| Literature DB >> 23341802 |
Kazuya Okushin1, Yoshinari Asaoka, Izumi Fukuda, Naoto Fujiwara, Tatsuya Minami, Masaya Sato, Shintaro Mikami, Koji Uchino, Kenichiro Enooku, Yuji Kondo, Ryosuke Tateishi, Tadashi Goto, Shuichiro Shiina, Haruhiko Yoshida, Kazuhiko Koike.
Abstract
Hypoglycemia is a rare paraneoplastic manifestation of patients with neoplasms. Hypoglycemia can be induced by several causes, including an aberrant increase of hypoglycemic agents and adrenal insufficiency. Sorafenib is the first agent to demonstrate a survival benefit in the treatment of advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This small molecule inhibits serine/threonine kinase RAF in tumor cells and tyrosine kinases VEGFR/PDGFR in tumor vasculature and decreases tumor growth and angiogenesis. In this paper, we report a case of HCC who was treated with sorafenib and showed severe hypoglycemia. This hypoglycemia might be induced by two causes, both adrenal insufficiency as an adverse effect of sorafenib and activation of the insulin-like growth factor (IGF) signal by excessive secretion of incompletely processed precursors of IGF-II. Although the IGF signal is suggested to be involved in aberrant growth of HCC in some cases, there is no other report showing the influence of sorafenib on HCC with active IGF signal. Unfortunately, the effect of sorafenib was limited in the present case. However, emerging drugs that directly inhibit the IGF signal can be expected to be highly effective in the treatment of HCC with hypoglycemia.Entities:
Keywords: Hepatocellular carcinoma; Hypoglycemia; IGF signal; IGF-II; Metabolic complications; Molecular targeting therapy; Sorafenib
Year: 2012 PMID: 23341802 PMCID: PMC3551420 DOI: 10.1159/000346462
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Case Rep Gastroenterol ISSN: 1662-0631
Fig. 1CT scan images before and after the administration of sorafenib. a, b Images before therapy. c, d Images after therapy. By the administration of sorafenib, the size of the liver tumors had not changed (a to c), but the number of lung metastases had increased (b to d).
Fig. 3Changes in the tumor marker levels before and after the administration of sorafenib. By day 14 of sorafenib administration, the tumor marker levels had decreased (AFP from 4,112 to 2,381 ng/ml and PIVKA-II from 4,645 to 952 mAU/ml). However, the effects were transient and the tumor marker levels increased again in spite of the administration of sorafenib.