AIMS: To explore the potentiality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in the quantitative evaluation of mitral valve annulus (MVA) and tricuspid valve annulus (TVA) morphology and dynamics. METHODS AND RESULTS: CMR was performed in 13 normal subjects and 9 patients with mitral (n = 7) or tricuspid regurgitation (n = 2), acquiring cine-images in 18 radial long-axis planes passing through the middle of MVA or TVA. A novel algorithm was used to obtain dynamic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of MVA and TVA. Analysis was feasible in all cases, allowing accurate 3D annular reconstruction and tracking. The 3D area increased from systole [MVA, median = 10.0 cm(2) (first quartile = 8.6, third quartile = 11.4); TVA, 11.2 cm(2) (8.8-13.2)] to diastole [MVA, 10.6 cm(2) (9.4, 11.7); TVA, 11.9 cm(2) (9.2-13.5)], with TVA larger than MVA. While the longest diameter showed similar systolic and diastolic values, the shortest diameter elongated from systole [MVA, 30 mm (29-33); TVA, 33 mm (31-36)] to diastole [MVA, 31 mm (29-32); TVA, 36 mm (33-39)]. Also, TVA became more circular than MVA. TVA showed lower peak systolic excursion in the septal [15.9 mm (13.0-18.5)] and anterior regions [17.9 mm (12.2-20.7)] compared with the posterior [21.9 mm (18.6-24.0)] segment. Values in MVA were smaller than in TVA, slightly higher in anterior [11.2 mm (9.5-13.0)] than in posterior [12.4 mm (10.2-14.6)] segments. Valvular regurgitation was associated with enlarged, flattened, and more circular annuli. CONCLUSION: The applied method was feasible and accurate in normal and regurgitant valves, and may potentially have an impact on diagnosis, improvement of surgical techniques and design of annular prostheses.
AIMS: To explore the potentiality of cardiovascular magnetic resonance (CMR) in the quantitative evaluation of mitral valve annulus (MVA) and tricuspid valve annulus (TVA) morphology and dynamics. METHODS AND RESULTS: CMR was performed in 13 normal subjects and 9 patients with mitral (n = 7) or tricuspid regurgitation (n = 2), acquiring cine-images in 18 radial long-axis planes passing through the middle of MVA or TVA. A novel algorithm was used to obtain dynamic three-dimensional (3D) reconstruction of MVA and TVA. Analysis was feasible in all cases, allowing accurate 3D annular reconstruction and tracking. The 3D area increased from systole [MVA, median = 10.0 cm(2) (first quartile = 8.6, third quartile = 11.4); TVA, 11.2 cm(2) (8.8-13.2)] to diastole [MVA, 10.6 cm(2) (9.4, 11.7); TVA, 11.9 cm(2) (9.2-13.5)], with TVA larger than MVA. While the longest diameter showed similar systolic and diastolic values, the shortest diameter elongated from systole [MVA, 30 mm (29-33); TVA, 33 mm (31-36)] to diastole [MVA, 31 mm (29-32); TVA, 36 mm (33-39)]. Also, TVA became more circular than MVA. TVA showed lower peak systolic excursion in the septal [15.9 mm (13.0-18.5)] and anterior regions [17.9 mm (12.2-20.7)] compared with the posterior [21.9 mm (18.6-24.0)] segment. Values in MVA were smaller than in TVA, slightly higher in anterior [11.2 mm (9.5-13.0)] than in posterior [12.4 mm (10.2-14.6)] segments. Valvular regurgitation was associated with enlarged, flattened, and more circular annuli. CONCLUSION: The applied method was feasible and accurate in normal and regurgitant valves, and may potentially have an impact on diagnosis, improvement of surgical techniques and design of annular prostheses.
Authors: Francesco Sturla; Francesco Onorati; Giovanni Puppini; Omar A Pappalardo; Matteo Selmi; Emiliano Votta; Giuseppe Faggian; Alberto Redaelli Journal: J Thorac Dis Date: 2017-04 Impact factor: 2.895
Authors: Giselle Revah; Vincent Wu; Peter R Huntjens; Eve Piekarski; Janice Y Chyou; Leon Axel Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2016-06-15 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Marco M Ochs; Thomas Fritz; Florian André; Johannes Riffel; Derliz Mereles; Matthias Müller-Hennessen; Evangelos Giannitsis; Hugo A Katus; Matthias G Friedrich; Sebastian J Buss Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2017-01-21 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Khurram Owais; Charles E Taylor; Luyang Jiang; Kamal R Khabbaz; Mario Montealegre-Gallegos; Robina Matyal; Joseph H Gorman; Robert C Gorman; Feroze Mahmood Journal: Ann Thorac Surg Date: 2014-09-22 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: Sonja Gordic; Thi Dan Linh Nguyen-Kim; Robert Manka; Simon Sündermann; Thomas Frauenfelder; Francesco Maisano; Volkmar Falk; Hatem Alkadhi Journal: Int J Cardiovasc Imaging Date: 2013-12-04 Impact factor: 2.357
Authors: Devin W Laurence; Emily L Johnson; Ming-Chen Hsu; Ryan Baumwart; Arshid Mir; Harold M Burkhart; Gerhard A Holzapfel; Yi Wu; Chung-Hao Lee Journal: Int J Numer Method Biomed Eng Date: 2020-05-08 Impact factor: 2.747
Authors: Sohum Kapadia; Amar Krishnaswamy; Habib Layoun; Brian P Griffin; Per Wierup; Paul Schoenhagen; Serge C Harb Journal: Cardiovasc Diagn Ther Date: 2021-02
Authors: Shuang Leng; Jiajun Guo; Ru-San Tan; Ping Chai; Lynette Teo; Marielle V Fortier; Chao Gong; Xiaodan Zhao; Ching Ching Ong; John C Allen; Wen Ruan; Angela S Koh; Teng Hong Tan; James W Yip; Ju Le Tan; Yucheng Chen; Liang Zhong Journal: Front Cardiovasc Med Date: 2021-06-04