PURPOSE: To determine the minimum number of supervised transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) that intensivists should perform to reach competence in performing and interpreting a comprehensive hemodynamic assessment in ventilated intensive care unit patients. METHODS: Prospective and multicentric study. Skills of 41 intensivists (trainees) with no (level 0) or little (level 1) experience in echocardiography was evaluated over a 6-month period, using a previously validated skills assessment score (/40 points). Trainees were evaluated at 1 (M1), 3 (M3) and 6 months (M6) by their tutor while performing 2 TEE examinations in ventilated patients. Competence was a priori defined by a skills assessment score >35/40 points. RESULTS: No difference in the score was observed between level 0 and level 1, except at M1 (22.2 ± 6.2 vs. 25.9 ± 4.4 points, p = 0.03). After 6 months, trainees performed a mean of 31 ± 9 supervised TEE. The score gradually increased from M1 to M6 (24 ± 6, 32 ± 3, and 35 ± 3 points, p < 0.001), regardless of trainees' initial level. A correlation was found between the number of supervised TEE and the skills assessment score (r (2) = 0.60; p < 0.001). The number of supervised TEE examinations which best predicted a score >35/40 points was 25, with a sensitivity of 81 % and a specificity of 93 % (area under the ROC curve: 0.91 ± 0.04). A number of 31 supervised TEE examinations predicted a score >35/40 points with a specificity close to 100 %. CONCLUSION: The performance of at least 31 supervised examinations over 6 months is required to reach competence in TEE driven hemodynamic evaluation of ventilated patient.
PURPOSE: To determine the minimum number of supervised transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) that intensivists should perform to reach competence in performing and interpreting a comprehensive hemodynamic assessment in ventilated intensive care unit patients. METHODS: Prospective and multicentric study. Skills of 41 intensivists (trainees) with no (level 0) or little (level 1) experience in echocardiography was evaluated over a 6-month period, using a previously validated skills assessment score (/40 points). Trainees were evaluated at 1 (M1), 3 (M3) and 6 months (M6) by their tutor while performing 2 TEE examinations in ventilated patients. Competence was a priori defined by a skills assessment score >35/40 points. RESULTS: No difference in the score was observed between level 0 and level 1, except at M1 (22.2 ± 6.2 vs. 25.9 ± 4.4 points, p = 0.03). After 6 months, trainees performed a mean of 31 ± 9 supervised TEE. The score gradually increased from M1 to M6 (24 ± 6, 32 ± 3, and 35 ± 3 points, p < 0.001), regardless of trainees' initial level. A correlation was found between the number of supervised TEE and the skills assessment score (r (2) = 0.60; p < 0.001). The number of supervised TEE examinations which best predicted a score >35/40 points was 25, with a sensitivity of 81 % and a specificity of 93 % (area under the ROC curve: 0.91 ± 0.04). A number of 31 supervised TEE examinations predicted a score >35/40 points with a specificity close to 100 %. CONCLUSION: The performance of at least 31 supervised examinations over 6 months is required to reach competence in TEE driven hemodynamic evaluation of ventilated patient.
Authors: Miguel A Quiñones; Pamela S Douglas; Elyse Foster; John Gorcsan; Jannet F Lewis; Alan S Pearlman; Jack Rychik; Ernesto E Salcedo; James B Seward; J Geoffrey Stevenson; Daniel M Thys; Howard H Weitz; William A Zoghbi Journal: J Am Coll Cardiol Date: 2003-02-19 Impact factor: 24.094
Authors: Cyril Charron; Gwenaël Prat; Vincent Caille; Guillaume Belliard; Montaine Lefèvre; Philippe Aegerter; Jean-Michel Boles; François Jardin; Antoine Vieillard-Baron Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-08-16 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Paul H Mayo; Yannick Beaulieu; Peter Doelken; David Feller-Kopman; Christopher Harrod; Adolfo Kaplan; John Oropello; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Olivier Axler; Daniel Lichtenstein; Eric Maury; Michel Slama; Philippe Vignon Journal: Chest Date: 2009-02-02 Impact factor: 9.410
Authors: Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Michel Slama; Bernard Cholley; Gérard Janvier; Philippe Vignon Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2007-11-09 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Michael Bernhard; Cornelius J Busch; Christian Hainer; Moritz N Wente; Karoline Scheuren; Helmut Rauch; Eike Martin; Markus A Weigand Journal: Resuscitation Date: 2009-07-05 Impact factor: 5.262
Authors: Philippe Vignon; Ali AitHssain; Bruno François; Pierre-Marie Preux; Nicolas Pichon; Marc Clavel; Jean-Pierre Frat; Hervé Gastinne Journal: Crit Care Date: 2008-02-19 Impact factor: 9.097
Authors: P Mayo; R Arntfield; M Balik; P Kory; G Mathis; G Schmidt; M Slama; G Volpicelli; N Xirouchaki; A McLean; A Vieillard-Baron Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2017-03-07 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Philippe Vignon; Benjamin Pegot; François Dalmay; Vanessa Jean-Michel; Simon Bocher; Erwan L'her; Jérôme Cros; Gwenaël Prat Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2018-06-21 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Giuseppe Citerio; Jan Bakker; Matteo Bassetti; Dominique Benoit; Maurizio Cecconi; J Randall Curtis; Glenn Hernandez; Margaret Herridge; Samir Jaber; Michael Joannidis; Laurent Papazian; Mark Peters; Pierre Singer; Martin Smith; Marcio Soares; Antoni Torres; Antoine Vieillard-Baron; Jean-François Timsit; Elie Azoulay Journal: Intensive Care Med Date: 2013-12-13 Impact factor: 17.440
Authors: Gwénaël Prat; Cyril Charron; Xavier Repesse; Pierre Coriat; Pierre Bailly; Erwan L'her; Antoine Vieillard-Baron Journal: Ann Intensive Care Date: 2016-04-07 Impact factor: 6.925
Authors: Luca Cioccari; Hans-Rudolf Baur; David Berger; Jan Wiegand; Jukka Takala; Tobias M Merz Journal: Crit Care Date: 2013-03-27 Impact factor: 9.097