Literature DB >> 23347496

The fiscal impact of informal caregiving to home care recipients in Canada: how the intensity of care influences costs and benefits to government.

Josephine C Jacobs1, Meredith B Lilly, Carita Ng, Peter C Coyte.   

Abstract

The objective of this study was to estimate the annual costs and consequences of unpaid caregiving by Canadians from a government perspective. We estimated these costs both at the individual and population levels for caregivers aged 45 and older. We conducted a cost-benefit analysis where we considered the costs of unpaid caregiving to be potential losses in income tax revenues and changes in social assistance payments and the potential benefit of reduced paid care expenditures. Our costing methods were based on multivariate analyses using the 2007 General Social Survey, a cross-sectional survey of 23,404 individuals. We determined the differential probability of employment, wages, and hours worked by caregivers of varying intensity versus non-caregivers. We also used multivariate analysis to determine how receiving different intensities of unpaid care impacted both the probability of receiving paid care and the weekly hours of paid care received. At the lowest intensities of caregiving, there was a net benefit to government from caregiving, at both the individual and population levels. At the population level, the net benefit to government was estimated to be $4.4 billion for caregivers providing less than five hours of weekly care. At the highest intensity of caregiving, there was a net cost to government of $641 million. Our overall findings were robust to a number of changes applied in our sensitivity analysis. We found that the factor with the greatest impact on cost was the probability of labour force participation. As the biggest cost driver appears to be the higher likelihood of intense caregivers dropping out of the labour force, government policies that enable intense caregivers to balance caregiving with employment may help to mitigate these losses.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23347496     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2012.12.015

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  6 in total

1.  Medicare claims indicators of healthcare utilization differences after hospitalization for ischemic stroke: Race, gender, and caregiving effects.

Authors:  David L Roth; Orla C Sheehan; Jin Huang; James D Rhodes; Suzanne E Judd; Meredith Kilgore; Brett Kissela; Janet Prvu Bettger; William E Haley
Journal:  Int J Stroke       Date:  2016-07-21       Impact factor: 5.266

2.  Economic Spillover Effects of Intensive Unpaid Caregiving.

Authors:  Josephine C Jacobs; Courtney H Van Houtven; Terri Tanielian; Rajeev Ramchand
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2019-04       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 3.  Can we do better? Economic analysis of human resource investment to improve home care service for the elderly in Serbia.

Authors:  Marko M Mihic; Marija Lj Todorovic; Vladimir Lj Obradovic; Zorica M Mitrovic
Journal:  Clin Interv Aging       Date:  2016-01-28       Impact factor: 4.458

4.  Caregiving time costs and trade-offs: Gender differences in Sweden, the UK, and Canada.

Authors:  Maria Stanfors; Josephine C Jacobs; Jeffrey Neilson
Journal:  SSM Popul Health       Date:  2019-10-17

5.  Do characteristics of family members influence older persons' transition to long-term healthcare services?

Authors:  Astri Syse; Alyona Artamonova; Michael Thomas; Marijke Veenstra
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2022-03-18       Impact factor: 2.655

Review 6.  Collecting Information on Caregivers' Financial Well-Being: A Document Review of Federal Surveys in Canada.

Authors:  Husayn Marani; Sara Allin
Journal:  J Appl Gerontol       Date:  2022-05-21
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.