Literature DB >> 23345629

Percutaneous sacroplasty using CT guidance for pain palliation in sacral insufficiency fractures.

Ryne W Dougherty1, Jennifer S McDonald, Yong Woon Cho, John T Wald, Kent R Thielen, David F Kallmes.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVE: Sacroplasty has emerged as a treatment option for patients with painful osteoporotic sacral insufficiency fractures. We report short-term outcomes in a consecutive cohort of patients treated with sacroplasty.
METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed 57 patients treated with sacroplasty for painful osteoporotic sacral fractures at our institution between 2004 and 2011. An 11-point numerical rating scale pain score was recorded at rest and at activity pre- and post-procedure. Opioids prescribed to the patient both pre- and post-procedure were recorded.
RESULTS: Mean duration of pain prior to sacroplasty was 3 weeks (IQR 2-5). Procedural complications were minimal. Median post-procedure follow-up time was 2.5 weeks (IQR 1-5) among 45 patients with available data. Thirty-seven (82%) of the 45 patients experienced a numerical or descriptive decrease from initial pain at follow-up. Median activity pain scores collected from 13 patients decreased from 10 (IQR 8.5-10) pre-procedure to 6 (IQR 4-6.8) post-procedure (p<0.0001), and median rest pain scores collected from 29 patients decreased from 7 (IQR 4-8.5) to 2 (IQR 1-3.5)(p<0.0001). Twenty-two (76%) of 29 patients had at least a 30% decrease in rest pain scores. The median number of opioids prescribed per patient decreased from 1 (IQR 1-2) pre-procedure to 0 (IQR 0-1) post-procedure (p<0.0001). Thirty-four of 57 patients (60%) had decreased opioid usage, 15 (26%) patients had unchanged usage and 8 (14%) had increased usage.
CONCLUSIONS: Our series demonstrates that sacroplasty is a safe and effective treatment in patients with painful osteoporotic insufficiency fractures.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Intervention; Spine; Technique

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23345629     DOI: 10.1136/neurintsurg-2012-010599

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurointerv Surg        ISSN: 1759-8478            Impact factor:   5.836


  5 in total

1.  Safety and effectiveness of sacroplasty: a large single-center experience.

Authors:  A C Gupta; R V Chandra; A J Yoo; T M Leslie-Mazwi; D L Bell; B P Mehta; T L Vanderboom; J D Rabinov; M Larvie; J A Hirsch
Journal:  AJNR Am J Neuroradiol       Date:  2014-07-10       Impact factor: 3.825

Review 2.  Percutaneous sacroplasty for the management of painful pathologic fracture in a multiple myeloma patient: Case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  A A Dmytriw; K Talla; R Smith
Journal:  Neuroradiol J       Date:  2016-11-25

3.  ASSERT (Acute Sacral inSufficiEncy fractuRe augmenTation): randomised controlled, feasibility trial in older people.

Authors:  Terence Ong; Ana Suazo Di Paola; Cassandra Brookes; Avril Drummond; Paul Hendrick; Paul Leighton; Matthew Jones; Khalid Salem; Nasir Quraishi; Opinder Sahota
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-05-03       Impact factor: 3.006

Review 4.  Safety and efficacy of percutaneous sacroplasty for treatment of sacral insufficiency fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  Bilal Mahmood; Jordan Pasternack; Afshin Razi; Ahmed Saleh
Journal:  J Spine Surg       Date:  2019-09

5.  Effects of Percutaneous Sacroplasty on Pain and Mobility in Sacral Insufficiency Fracture.

Authors:  Kyung-Chul Choi; Seung-Ho Shin; Dong Chan Lee; Hyeong-Ki Shim; Choon-Keun Park
Journal:  J Korean Neurosurg Soc       Date:  2016-12-29
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.