Literature DB >> 23342401

Prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by physicians in the UK: a systematic review of surveys.

Paul Posadzki1, Amani Alotaibi, Edzard Ernst.   

Abstract

This systematic review aims to estimate the prevalence of use of complementary and alternative medicine (CAM) by physicians in the UK. Five databases were searched for surveys monitoring the prevalence of use of CAM, which were published between 1 January 1995 and 7 December 2011. In total, 14 papers that reported 13 separate surveys met our inclusion criteria. Most were of poor methodological quality. The average prevalence of use of CAM across all surveys was 20.6% (range 12.1-32%). The average referral rate to CAM was 39% (range 24.6-86%), and CAM was recommended by 46% of physicians (range 38-55%). The average percentage of physicians who had received training in CAM was 10.3% (range 4.8-21%). The three most commonly used methods of CAM were acupuncture, homeopathy and relaxation therapy. A sizable proportion of physicians in the UK seem to employ some type of CAM, yet many have not received any training in CAM. This raises issues related to medical ethics, professional competence and education of physicians.

Mesh:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23342401      PMCID: PMC5922587          DOI: 10.7861/clinmedicine.12-6-505

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Med (Lond)        ISSN: 1470-2118            Impact factor:   2.659


  9 in total

Review 1.  Professional ethics in complementary and alternative medicines in management of Parkinson's disease.

Authors:  Hee Jin Kim; Beomseok Jeon; Sun Ju Chung
Journal:  J Parkinsons Dis       Date:  2016-10-19       Impact factor: 5.568

2.  Meta-Analysis of Combination Therapy of Chinese Herbs Plus Interferon and Ribavirin in Patients with Chronic Hepatitis C.

Authors:  Jianjun Wang; Shaojie Xin; Xueyuan Jin; Yongqian Cheng; Tao Yan; Song Qing; Ning Ding; Ping Zhao
Journal:  Med Sci Monit       Date:  2016-05-30

3.  On the edges of medicine - a qualitative study on the function of complementary, alternative, and non-specific therapies in handling therapeutically indeterminate situations.

Authors:  Agnes Ostermaier; Niklas Barth; Antonius Schneider; Klaus Linde
Journal:  BMC Fam Pract       Date:  2019-04-23       Impact factor: 2.497

4.  Complementary medicine use, views, and experiences: a national survey in England.

Authors:  Debbie Sharp; Ava Lorenc; Richard Morris; Gene Feder; Paul Little; Sandra Hollinghurst; Stewart W Mercer; Hugh MacPherson
Journal:  BJGP Open       Date:  2018-11-14

5.  Complementary and alternative medicine - practice, attitudes, and knowledge among healthcare professionals in New Zealand: an integrative review.

Authors:  Lizhou Liu; Yong Tang; G David Baxter; Haiyan Yin; Steve Tumilty
Journal:  BMC Complement Med Ther       Date:  2021-02-13

6.  An exploration of the needling depth in acupuncture: the safe needling depth and the needling depth of clinical efficacy.

Authors:  Jaung-Geng Lin; Pei-Chi Chou; Heng-Yi Chu
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2013-07-09       Impact factor: 2.629

7.  'Big needles, small bodies'-the absence of acupuncture treatment for infants in contemporary Shanghai: a qualitative study.

Authors:  Holgeir Skjeie; Mette Brekke
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-11-09       Impact factor: 2.692

8.  Integration of Chinese Herbal Medicine Therapy Improves Survival of Patients With Chronic Lymphocytic Leukemia: A Nationwide Population-Based Cohort Study.

Authors:  Tom Fleischer; Tung-Ti Chang; Jen-Huai Chiang; Ching-Yun Hsieh; Mao-Feng Sun; Hung-Rong Yen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

9.  Prevalence of complementary and alternative medicine despite limited perceived efficacy in patients with rheumatic diseases in Mexico: Cross-sectional study.

Authors:  Claudia Isabel Caballero-Hernández; Susana Aideé González-Chávez; Adelfia Urenda-Quezada; Greta Cristina Reyes-Cordero; Ingris Peláez-Ballestas; Everardo Álvarez-Hernández; César Pacheco-Tena
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2021-09-28       Impact factor: 3.240

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.