| Literature DB >> 23346156 |
Hyeeun Shin1, Man Ho Kim, Su Jin Lee, Kyung-Han Lee, Mi-Jung Kim, Ji Sun Kim, Jin Whan Cho.
Abstract
BACKGROUND ANDEntities:
Keywords: FDG-PET; Huntington's disease; biomarker; cortical metabolism; progression
Year: 2013 PMID: 23346156 PMCID: PMC3543905 DOI: 10.3988/jcn.2013.9.1.21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Clin Neurol ISSN: 1738-6586 Impact factor: 3.077
Clinical characteristics of 13 patients with Huntington's disease (HD) who were investigated using FDG-PET
Seven patients were assigned to the slower-progression group and six to the faster-progression group.
Duration: disease duration (years) at the time of follow-up, FDG-PET: fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography, f/u: followup, IS: score of independence scale of the Unified Huntington's Disease Rating Scale, IS-PET: IS at the time of the FDG-PET scan, PR: progression rate (see main text), TNR: number of trinucleotide repeats.
Comparison of regional metabolism among the faster-and slower-progression HD groups and the normal-controls group
Numeric value for regions in each group is mean regional/cerebellar region-of-interest ratio.
*Kruskal-Wallis test among faster-progression patients, slower-progression patients, and controls, †,‡,§Mann-Whitney test for comparisons between faster- and slower-progression patients (†), faster-progression patients and controls (‡), and slower patients-progression and controls (§); p values <0.05 were considered statistically significant.
L: left, R: right.
Fig. 1Comparison of the FDG-PET regional cerebral/cerebellar region-of-interest ratio among faster- and slower-progression Huntington's disease (HD) groups and age- and sex-matched controls. The decreases in metabolism in the bilateral frontal, parietal cortices, and right temporal cortex were significantly greater in the faster-progression group than in the slower-progression group. The metabolism in the occipital cortices and thalami did not differ between the two HD groups. Data are not shown for the bilateral caudate nuclei because of severe decreases in both patient groups. *A statistically significant difference among the groups (p<0.05).