Literature DB >> 23343905

An electroolfactogram study of odor response patterns from the mouse olfactory epithelium with reference to receptor zones and odor sorptiveness.

D M Coppola1, C T Waggener, S M Radwani, D A Brooks.   

Abstract

Olfactory sensory neuron (OSN) responses to odors, measured at the population level, tend to be spatially heterogeneous in the vertebrates that have been studied. These response patterns vary between odors but are similar across subjects for a given stimulus. However, few species have been studied making functional interpretation of these patterns problematic. One proximate explanation for the spatial heterogeneity of odor responses comes from evidence that olfactory receptor (OR) genes in rodents are expressed in OSN populations that are spatially restricted to a few zones in the olfactory epithelium (OE). A long-standing functional explanation for response anisotropy in the OE posits that it is the signature of a supplementary mechanism for quality coding, based on the sorptive properties of odor molecules. These theories are difficult to assess because most mapping studies have utilized few odors, provided little replication, or involved but a single species (rat). In fact, to our knowledge, a detailed olfactory response "map" has not been reported for mouse, the species used in most studies of gene localization. Here we report the results of a study of mouse OE response patterns using the electroolfactogram (EOG). We focused on the medial aspect of olfactory turbinates that are accessible in the midsagittal section. This limited approach still allowed us to test predictions derived from the zonal distribution of OSN types and the sorption hypothesis. In 3 separate experiments, 290 mice were used to record EOGs from a set of standard locations along each of 4 endoturbinates utilizing 11 different odors resulting in over 4,400 separate recordings. Our results confirmed a marked spatial heterogeneity in odor responses that varied with odor, as seen in other species. However, no discontinuities were found in the odor-specific response patterns across the OE as might have been predicted given the existence of classical receptor zones nor did we find clear support for the hypothesis that OE response patterns, presumably a reflection of OSN distribution, have been shaped through natural selection by the relative sorptive properties of odors. We propose that receptor zones may be an epiphenomenon of a contingent evolutionary process. In this formulation, constraints on developmental programs for distributing OSN classes within the OE may be minimally related to the odor ligands of specific class members. Further, we propose that odor sorptiveness, which appears to be correlated with the inherent response patterns in the OE of larger species, may be of minimal effect in mice owing to scaling issues.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23343905     DOI: 10.1152/jn.00769.2012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  10 in total

Review 1.  Forever young: Neoteny, neurogenesis and a critique of critical periods in olfaction.

Authors:  David M Coppola; Leonard E White
Journal:  J Bioenerg Biomembr       Date:  2018-11-12       Impact factor: 2.945

2.  Tuning to odor solubility and sorption pattern in olfactory epithelial responses.

Authors:  John W Scott; Lisa Sherrill; Jianbo Jiang; Kai Zhao
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  2014-02-05       Impact factor: 6.167

Review 3.  Diving into the streams and waves of constitutive and regenerative olfactory neurogenesis: insights from zebrafish.

Authors:  Erika Calvo-Ochoa; Christine A Byrd-Jacobs; Stefan H Fuss
Journal:  Cell Tissue Res       Date:  2020-11-27       Impact factor: 5.249

4.  Tests of the sorption and olfactory "fovea" hypotheses in the mouse.

Authors:  David M Coppola; Brittaney E Ritchie; Brent A Craven
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2017-09-06       Impact factor: 2.714

5.  Compensatory plasticity in the olfactory epithelium: age, timing, and reversibility.

Authors:  Casey N Barber; David M Coppola
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2015-08-12       Impact factor: 2.714

6.  A 3D transcriptomics atlas of the mouse nose sheds light on the anatomical logic of smell.

Authors:  Mayra L Ruiz Tejada Segura; Eman Abou Moussa; Elisa Garabello; Thiago S Nakahara; Melanie Makhlouf; Lisa S Mathew; Li Wang; Filippo Valle; Susie S Y Huang; Joel D Mainland; Michele Caselle; Matteo Osella; Stephan Lorenz; Johannes Reisert; Darren W Logan; Bettina Malnic; Antonio Scialdone; Luis R Saraiva
Journal:  Cell Rep       Date:  2022-03-22       Impact factor: 9.423

7.  Tracking of unfamiliar odors is facilitated by signal amplification through anoctamin 2 chloride channels in mouse olfactory receptor neurons.

Authors:  Franziska Neureither; Nadine Stowasser; Stephan Frings; Frank Möhrlen
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2017-08

8.  Pleasantness and trigeminal sensations as salient dimensions in organizing the semantic and physiological spaces of odors.

Authors:  C C Licon; C Manesse; M Dantec; A Fournel; M Bensafi
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-05-31       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Tests of the chromatographic theory of olfaction with highly soluble odors: a combined electro-olfactogram and computational fluid dynamics study in the mouse.

Authors:  David M Coppola; Emily Fitzwater; Alex D Rygg; Brent A Craven
Journal:  Biol Open       Date:  2019-10-24       Impact factor: 2.422

10.  TRPM5-expressing Microvillous Cells Regulate Region-specific Cell Proliferation and Apoptosis During Chemical Exposure.

Authors:  Kayla Lemons; Ziying Fu; Tatsuya Ogura; Weihong Lin
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2020-03-26       Impact factor: 3.590

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.