) | 0.365 |
| 1.41 (0.71–2.80) | 0.331 |
| Distance to nearest highway, km | 1,227 (9.3) | 0.96 (0.94–0.99) | 0.012 | 0.97 (0–0.99) | 0.011 | |
| Enhanced vegetation index, per 0.1 units | 1,227 (9.3) | 0.58 (0.44–0.76) | <0.001 | 0.60 (0.46–0.79) | <0.001 | |
| Persons/km2, per 1,000 persons | 1,227 (9.3) | 1.08 (1.04–1.12) | <0.001 |
|
|
|
| Sex | ||||||
| F | 672 (8.6) | 1 | – | |||
| M | 544 (9.9) | 1.15 (0.81–1.63) | 0.430 | |||
| Unknown | 11 (18.2) | 2.11 (0.59–7.58) | 0.254 |
|
|
|
| SES rank, per unit¶ | 1,227 (9.3) | 1.08 (1.02–1.15) | 0.008 |
|
|
|
| Cattle/km2, per 100 cattle | 1,227 (9.3) | 1.28 (1.05–1.56) | 0.017 | |||
| No. cows owned | 1,227 (9.3) | 0.96 (0.84–1.09) | 0.526 | |||
| No. goats owned | 1,227 (9.3) | 0.94 (0.83–1.07) | 0.367 |
|
|
|
| Dogs owned | ||||||
| No | 820 (8.8) | 1 |
| |||
| Yes | 191 (8.4) | 0.95 (0.54–1.67) | 0.869 | |||
| No information | 216 (12.0) | 1.37 (0.89–2.11) | 0.150 |
|
|
|
| Minimum ambient temperature, °C | 1,227 (9.3) | 0.92 (0.87–0.97) | 0.004 | |||
| Average day land surface temperature, °C | 1,227 (9.3) | 1.37 (0.71–2.63) | 0.351 | |||
| Average night land surface temperature, °C | 1,227 (9.3) | 0.61 (0.38–0.99) | 0.044 |
|
|
|
| Elevation, per 100 m | 1,227 (9.3) | 1.04 (1.00–1.08) | 0.025 | |||
| Rainfall, per 1,000 mm | 1,227 (9.3) | 0.53 (0.30–0.92) | 0.025 | |||
*PR, prevalence ratio; SES, socioeconomic status. Blank cells indicate that the variables were not included in the multivariable analyses due to lack of multivariable significance. †Results of univariable and multivariable Poisson regression adjusted for household clustering by using robust variance estimates. ‡Results of separate models for each of the covariates below. §Multivariable model, including only age, distance to nearest highway, and enhanced vegetation index as covariates. ¶SES rank, rank (from 0 [lowest] to 10 [highest]), according to socioeconomic score.