Literature DB >> 23344277

Obliterative LeFort colpocleisis in a large group of elderly women.

Salomon Zebede1, Aimee L Smith, Leon N Plowright, Aparna Hegde, Vivian C Aguilar, G Willy Davila.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To report on anatomical and functional outcomes, patient satisfaction, and associated morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing LeFort colpocleisis.
METHODS: This was a retrospective case series of LeFort colpocleisis performed from January 2000 to October 2011. Data obtained from a urogynecologic database included demographics, comorbidities, medications, and urinary and bowel symptoms. Prolapse was quantified using the pelvic organ prolapse quantification (POP-Q) examination. Operative characteristics were recorded. All patients underwent pelvic examination and POP-Q assessment at follow-up visits. Patients also were asked about urinary and bowel symptoms as well as overall satisfaction. All intraoperative and postoperative surgical complications were recorded.
RESULTS: Three hundred twenty-five patients underwent LeFort colpocleisis. Fifteen patients were excluded from the analysis because of incomplete data. The mean age was 81.3±5.3 years. Comorbidities were common, with 74.1% of the patients having at least one concomitant medical condition. The procedure was performed under spinal anesthesia in 67%. Additional procedures at the time of colpocleisis included incontinence procedures (79%) and dilation and curettage (46%). Mean follow-up was 45 (range 2-392) weeks. Anatomical success rate was 98.1% and patients were highly satisfied, with 92.9% reported being "cured" or "greatly improved." Complication and mortality rates were 15.2% and 1.3%, respectively.
CONCLUSION: Colpocleisis is an effective and low-risk procedure with high anatomical success rates and patient satisfaction. Associated morbidity and mortality related to the procedure are low. Colpocleisis remains an excellent surgical option for the elderly patient with advanced pelvic organ prolapse. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: III.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23344277     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e31827d8fdb

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  19 in total

Review 1.  Management of apical pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Alexandriah N Alas; Jennifer T Anger
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2015-05       Impact factor: 3.092

2.  Perioperative complications following colpocleisis with and without concomitant vaginal hysterectomy.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bochenska; Alix Leader-Cramer; Margaret Mueller; Bhumy Davé; Alexandria Alverdy; Kimberly Kenton
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2017-05-03       Impact factor: 2.894

3.  Total colpocleisis: technical considerations.

Authors:  Brian J Linder; John B Gebhart; John A Occhino
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-05-14       Impact factor: 2.894

4.  Hysterectomy at the time of colpocleisis: a decision analysis.

Authors:  Keisha A Jones; Yueran Zhuo; Senay Solak; Oz Harmanli
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2015-12-12       Impact factor: 2.894

5.  Long-term follow-up after colpocleisis: regret, bowel, and bladder function.

Authors:  M Vij; L Bombieri; A Dua; R Freeman
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2014-01-22       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 6.  Prolapse Repair Using Non-synthetic Material: What is the Current Standard?

Authors:  Ricardo Palmerola; Nirit Rosenblum
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-10-14       Impact factor: 3.092

7.  Joint report on terminology for surgical procedures to treat pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors: 
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2020-03       Impact factor: 2.894

Review 8.  Failure of Expectations in Vaginal Surgery: Lack of Appropriate Consent, Goals and Expectations of Surgery.

Authors:  Debjyoti Karmakar; Peter L Dwyer
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-12       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 9.  Enlightening the mechanisms of POP recurrence after LeFort colpocleisis. Case report and review.

Authors:  Themistoklis Mikos; Mariliz Chatzipanteli; Grigoris F Grimbizis; Basil C Tarlatzis
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2016-12-26       Impact factor: 2.894

10.  Quality of life following vaginal reconstructive versus obliterative surgery for treating advanced pelvic organ prolapse.

Authors:  Alin Petcharopas; Supreeya Wongtra-Ngan; Orawee Chinthakanan
Journal:  Int Urogynecol J       Date:  2018-01-27       Impact factor: 2.894

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.