Literature DB >> 23344628

Addressing statistical and operational challenges in designing large-scale stream condition surveys.

Melissa J Dobbie1, Peter Negus.   

Abstract

Implementing a statistically valid and practical monitoring design for large-scale stream condition monitoring and assessment programs can be difficult due to factors including the likely existence of a diversity of ecosystem types such as ephemeral streams over the sampling domain; limited resources to undertake detailed monitoring surveys and address knowledge gaps; and operational constraints on effective sampling at monitoring sites. In statistical speak, these issues translate to defining appropriate target populations and sampling units; designing appropriate spatial and temporal sample site selection methods; selection and use of appropriate indicators; and setting effect sizes with limited ecological and statistical information about the indicators of interest. We identify the statistical and operational challenges in designing large-scale stream condition surveys and discuss general approaches for addressing them. The ultimate aim in drawing attention to these challenges is to ensure operational practicality in carrying out future monitoring programs and that the resulting inferences about stream condition are statistically valid and relevant.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23344628     DOI: 10.1007/s10661-013-3097-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Monit Assess        ISSN: 0167-6369            Impact factor:   2.513


  8 in total

Review 1.  Review of environmental monitoring methods: survey designs.

Authors:  Trent L McDonald
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2003-07       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 2.  Watershed-based survey designs.

Authors:  Naomi E Detenbeck; Dan Cincotta; Judith M Denver; Susan K Greenlee; Anthony R Olsen; Ann M Pitchford
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 2.513

3.  Using GIS to generate spatially balanced random survey designs for natural resource applications.

Authors:  David M Theobald; Don L Stevens; Denis White; N Scott Urquhart; Anthony R Olsen; John B Norman
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  2007-05-22       Impact factor: 3.266

4.  Integrating probabalistic and targeted compliance monitoring for comprehensive watershed assessment.

Authors:  Eric D Stein; Brock Bernstein
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2007-09-27       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 5.  A review of potential methods of determining critical effect size for designing environmental monitoring programs.

Authors:  Kelly R Munkittrick; Collin J Arens; Richard B Lowell; Greg P Kaminski
Journal:  Environ Toxicol Chem       Date:  2009-02-06       Impact factor: 3.742

6.  Framework for designing sampling programs.

Authors:  W A Maher; P W Cullen; R H Norris
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  1994-04       Impact factor: 2.513

Review 7.  Statistical approaches used to assess and redesign surface water-quality-monitoring networks.

Authors:  B Khalil; T B M J Ouarda
Journal:  J Environ Monit       Date:  2009-10-05

8.  ENVIRONMENTAL AUDITING: Assessing Biotic Integrity of Streams: Effects of Scale in Measuring the Influence of Land Use/Cover and Habitat Structure on Fish and Macroinvertebrates.

Authors: 
Journal:  Environ Manage       Date:  1999-02       Impact factor: 3.266

  8 in total
  2 in total

1.  An evaluation of potential sampling locations in a reservoir with emphasis on conserved spatial correlation structure.

Authors:  Firdes Yenilmez; Sebnem Düzgün; Aysegül Aksoy
Journal:  Environ Monit Assess       Date:  2014-12-20       Impact factor: 2.513

2.  Application of a novel modeling tool with multistressor functionality to support management of organic contaminants in the Baltic Sea.

Authors:  Emma Undeman; Bo G Gustafsson; Christoph Humborg; Michael S McLachlan
Journal:  Ambio       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 5.129

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.