Literature DB >> 23340947

Direct healthcare costs for 5 years post-fracture in Canada: a long-term population-based assessment.

W D Leslie1, L M Lix, G S Finlayson, C J Metge, S N Morin, S R Majumdar.   

Abstract

UNLABELLED: High direct incremental healthcare costs post-fracture are seen in the first year, but total costs from a third-party healthcare payer perspective eventually fall below pre-fracture levels. We attribute this to higher mortality among fracture cases who are already the heaviest users of healthcare ("healthy survivor bias"). Economic analyses that do not account for the possibility of a long-term reduction in direct healthcare costs in the post-fracture population may systematically overestimate the total economic burden of fracture.
INTRODUCTION: High healthcare costs in the first 1-2 years after an osteoporotic fracture are well recognized, but long-term costs are uncertain. We evaluated incremental costs of non-traumatic fractures up to 5 years from a third-party healthcare payer perspective.
METHODS: A total of 16,198 incident fracture cases and 48,594 matched non-fracture controls were identified in the province of Manitoba, Canada (1997-2002). We calculated the difference in median direct healthcare costs for the year pre-fracture and 5 years post-fracture expressed in 2009 Canadian dollars with adjustment for expected age-related healthcare cost increases.
RESULTS: Incremental median costs for a hip fracture were highest in the first year ($25,306 in women, $21,396 in men), remaining above pre-fracture baseline to 5 years in women but falling below pre-fracture costs by 5 years in men. In those who survived 5 years following a hip fracture, incremental costs remained above pre-fracture costs at 5 years ($12,670 in women, $7,933 in men). Incremental costs were consistently increased for 5 years after spine fracture in women. Total incremental healthcare costs for all incident fractures combined showed a large increase over pre-fracture costs in the first year ($137 million in women, $57 million in men), but fell below pre-fracture costs within 3-4 years. Elevated total healthcare costs were seen at year 5 in women after wrist, humerus and spine fractures, but these were somewhat offset by decreases in total healthcare costs for other fractures.
CONCLUSIONS: High direct healthcare costs post-fracture are seen in the first year, but total costs eventually fall below pre-fracture levels. Among those who survive 5 years following a fracture, healthcare costs remain above pre-fracture levels.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23340947     DOI: 10.1007/s00198-012-2232-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Osteoporos Int        ISSN: 0937-941X            Impact factor:   4.507


  33 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness analysis: can we reduce variability in costing methods?

Authors:  Taghreed Adam; Marc A Koopmanschap; David B Evans
Journal:  Int J Technol Assess Health Care       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 2.188

2.  Institutionalization following incident non-traumatic fractures in community-dwelling men and women.

Authors:  S Morin; L M Lix; M Azimaee; C Metge; S R Majumdar; W D Leslie
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2011-10-19       Impact factor: 4.507

3.  Incorporating adherence into health economic modelling of osteoporosis.

Authors:  O Ström; F Borgström; J A Kanis; B Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2008-06-03       Impact factor: 4.507

4.  The influence of osteoporotic fractures on health-related quality of life in community-dwelling men and women across Canada.

Authors:  J D Adachi; G Loannidis; C Berger; L Joseph; A Papaioannou; L Pickard; E A Papadimitropoulos; W Hopman; S Poliquin; J C Prior; D A Hanley; W P Olszynski; T Anastassiades; J P Brown; T Murray; S A Jackson; A Tenenhouse
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2001       Impact factor: 4.507

5.  Closing the gap in postfracture care at the population level: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Lisa LaBine; Penny Klassen; Darlene Dreilich; Patricia A Caetano
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2011-12-19       Impact factor: 8.262

6.  Costs and quality of life associated with osteoporosis-related fractures in Sweden.

Authors:  Fredrik Borgström; Niklas Zethraeus; Olof Johnell; Lars Lidgren; Sari Ponzer; Olle Svensson; Peter Abdon; Ewald Ornstein; Karl Lunsjö; Karl Göran Thorngren; Ingemar Sernbo; Clas Rehnberg; Bengt Jönsson
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-11-09       Impact factor: 4.507

7.  Direct costs of fractures in Canada and trends 1996-2006: a population-based cost-of-illness analysis.

Authors:  William D Leslie; Colleen J Metge; Mahmoud Azimaee; Lisa M Lix; Gregory S Finlayson; Suzanne N Morin; Patricia Caetano
Journal:  J Bone Miner Res       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 6.741

8.  Fragility fracture-related direct medical costs in the first year following a nonvertebral fracture in a managed care setting.

Authors:  Robert L Ohsfeldt; Natalie N Borisov; Richard L Sheer
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2005-09-29       Impact factor: 4.507

9.  Economic burden of privately insured non-vertebral fracture patients with osteoporosis over a 2-year period in the US.

Authors:  C Pike; H G Birnbaum; M Schiller; E Swallow; R T Burge; E T Edgell
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.507

10.  FRAX and its applications in health economics--cost-effectiveness and intervention thresholds using bazedoxifene in a Swedish setting as an example.

Authors:  O Ström; F Borgström; M Kleman; E McCloskey; A Odén; H Johansson; J A Kanis
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 4.398

View more
  11 in total

1.  Cost-effectiveness of a fracture liaison service--a real-world evaluation after 6 years of service provision.

Authors:  J H E Yong; L Masucci; J S Hoch; R Sujic; D Beaton
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-08-15       Impact factor: 4.507

2.  Aging and direct medical costs of osteoporotic fractures.

Authors:  Eu Gene Kim; Green Bae; Hye-Young Kwon; Hyowon Yang
Journal:  J Bone Miner Metab       Date:  2021-01-08       Impact factor: 2.626

3.  The burden of osteoporotic hip fractures in Portugal: costs, health related quality of life and mortality.

Authors:  A Marques; Ó Lourenço; J A P da Silva
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2015-05-19       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  The Effect of Kinesitherapy on Bone Mineral Density in Primary Osteoporosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Shanxi Wang; Shuzhen Li; Xing Xie; Juying Xie
Journal:  Evid Based Complement Alternat Med       Date:  2020-08-05       Impact factor: 2.629

Review 5.  Quality of life assessment in musculo-skeletal health.

Authors:  Charlotte Beaudart; Emmanuel Biver; Olivier Bruyère; Cyrus Cooper; Nasser Al-Daghri; Jean-Yves Reginster; René Rizzoli
Journal:  Aging Clin Exp Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  Healthcare Costs of Osteoporotic Fracture in Korea: Information from the National Health Insurance Claims Database, 2008-2011.

Authors:  Ha Young Kim; Yong-Chan Ha; Tae-Young Kim; Hyemin Cho; Young-Kyun Lee; Ji-Yeon Baek; Sunmee Jang
Journal:  J Bone Metab       Date:  2017-05-31

7.  Medical costs of osteoporosis in the Iranian elderly patients.

Authors:  Vahid Alipour; Zahra Meshkani; Aziz Rezapour; Ali Aboutorabi; Rafat Bagherzadeh; Naser Saber
Journal:  Med J Islam Repub Iran       Date:  2020-04-22

8.  Multiple sclerosis is associated with low bone mineral density and osteoporosis.

Authors:  Etienne J Bisson; Marcia L Finlayson; Okechukwu Ekuma; William D Leslie; Ruth Ann Marrie
Journal:  Neurol Clin Pract       Date:  2019-10

9.  What Is the Difference in the Risk of Suicide Death Between Spine Fracture in Patients Older Than 65 Years and Matched Controls? A Large-database Study from South Korea.

Authors:  Suk-Yong Jang; Yonghan Cha; Joon-Hyeok Kwak; Kap-Jung Kim; Ha-Yong Kim; Won-Sik Choy
Journal:  Clin Orthop Relat Res       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 4.755

10.  The value of radiography in the follow-up of extremity fractures: a systematic review.

Authors:  P van Gerven; S M Rubinstein; C Nederpelt; M F Termaat; P Krijnen; M W van Tulder; I B Schipper
Journal:  Arch Orthop Trauma Surg       Date:  2018-08-14       Impact factor: 3.067

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.