Literature DB >> 23340071

Participation in the chronic phase of stroke.

Carlijn H van der Zee1, Johanna M A Visser-Meily, Eline Lindeman, L Jaap Kappelle, Marcel W M Post.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Participation is a multidimensional concept, consisting of an objective and a subjective dimension. Many studies have focused on determinants of only 1 dimension of participation post stroke.
OBJECTIVE: To describe participation (both objective and subjective) and to determine how physical and cognitive independence and subjective complaints (pain, fatigue, and mood) influence participation in community-dwelling stroke survivors in the Netherlands.
METHODS: The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation (USER) measures physical and cognitive independence and subjective complaints. USER-Participation measures 3 dimensions of participation: frequency (objective perspective), restrictions (subjective perspective), and satisfaction (subjective perspective). Spearman correlations and backward linear regression analyses were used to analyze associations between the 3 USER-Participation scores with demographics, stroke characteristics, physical and cognitive independence, and subjective complaints.
RESULTS: Of the 111 participants, 48.5% returned to work post stroke, but mostly for only 1 to 16 hours a week. Experienced participation restrictions were most prevalent in physical exercise, chores in/around the house, housekeeping, and outdoor activities. On average, participants were relatively satisfied with their participation, but dissatisfaction occurred in cognition, activities outdoors, and work/housekeeping. Regression analysis revealed that objective participation was determined by physical and cognitive independence, age, and education, whereas subjective participation was determined by physical and cognitive independence, fatigue, and mood.
CONCLUSIONS: Most participants experienced participation problems, despite relatively good physical recovery. In addition to physical and cognitive factors, subjective complaints of persons with stroke should be addressed in the rehabilitation program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23340071     DOI: 10.1310/tsr2001-52

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil        ISSN: 1074-9357            Impact factor:   2.119


  18 in total

1.  Self-efficacy Mediates the Relationship between Balance/Walking Performance, Activity, and Participation after Stroke.

Authors:  Margaret A French; Meghan F Moore; Ryan Pohlig; Darcy Reisman
Journal:  Top Stroke Rehabil       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 2.119

2.  Physical Activity Level of Ambulatory Stroke Patients: Is it Related to Neuropsychological Factors?

Authors:  Burcu Ersöz Hüseyinsinoğlu; Gökşen Kuran Aslan; Devrim Tarakci; Arzu Razak Özdinçler; Hayriye Küçükoğlu; Sevim Baybaş
Journal:  Noro Psikiyatr Ars       Date:  2016-03-28       Impact factor: 1.339

3.  Combined Cognitive-Strategy and Task-Specific Training Improve Transfer to Untrained Activities in Subacute Stroke: An Exploratory Randomized Controlled Trial.

Authors:  Sara McEwen; Helene Polatajko; Carolyn Baum; Jorge Rios; Dianne Cirone; Meghan Doherty; Timothy Wolf
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2014-11-21       Impact factor: 3.919

4.  Effects of a social participation-focused virtual reality intervention for community-dwelling stroke survivors with physical disabilities: a randomised controlled trial protocol.

Authors:  Janita Pak Chun Chau; Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo; Alexander Yuk Lun Lau; Vivian Wing Yan Lee; Kai Chow Choi; Eddie Chi Fai Kwok; David R Thompson
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2022-07-05       Impact factor: 3.006

5.  A conceptual disease model for quality of life in mitochondrial disease.

Authors:  Kim F E van de Loo; Nander T van Zeijl; Mirian C H Janssen; Christianne M Verhaak; José A E Custers
Journal:  Orphanet J Rare Dis       Date:  2022-07-15       Impact factor: 4.303

Review 6.  Ischaemic stroke in young adults: risk factors and long-term consequences.

Authors:  Noortje A M M Maaijwee; Loes C A Rutten-Jacobs; Pauline Schaapsmeerders; Ewoud J van Dijk; Frank-Erik de Leeuw
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurol       Date:  2014-04-29       Impact factor: 42.937

7.  Stroke Impact Scale 3.0: Reliability and Validity Evaluation of the Korean Version.

Authors:  Seong Uk Choi; Hye Sun Lee; Joon Ho Shin; Seung Hee Ho; Mi Jung Koo; Kyoung Hae Park; Jeong Ah Yoon; Dong Min Kim; Jung Eun Oh; Se Hwa Yu; Dong A Kim
Journal:  Ann Rehabil Med       Date:  2017-06-29

8.  Course of Social Participation in the First 2 Years After Stroke and Its Associations With Demographic and Stroke-Related Factors.

Authors:  Daan P J Verberne; Marcel W M Post; Sebastian Köhler; Leeanne M Carey; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Caroline M van Heugten
Journal:  Neurorehabil Neural Repair       Date:  2018-09-04       Impact factor: 3.919

9.  Virtual reality gait training versus non-virtual reality gait training for improving participation in subacute stroke survivors: study protocol of the ViRTAS randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Ilona J M de Rooij; Ingrid G L van de Port; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Jan-Willem G Meijer
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2019-01-29       Impact factor: 2.279

Review 10.  What environmental factors influence resumption of valued activities post stroke: a systematic review of qualitative and quantitative findings.

Authors:  Sandra Jellema; Suzanne van Hees; Jana Zajec; Rob van der Sande; Maria Wg Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Esther Mj Steultjens
Journal:  Clin Rehabil       Date:  2016-09-28       Impact factor: 3.477

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.