Literature DB >> 23347127

Informed decision making regarding antenatal screening for fetal abnormality in the United Kingdom: a qualitative study of parents and professionals.

Owen Barr1, Heather Skirton.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to explore the views of parents and health professionals regarding informed decision making for antenatal screening for Down syndrome. This qualitative study was based on thematic analysis and conducted in England, where screening for Down syndrome is universally offered to all pregnant women. Four focus groups were held with pregnant women and/or their partners (n = 22), and another four groups were held with health professionals who offer antenatal screening (n = 22). Data were analyzed through coding of the transcribed focus group discussions and extraction of main themes. Extracted themes were: information overload, gaps in information, challenges in providing information and involvement of both parents in the decision. Parents and professionals believed that burdening parents with untimely information on a wide range of topics in the first trimester detracted from decision making about screening. Many parents also reported they were not sufficiently informed and wanted individualized discussion with a health professional. To ensure parents make informed decisions, information on screening should be provided at the appropriate time, with opportunity for personal discussion with a knowledgeable health professional.
© 2013 Wiley Publishing Asia Pty Ltd.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Down syndrome; antenatal screening; focus groups; informed consent; midwives; parents

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23347127     DOI: 10.1111/nhs.12034

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nurs Health Sci        ISSN: 1441-0745            Impact factor:   1.857


  7 in total

1.  An easy test but a hard decision: ethical issues concerning non-invasive prenatal testing for autosomal recessive disorders.

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Lesley Goldsmith; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2014-11-05       Impact factor: 4.246

2.  Breaking bad news to antenatal patients with strategies to lessen the pain: a qualitative study.

Authors:  José Atienza-Carrasco; Manuel Linares-Abad; María Padilla-Ruiz; Isabel María Morales-Gil
Journal:  Reprod Health       Date:  2018-01-23       Impact factor: 3.223

3.  Development and evaluation of training resources to prepare health professionals for counselling pregnant women about non-invasive prenatal testing for Down syndrome: a mixed methods study.

Authors:  Kerry Oxenford; Rebecca Daley; Celine Lewis; Melissa Hill; Lyn S Chitty
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-04-27       Impact factor: 3.007

4.  A Framework for Describing the Influence of Service Organisation and Delivery on Participation in Fetal Anomaly Screening in England.

Authors:  Hyacinth O Ukuhor; Janet Hirst; S José Closs; William J Montelpare
Journal:  J Pregnancy       Date:  2017-03-22

5.  First and second trimester ultrasound in pregnancy: A systematic review and metasynthesis of the views and experiences of pregnant women, partners, and health workers.

Authors:  Gill Moncrieff; Kenneth Finlayson; Sarah Cordey; Rebekah McCrimmon; Catherine Harris; Maria Barreix; Özge Tunçalp; Soo Downe
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-12-14       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Offering prenatal diagnostic tests: European guidelines for clinical practice [corrected].

Authors:  Heather Skirton; Lesley Goldsmith; Leigh Jackson; Celine Lewis; Lyn Chitty
Journal:  Eur J Hum Genet       Date:  2013-09-11       Impact factor: 4.246

7.  Implementing non-invasive prenatal testing into publicly funded antenatal screening services for Down syndrome and other conditions in Aotearoa New Zealand.

Authors:  Sara Filoche; Fiona Cram; Bev Lawton; Angela Beard; Peter Stone
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2017-10-04       Impact factor: 3.007

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.