Literature DB >> 23345399

Direct binding between BubR1 and B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes regulate mitotic progression.

Thomas Kruse1, Gang Zhang, Marie Sofie Yoo Larsen, Tiziana Lischetti, Werner Streicher, Tine Kragh Nielsen, Sara Petersen Bjørn, Jakob Nilsson.   

Abstract

BubR1 is a central component of the spindle assembly checkpoint that inhibits progression into anaphase in response to improper kinetochore-microtubule interactions. In addition, BubR1 also helps stabilize kinetochore-microtubule interactions by counteracting the Aurora B kinase but the mechanism behind this is not clear. Here we show that BubR1 directly binds to the B56 family of protein phosphatase 2A (PP2A) regulatory subunits through a conserved motif that is phosphorylated by cyclin-dependent kinase 1 (Cdk1) and polo-like kinase 1 (Plk1). Two highly conserved hydrophobic residues surrounding the serine 670 Cdk1 phosphorylation site are required for B56 binding. Mutation of these residues prevents the establishment of a proper metaphase plate and delays cells in mitosis. Furthermore, we show that phosphorylation of serines 670 and 676 stimulates the binding of B56 to BubR1 and that BubR1 targets a pool of B56 to kinetochores. Our data suggest that BubR1 counteracts Aurora B kinase activity at improperly attached kinetochores by recruiting B56-PP2A phosphatase complexes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23345399     DOI: 10.1242/jcs.122481

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Cell Sci        ISSN: 0021-9533            Impact factor:   5.285


  95 in total

Review 1.  The spindle assembly checkpoint promotes chromosome bi-orientation: A novel Mad1 role in chromosome alignment.

Authors:  Takashi Akera; Yoshinori Watanabe
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

2.  Mitotic phosphatase activity is required for MCC maintenance during the spindle checkpoint.

Authors:  Kristen M Foss; Alexander C Robeson; Sally Kornbluth; Liguo Zhang
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2016       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 3.  Polo-like kinases: structural variations lead to multiple functions.

Authors:  Sihem Zitouni; Catarina Nabais; Swadhin Chandra Jana; Adán Guerrero; Mónica Bettencourt-Dias
Journal:  Nat Rev Mol Cell Biol       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 94.444

4.  Distinct Roles of the Chromosomal Passenger Complex in the Detection of and Response to Errors in Kinetochore-Microtubule Attachment.

Authors:  Julian Haase; Mary Kate Bonner; Hyunmi Halas; Alexander E Kelly
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2017-09-25       Impact factor: 12.270

Review 5.  The kinetochore.

Authors:  Iain M Cheeseman
Journal:  Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol       Date:  2014-07-01       Impact factor: 10.005

Review 6.  Connecting the microtubule attachment status of each kinetochore to cell cycle arrest through the spindle assembly checkpoint.

Authors:  P Todd Stukenberg; Daniel J Burke
Journal:  Chromosoma       Date:  2015-04-28       Impact factor: 4.316

7.  Mitotic kinases and phosphatases cooperate to shape the right response.

Authors:  Giulia Vallardi; Adrian T Saurin
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2015       Impact factor: 4.534

8.  A tension-independent mechanism reduces Aurora B-mediated phosphorylation upon microtubule capture by CENP-E at the kinetochore.

Authors:  Carmen Taveras; Chenshu Liu; Yinghui Mao
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2019-05-23       Impact factor: 4.534

Review 9.  Playing polo during mitosis: PLK1 takes the lead.

Authors:  G Combes; I Alharbi; L G Braga; S Elowe
Journal:  Oncogene       Date:  2017-04-24       Impact factor: 9.867

10.  BuGZ is required for Bub3 stability, Bub1 kinetochore function, and chromosome alignment.

Authors:  Chad M Toledo; Jacob A Herman; Jonathan B Olsen; Yu Ding; Philip Corrin; Emily J Girard; James M Olson; Andrew Emili; Jennifer G DeLuca; Patrick J Paddison
Journal:  Dev Cell       Date:  2014-01-23       Impact factor: 12.270

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.