CONTEXT: There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal timing for tracheal extubation in children at increased risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events, particularly following adenotonsillectomy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events in children undergoing elective adenotonsillectomy extubated under deep anaesthesia or when fully awake. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised controlled trial. SETTING:Tertiary paediatric hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred children (<16 years), with at least one risk factor for perioperative respiratory adverse events (current or recent upper respiratory tract infection in the past 2 weeks, eczema, wheezing in the past 12 months, dry nocturnal cough, wheezing on exercise, family history of asthma, eczema or hay fever as well as passive smoking). INTERVENTION: Deep or awake extubation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events (laryngospasm, bronchospasm, persistent coughing, airway obstruction, desaturation <95%). RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups with regard to age, medical and surgical parameters. The overall incidence of complications did not differ between the two groups; tracheal extubation in fully awake children was associated with a greater incidence of persistent coughing (60 vs. 35%, P = 0.028), whereas the incidence of airway obstruction relieved by simple airway manoeuvres in children extubated while deeply anaesthetised was greater (26 vs. 8%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in the incidence of oxygen desaturation lasting more than 10 s. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the overall incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Both extubation techniques may be used in high-risk children undergoing adenotonsillectomy provided that the child is monitored closely in the postoperative period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000387224.
RCT Entities:
CONTEXT: There is ongoing debate regarding the optimal timing for tracheal extubation in children at increased risk of perioperative respiratory adverse events, particularly following adenotonsillectomy. OBJECTIVE: To assess the occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events in children undergoing elective adenotonsillectomy extubated under deep anaesthesia or when fully awake. DESIGN: Prospective, randomised controlled trial. SETTING: Tertiary paediatric hospital. PATIENTS: One hundred children (<16 years), with at least one risk factor for perioperative respiratory adverse events (current or recent upper respiratory tract infection in the past 2 weeks, eczema, wheezing in the past 12 months, dry nocturnal cough, wheezing on exercise, family history of asthma, eczema or hay fever as well as passive smoking). INTERVENTION: Deep or awake extubation. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE: The occurrence of perioperative respiratory adverse events (laryngospasm, bronchospasm, persistent coughing, airway obstruction, desaturation <95%). RESULTS: There were no differences between the two groups with regard to age, medical and surgical parameters. The overall incidence of complications did not differ between the two groups; tracheal extubation in fully awake children was associated with a greater incidence of persistent coughing (60 vs. 35%, P = 0.028), whereas the incidence of airway obstruction relieved by simple airway manoeuvres in children extubated while deeply anaesthetised was greater (26 vs. 8%, P = 0.03). There was no difference in the incidence of oxygen desaturation lasting more than 10 s. CONCLUSION: There was no difference in the overall incidence of perioperative respiratory adverse events. Both extubation techniques may be used in high-risk children undergoing adenotonsillectomy provided that the child is monitored closely in the postoperative period. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry: ACTRN12609000387224.
Authors: T Wesley Templeton; Eduardo J Goenaga-Díaz; Martina G Downard; Christopher J McLouth; Timothy E Smith; Leah B Templeton; Shelly H Pecorella; Dudley E Hammon; James J O'Brien; Douglas H McLaughlin; Ann E Lawrence; Phillip R Tennant; Douglas G Ririe Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2019-10 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Britta S von Ungern-Sternberg; David Sommerfield; Lliana Slevin; Thomas F E Drake-Brockman; Guicheng Zhang; Graham L Hall Journal: JAMA Pediatr Date: 2019-06-01 Impact factor: 16.193
Authors: Jeremy Juang; Martha Cordoba; Alex Ciaramella; Mark Xiao; Jeremy Goldfarb; Jorge Enrique Bayter; Alvaro Andres Macias Journal: BMC Anesthesiol Date: 2020-10-29 Impact factor: 2.217