| Literature DB >> 23341745 |
Hai-Lin Guo1, Ji-Ping Xuan, Jian-Xiu Liu, Yuan-Ming Zhang, Yi-Qi Zheng.
Abstract
Cold tolerance and the green period are key traits in the breeding of zoysiagrass (Zoysia Willd.). Identification of molecular markers associated with cold tolerance and the green period of zoysiagrass will contribute to efficient selection of elite cultivars. These two traits were measured in 96 zoysiagrass accessions in 2004 and 2005-2006, respectively. The mapping population was screened with 29 pairs of simple sequence repeat (SSR) primers and 54 pairs of sequence-related amplified polymorphism (SRAP) primers. A multi-loci in silico mapping approach implemented with an empirical Bayes method was applied for association mapping of cold tolerance and green period. We detected 254 SSR polymorphic loci and 338 SRAP polymorphic loci, among which three SSR loci (Xgwm131-3B-187, Xgwm469-6D-194 and Xgwm234-5B-244) and one SRAP locus (Me11Em7-406) were significantly associated with cold tolerance with effect values of 57.83%, 38.05%, 36.92% and 37%, respectively. Three SSR loci (Xgwm132-6B-225, Xgwm111-7D-34 and Xgwm102-2D-97) and two SRAP loci (Me19Em5-359 and Me16Em8-483) were significantly associated with the green period with effect values of 79.54%, 62.59%, 99.04%, 49.01% and 82.57%. These markers will be useful for genetic improvement of the cold tolerance and green period of zoysiagrass by marker-assisted breeding.Entities:
Keywords: Zoysia; association analysis; cold tolerance; green period; molecular markers
Year: 2012 PMID: 23341745 PMCID: PMC3528328 DOI: 10.1270/jsbbs.62.320
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Breed Sci ISSN: 1344-7610 Impact factor: 2.086
Variation in cold tolerance and green period among the zoysia germplasm analyzed
| Trait | Average | Variance range | CV (%) | Variance | Skewness | Kurtosis |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Cold tolerance (°C) | 6.40 | −1.90–−10.40 | 27.81 | 3.16 | 0.52 | −0.04 |
| Green period (days) | 211.29 | 186.00–251.00 | 7.97 | 283.60 | 0.84 | −0.56 |
SSR and SRAP primer combinations used and the number of polymorphic bands amplified by each combination
| PC | BN | PC | BN | PC | BN | PC | BN | PC | BN |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Xgwm408-5B | 1–12 | Xgwm337-1D | 141–148 | Me18Em2 | 278–285 | Me7Em6 | 360–366 | Me9Em8 | 461–465 |
| Xgwm47-2B | 13–21 | Xgwm44-7D | 149–159 | Me1Em3 | 286–291 | Me8Em6 | 367–373 | Me13Em8 | 466–478 |
| Xgwm111-7D | 22–35 | Xgwm445-2D | 160–169 | Me3Em3 | 292–297 | Me9Em6 | 374–382 | Me16Em8 | 479–490 |
| Xgwm133-6B | 36–47 | Xgwm459-6A | 170–179 | Me6Em3 | 298–303 | Me15Em6 | 383–385 | Me14Em9 | 491–497 |
| Xgwm126-5A | 48–60 | Xgwm131-3B | 180–188 | Me14Em3 | 304–307 | Me16Em6 | 386–390 | Me6Em9 | 498–504 |
| Xgwm183-3D | 61–73 | Xgwm484-2D | 189–193 | Me2Em4 | 308–309 | Me17Em6 | 391–392 | Me15Em9 | 505–519 |
| Xgwm46-7B | 74–84 | Xgwm469-6D | 194–205 | Me11Em4 | 310–315 | Me18Em6 | 393–397 | Me19Em9 | 520–526 |
| Xgwm52-3D | 85–86 | Xgwm154-5A | 206–214 | Me14Em4 | 316–318 | Me7Em7 | 398–401 | Me20Em19 | 527–535 |
| Xgwm249-2D | 87–90 | Xgwm149-4B | 215–223 | Me17Em4 | 319–321 | Me11Em7 | 402–408 | Me4Em10 | 536–543 |
| Xgwm120-2B | 91–93 | Xgwm132-6B | 224–233 | Me19Em4 | 322–328 | Me15Em7 | 409–412 | Me9Em10 | 544–545 |
| Xgwm102-2D | 94–97 | Xgwm129-5A | 234–243 | Me2Em5 | 329–333 | Me17Em7 | 413–419 | Me13Em10 | 546–552 |
| Xgwm350-7A | 98–101 | Xgwm234-5B | 244–254 | Me3Em5 | 334–341 | Me1Em8 | 420–427 | Me14Em10 | 553–560 |
| Xgwm37-7D | 102–105 | Me18Em1 | 255–258 | Me5Em5 | 342–345 | Me3Em8 | 428–432 | Me16Em10 | 561–572 |
| Xgwm210-2D | 106–114 | Me19Em1 | 259–265 | Me11Em5 | 346–348 | Me4Em8 | 433–438 | Me17Em10 | 573–587 |
| Xgwm344-7B | 115–126 | Me7Em2 | 266–272 | Me13Em5 | 349–353 | Me6Em8 | 439–441 | Me19Em10 | 588–592 |
| Xgwm135-1A | 127–132 | Me10Em2 | 273–275 | Me17Em5 | 354–355 | Me7Em8 | 442–449 | ||
| Xgwm60-7A | 133–140 | Me11Em2 | 276–277 | Me19Em5 | 356–359 | Me8Em8 | 450–460 |
Primer combinations.
Number of unambiguous bands. Band numbers 1–592 represent all polymorphic fragments amplified by the 29 SSR and 54 SRAP primer combination; bands were numbered consecutively according to the number of polymorphic fragments of each primer.
Marker loci associated with cold tolerance and their effect values
| Marker locus | Effect index | Effect and LOD values in different classification scenarios (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| PD | NTSYS2 | NTSYS3 | NTSYS4 | NTSYS5 | NTSYS6 | ||
| Xgwm131-3B-187 | Effect value | 64.83 | 62.37 | 62.68 | 54.77 | 47.79 | 54.54 |
| LOD value | 9.1745 | 11.1916 | 11.3157 | 8.3148 | 7.0023 | 8.8103 | |
| Xgwm469-6D-194 | Effect value | 48.89 | 31.27 | 31.97 | 34.61 | 38.91 | 42.66 |
| LOD value | 6.9500 | 4.0026 | 4.1430 | 4.7482 | 5.9676 | 6.5833 | |
| Xgwm234-5B-244 | Effect value | 50.63 | 37.79 | 38.22 | 34.66 | 35.75 | 24.47 |
| LOD value | 7.5044 | 4.7026 | 4.7979 | 4.6710 | 5.2224 | 2.4858 | |
| Me11Em7-406 | Effect value | 33.18 | 38.23 | 38.78 | 36.19 | 47.06 | 28.56 |
| LOD value | 3.7359 | 5.4337 | 5.5675 | 5.0101 | 8.3796 | 3.4023 | |
| Xgwm111-7D-29 | Effect value | / | / | / | / | 0.1719 | / |
| LOD value | / | / | / | / | 2.1531 | / | |
| Xgwm 44-7D-156 | Effect value | / | / | / | / | / | 0.2207 |
| LOD value | / | / | / | / | / | 2.4589 | |
| Xgwm 459-6A-170 | Effect value | / | / | / | / | / | 0.1814 |
| LOD value | / | / | / | / | / | 2.0660 | |
| Xgwm 131-3B-181 | Effect value | / | 0.1781 | 0.1798 | / | / | 0.2505 |
| LOD value | / | 1.9272 | 1.9434 | / | / | 2.6822 | |
| Xgwm 234-5B-247 | Effect value | 0.3926 | / | / | / | / | / |
| LOD value | 4.4632 | / | / | / | / | / | |
| Xgwm 234-5B-251 | Effect value | / | / | / | 0.2342 | 0.2609 | / |
| LOD value | / | / | / | 1.8941 | 2.0933 | / | |
| Me6Em3-298 | Effect value | / | / | / | / | / | / |
| LOD value | / | / | / | / | / | / | |
| Me17Em4-319 | Effect value | 0.1657 | / | / | / | / | / |
| LOD value | 1.8350 | / | / | / | / | / | |
| Me11Em5-346 | Effect value | 0.2114 | / | / | / | / | / |
| LOD value | 2.1685 | / | / | / | / | / | |
| Me11Em5-347 | Effect value | / | / | / | / | 0.1630 | / |
| LOD value | / | / | / | / | 1.8947 | / | |
| Me15Em9-513 | Effect value | / | / | / | / | 0.1769 | / |
| LOD value | / | / | / | / | 2.1288 | / | |
PD: Preliminary data; NTSYS2–NTSYS6: samples were classified into two to six subpopulations, respectively, with NTSYS 2.1 software (Fig. 1); “/” indicates that no relationship was detected.
Log of odds.
Fig. 1Cluster dendrogram of 96 zoysia accessions derived from SSR and SRAP marker data. The samples were classified into two to six sub-populations (indicated by the lines L1, L2, L3, L4 and L5, respectively).
Marker loci associated with the green period and their effective values
| Marker locus | Effect index | Effect and LOD values in different classification scenarios (%) | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| |||||||
| PD | NTSYS2 | NTSYS3 | NTSYS4 | NTSYS5 | NTSYS6 | ||
| Xgwm132-6B-225 | Effect value | 98.2406 | 93.2255 | 83.8477 | 79.0975 | 74.2881 | 48.5142 |
| LOD value | 35.0189 | 35.8957 | 30.2078 | 27.8028 | 24.9249 | 17.0597 | |
| Xgwm111-7D-34 | Effect value | 108.7786 | 51.6155 | 49.7738 | 51.5910 | 51.1867 | / |
| LOD value | 43.6171 | 11.6639 | 11.4626 | 12.5827 | 12.5295 | / | |
| Me19Em5-359 | Effect value | 128.7573 | 82.6624 | 94.2179 | 94.5319 | 95.0466 | / |
| LOD value | 62.1712 | 30.6400 | 40.4845 | 41.9178 | 42.7840 | / | |
| Xgwm102-2D-97 | Effect value | 70.1827 | / | 47.1381 | 48.8265 | 48.2772 | 30.6498 |
| LOD value | 20.2235 | / | 11.3625 | 12.4411 | 12.3045 | 8.0491 | |
| Me16Em8-483 | Effect value | / | 87.4651 | 82.6829 | 78.1395 | 81.9773 | / |
| LOD value | / | 32.6587 | 30.4267 | 28.1032 | 31.1136 | / | |
| Xgwm111-7D-35 | Effect value | / | 57.7778 | / | / | / | / |
| LOD value | / | 15.7874 | / | / | / | / | |
| Me18Em1-258 | Effect value | 79.0763 | / | / | / | / | / |
| LOD value | 24.6668 | / | / | / | / | / | |
PD: Preliminary data; NTSYS2–NTSYS6: samples were classified into two to six subpopulations, respectively, with NTSYS 2.1 software; “/” indicates that no relationship was detected.
Log of odds.