Literature DB >> 23345561

Rumen morphometrics and the effect of digesta pH and volume on volatile fatty acid absorption.

L Q Melo1, S F Costa, F Lopes, M C Guerreiro, L E Armentano, M N Pereira.   

Abstract

The effects of rumen digesta volume and pH on VFA absorption and its relation to rumen wall morphology were evaluated. Nine rumen cannulated cows formed 3 groups based on desired variation in rumen morphology: The High group was formed by Holsteins yielding 25.9 kg milk/d and fed on a high-grain total mixed ration (TMR); the Medium group by Holstein-Zebu crossbreds yielding 12.3 kg milk/d and fed on corn silage, tropical pasture, and a commercial concentrate; and the Dry group by nonlactating grazing Jerseys fed exclusively on tropical pasture. Within each group, a sequence of 3 ruminal conditions was induced on each cow in 3 × 3 Latin Squares, with 7-d periods: high digesta volume and high pH (HVHP), low volume and high pH (LVHP), and low volume and low pH (LVLP). Rumen mucosa was biopsied on the first day of Period 1. Ruminal morphometric variables evaluated were mitotic index, absorptive surface and papillae number per square centimeter of wall, area per papillae, papillae area as a percentage of absorptive surface, and epithelium, keratinized layer, and nonkeratinized layer thickness. There was marked variation in rumen morphology among the groups of cows. Grazing Jerseys had decreased rumen wall absorptive surface area and basal cells mitotic index, and increased thickness of the epithelium and of the keratin layer compared with cows receiving concentrates. Mean rumen pH throughout the 4 h sampling period was: 6.78 for HVHP, 7.08 for LVHP, and 5.90 for LVLP (P < 0.01). The capacity of the rumen wall to absorb VFA was estimated by the Valerate/CrEDTA technique. The fractional exponential decay rate for the ratio of valeric acid to Cr (k Val/Cr) was determined by rumen digesta sampling at 20-min intervals during 4 h, after the mixing of markers and the return of the evacuated ruminal content. The k Val/Cr values for treatments HVHP, LVHP, and LVLP were, respectively: 19.6, 23.9, and 35.0 %/h (SEM = 2.01; P = 0.21 for contrast HVHP vs. LVHP and P < 0.01 for contrast LVHP vs. LVLP). The k Val/Cr was faster under low pH, but decreasing digesta volume under high pH did not elicit such a response. The correlation between the absorptive surface area per square centimeter of rumen wall and the mean of the 3 k Val/Cr values of each cow was 0.90 (P < 0.01). Cows capable of maintaining a less-acidic rumen environment had greater inflow of water into the digestive cavity, had a more developed rumen mucosa, and were more efficient VFA absorbers.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23345561     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2011-4999

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  8 in total

1.  Effects of dietary roughage neutral detergent fiber levels and flint corn processing method on growth performance, carcass characteristics, feeding behavior, and rumen morphometrics of Bos indicus cattle1.

Authors:  Antonio Humberto F de Melo; Rodrigo S Marques; Vinícius N Gouvêa; Jonas de Souza; Camila D A Batalha; Débora C Basto; Danilo D Millen; James S Drouillard; Flávio A P Santos
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 3.159

2.  Effects of Concentrate Supplementation on Growth Performance, Rumen Fermentation, and Bacterial Community Composition in Grazing Yaks during the Warm Season.

Authors:  Dongwen Dai; Kaiyue Pang; Shujie Liu; Xun Wang; Yingkui Yang; Shatuo Chai; Shuxiang Wang
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-29       Impact factor: 3.231

3.  Dietary supplements during the cold season increase rumen microbial abundance and improve rumen epithelium development in Tibetan sheep.

Authors:  Xiao Ping Jing; Quan Hui Peng; Rui Hu; Hua Wei Zou; Hong Ze Wang; Xiao Qiang Yu; Jian Wei Zhou; Allan Degen; Zhi Sheng Wang
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Effects of a Change from an Indoor-Based Total Mixed Ration to a Rotational Pasture System Combined With a Moderate Concentrate Feed Supply on Rumen Fermentation of Dairy Cows.

Authors:  Julia Hartwiger; Melanie Schären; Sarah Potthoff; Liane Hüther; Susanne Kersten; Dirk von Soosten; Andreas Beineke; Ulrich Meyer; Gerhard Breves; Sven Dänicke
Journal:  Animals (Basel)       Date:  2018-11-10       Impact factor: 2.752

5.  Impact of Zinc and/or Herbal Mixture on Ruminal Fermentation, Microbiota, and Histopathology in Lambs.

Authors:  Daniel Petrič; Dominika Mravčáková; Katarína Kucková; Svetlana Kišidayová; Adam Cieslak; Malgorzata Szumacher-Strabel; Haihao Huang; Pawel Kolodziejski; Anna Lukomska; Sylwester Slusarczyk; Klaudia Čobanová; Zora Váradyová
Journal:  Front Vet Sci       Date:  2021-01-28

6.  Microbiome and Metabolomics Reveal the Effects of Different Feeding Systems on the Growth and Ruminal Development of Yaks.

Authors:  Chun Huang; Fei Ge; Xixi Yao; Xian Guo; Pengjia Bao; Xiaoming Ma; Xiaoyun Wu; Min Chu; Ping Yan; Chunnian Liang
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2021-06-22       Impact factor: 5.640

7.  Gene network analysis identifies rumen epithelial cell proliferation, differentiation and metabolic pathways perturbed by diet and correlated with methane production.

Authors:  Ruidong Xiang; Jody McNally; Suzanne Rowe; Arjan Jonker; Cesar S Pinares-Patino; V Hutton Oddy; Phil E Vercoe; John C McEwan; Brian P Dalrymple
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-12-14       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Effects of grain processing methods on the expression of genes involved in volatile fatty acid transport and pH regulation, and keratinization in rumen epithelium of beef cattle.

Authors:  Pedro Del Bianco Benedeti; Breno de Castro Silva; Marcos Vinícius Carneiro Pacheco; Nicola Vergara Lopes Serão; Ivan Carvalho Filho; Mariana Mescouto Lopes; Marcos Inácio Marcondes; Hilário Cuquetto Mantovani; Sebastião de Campos Valadares Filho; Edenio Detmann; Marcio de Souza Duarte
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-06-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.