Joan Simons1. 1. Department of Health Social Care at The Open University, Milton Keynes, UK. j.m.simons@open.ac.uk
Abstract
AIM: To explain Q methodology, an untraditional approach to nursing research, by exploring the various stages involved in it and using two studies. BACKGROUND: Q has some of the advantages of qualitative and quantitative, methodologies. A defining principle of Q is its assumption that subjective viewpoints are amenable to systematic analysis. Q aims to identify shared views across a population. The orientation of the uncovered perspectives differs significantly from qualitative research and there is no researcher bias. DATA SOURCES: Studies on living with chronic pain and the therapeutic relationship in mental health nursing. REVIEW METHODS: A review of the advantages and disadvantages of Q. DISCUSSION: In areas where there are many contradictions and contrasting views, for example nursing practice, such a methodology could bring clarity in identifying subjective views of different groups. This article will first present the methodology followed by two examples of studies that have been carried out. CONCLUSION: This article demonstrates that Q has much to offer nurse researchers, because the identification of patients' viewpoints in a reliable way has the potential to help nurses to deliver evidence-based practice in response to patients' needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH/PRACTICE: Q methodology has much to offer nursing research because the identification of patients' viewpoints has the potential to enhance nurses' abilities to deliver responsive evidence-based practice.
AIM: To explain Q methodology, an untraditional approach to nursing research, by exploring the various stages involved in it and using two studies. BACKGROUND: Q has some of the advantages of qualitative and quantitative, methodologies. A defining principle of Q is its assumption that subjective viewpoints are amenable to systematic analysis. Q aims to identify shared views across a population. The orientation of the uncovered perspectives differs significantly from qualitative research and there is no researcher bias. DATA SOURCES: Studies on living with chronic pain and the therapeutic relationship in mental health nursing. REVIEW METHODS: A review of the advantages and disadvantages of Q. DISCUSSION: In areas where there are many contradictions and contrasting views, for example nursing practice, such a methodology could bring clarity in identifying subjective views of different groups. This article will first present the methodology followed by two examples of studies that have been carried out. CONCLUSION: This article demonstrates that Q has much to offer nurse researchers, because the identification of patients' viewpoints in a reliable way has the potential to help nurses to deliver evidence-based practice in response to patients' needs. IMPLICATIONS FOR RESEARCH/PRACTICE: Q methodology has much to offer nursing research because the identification of patients' viewpoints has the potential to enhance nurses' abilities to deliver responsive evidence-based practice.
Authors: Kate Churruca; Kristiana Ludlow; Wendy Wu; Kate Gibbons; Hoa Mi Nguyen; Louise A Ellis; Jeffrey Braithwaite Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2021-06-21 Impact factor: 4.615