Literature DB >> 23342575

Malocclusion: social, functional and emotional influence on children.

P A Martins-Júnior1, L S Marques, M L Ramos-Jorge.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the association between types of malocclusion and quality of life in children between 8-10 years of age and establish correlations between the severity of the malocclusion and particular bio-psychosocial variables. STUDY
DESIGN: The sample was made up of 102 schoolchildren aged 8-10 years. Clinical exams were performed using the criteria of the Dental Aesthetic Index (DAI) to determine the presence and severity of malocclusions. The impact on quality of life was assessed using the Child Perceptions Questionnaire (CPQ8-10). Statistical analysis involved the chi-square test, Fisher's exact test and Spearman's correlation analysis.
RESULTS: Malocclusions affected 61% of the children examined. There was a positive correlation between total CPQ8-10 and DAI scores (P = 0.034). The following types of malocclusion had a significant effect on the quality of life of the children: upper anterior irregularity > or = 2 mm, anterior open bite > or = 2 mm and diastema > or = 2 mm. Children with malocclusion experienced a greater negative impact on quality of life in comparison to those without malocclusion.
CONCLUSIONS: Malocclusions had a negative influence over the quality of life of children between 8-10 years of age. More severe malocclusions had a greater impact with regard to social, emotional and functional aspects.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23342575     DOI: 10.17796/jcpd.37.1.y75430328427210j

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Pediatr Dent        ISSN: 1053-4628            Impact factor:   1.065


  15 in total

1.  What is the value of orthodontic treatment?

Authors:  P E Benson; H Javidi; A T DiBiase
Journal:  Br Dent J       Date:  2015-02-16       Impact factor: 1.626

2.  Impact of anterior occlusal conditions in the mixed dentition on oral health-related quality-of-life item levels.

Authors:  Silvia A S Vedovello; Ana Letícia Mello de Carvalho; Larissa C de Azevedo; Patrícia R Dos Santos; Mario Vedovello-Filho; Marcelo de C Meneghim
Journal:  Angle Orthod       Date:  2020-07-01       Impact factor: 2.079

3.  Effect of malocclusion among adolescents on family quality of life.

Authors:  L G Abreu; C A Melgaço; M H N G Abreu; E M B Lages; S M Paiva
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2015-02-21

Review 4.  Assessment of the quality of measures of child oral health-related quality of life.

Authors:  Fiona Gilchrist; Helen Rodd; Chris Deery; Zoe Marshman
Journal:  BMC Oral Health       Date:  2014-04-23       Impact factor: 2.757

5.  The Influence of Abnormalities in the Profile and Overjet on Psychological Well-Being.

Authors:  Emine Kaygısız; Ayşe Bikem Hacıömeroğlu; Sema Yüksel; Mümin Mümin; Tuba Tortop
Journal:  Turk J Orthod       Date:  2021-03-01

6.  Orthodontic treatment need for adolescents in the Campania region: the malocclusion impact on self-concept.

Authors:  Letizia Perillo; Maria Esposito; Alberto Caprioglio; Stefania Attanasio; Annamaria Chiara Santini; Marco Carotenuto
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2014-03-19       Impact factor: 2.711

7.  Perception of parents and caregivers regarding the impact of malocclusion on adolescents' quality of life: a cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Lucas Guimarães Abreu; Camilo Aquino Melgaço; Mauro Henrique Abreu; Elizabeth Maria Bastos Lages; Saul Martins Paiva
Journal:  Dental Press J Orthod       Date:  2016 Nov-Dec

8.  Validation of an Indian (Kannada) translation of the Family Impact Scale questionnaire and the impact of malocclusion on the families of adolescent school children.

Authors:  Kalaiselvi Vinayagamoorthy; Kalyana Chakravarthy Pentapati; Arun Urala; Shashidhar Acharya
Journal:  Int Dent J       Date:  2020-04-07       Impact factor: 2.607

Review 9.  Skeletal malocclusion: a developmental disorder with a life-long morbidity.

Authors:  Nishitha Joshi; Ahmad M Hamdan; Walid D Fakhouri
Journal:  J Clin Med Res       Date:  2014-09-09

10.  Comparing the effectiveness of the 0.018-inch versus the 0.022-inch bracket slot system in orthodontic treatment: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ahmed M F El-Angbawi; David R Bearn; Grant T McIntyre
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2014-10-06       Impact factor: 2.279

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.