Literature DB >> 23344287

Surgical treatment of vaginal apex prolapse.

Mark D Walters1, Beri M Ridgeway.   

Abstract

Pelvic organ prolapse is a common problem in women that increases with age and adversely affects quality of life and sexual function. If conservative treatments fail, surgery becomes the main option for symptom abatement. For uterovaginal prolapse, treatment with or without hysterectomy can be offered, and operations must include a specific apical support procedure to be effective. Operations for apical prolapse include transvaginal, open, and laparoscopic or robotic options; few clinical trials have compared the effectiveness and risk of these various surgeries. Grafts can be used selectively for apical suspensions and may improve cure rates but also increase risk of some complications. Slings should be added selectively to reduce postoperative stress incontinence. For women interested in future sexual activity who require apical prolapse surgery, we suggest using transvaginal apical repairs for older patients, those with primary or less severe prolapse, and those at increased surgical risk. We recommend sacral colpopexy with polypropylene mesh (preferably by minimally invasive route) in younger women, those with more severe prolapse or recurrences after vaginal surgery, and women with prolapsed, short vaginas. In older women with severe prolapse who are not interested in sexual activity, obliterative operations are very effective and have high satisfaction rates. An interactive consent process is mandatory, because many decisions-about route of surgery; use of hysterectomy, slings, and grafts; and vaginal capacity for sexual intercourse-require an informed patient's input. Selective referral to specialists in Female Pelvic medicine and Reconstructive Surgery can be considered for complex and recurrent cases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23344287     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827f415c

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  7 in total

Review 1.  Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Alexandriah N Alas; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Utilization of apical vaginal support procedures at time of inpatient hysterectomy performed for benign conditions: a national estimate.

Authors:  Whitney Trotter Ross; Melanie R Meister; Jonathan P Shepherd; Margaret A Olsen; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2017-07-14       Impact factor: 8.661

3.  Apical support at the time of hysterectomy for uterovaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Kelly L Kantartzis; Lindsay C Turner; Jonathan P Shepherd; Li Wang; Daniel G Winger; Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-09-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 4.  Recurrent pelvic organ prolapse: International Urogynecological Association Research and Development Committee opinion.

Authors:  Sharif Ismail; Jonathan Duckett; Diaa Rizk; Olanrewaju Sorinola; Dorothy Kammerer-Doak; Oscar Contreras-Ortiz; Hazem Al-Mandeel; Kamil Svabik; Mitesh Parekh; Christian Phillips
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-07-05       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Ligament shortening compared to vaginal colpopexy at the time of hysterectomy for pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Pamela S Fairchild; Neil S Kamdar; Emily R Rosen; Carolyn W Swenson; Dee E Fenner; John O DeLancey; Daniel M Morgan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-11-17       Impact factor: 2.894

6.  Apical Vaginal Support: The Often Forgotten Piece of the Puzzle.

Authors:  Jerry L Lowder
Journal:  Mo Med       Date:  2017 May-Jun

Review 7.  Clinical challenges in the management of vaginal prolapse.

Authors:  Nazema Y Siddiqui; Autumn L Edenfield
Journal:  Int J Womens Health       Date:  2014-01-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.