BACKGROUND: Participation is a multidimensional concept, consisting of an objective and a subjective dimension. Many studies have focused on determinants of only 1 dimension of participation post stroke. OBJECTIVE: To describe participation (both objective and subjective) and to determine how physical and cognitive independence and subjective complaints (pain, fatigue, and mood) influence participation in community-dwelling stroke survivors in the Netherlands. METHODS: The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation (USER) measures physical and cognitive independence and subjective complaints. USER-Participation measures 3 dimensions of participation: frequency (objective perspective), restrictions (subjective perspective), and satisfaction (subjective perspective). Spearman correlations and backward linear regression analyses were used to analyze associations between the 3 USER-Participation scores with demographics, stroke characteristics, physical and cognitive independence, and subjective complaints. RESULTS: Of the 111 participants, 48.5% returned to work post stroke, but mostly for only 1 to 16 hours a week. Experienced participation restrictions were most prevalent in physical exercise, chores in/around the house, housekeeping, and outdoor activities. On average, participants were relatively satisfied with their participation, but dissatisfaction occurred in cognition, activities outdoors, and work/housekeeping. Regression analysis revealed that objective participation was determined by physical and cognitive independence, age, and education, whereas subjective participation was determined by physical and cognitive independence, fatigue, and mood. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants experienced participation problems, despite relatively good physical recovery. In addition to physical and cognitive factors, subjective complaints of persons with stroke should be addressed in the rehabilitation program.
BACKGROUND: Participation is a multidimensional concept, consisting of an objective and a subjective dimension. Many studies have focused on determinants of only 1 dimension of participation post stroke. OBJECTIVE: To describe participation (both objective and subjective) and to determine how physical and cognitive independence and subjective complaints (pain, fatigue, and mood) influence participation in community-dwelling stroke survivors in the Netherlands. METHODS: The Utrecht Scale for Evaluation of Rehabilitation (USER) measures physical and cognitive independence and subjective complaints. USER-Participation measures 3 dimensions of participation: frequency (objective perspective), restrictions (subjective perspective), and satisfaction (subjective perspective). Spearman correlations and backward linear regression analyses were used to analyze associations between the 3 USER-Participation scores with demographics, stroke characteristics, physical and cognitive independence, and subjective complaints. RESULTS: Of the 111 participants, 48.5% returned to work post stroke, but mostly for only 1 to 16 hours a week. Experienced participation restrictions were most prevalent in physical exercise, chores in/around the house, housekeeping, and outdoor activities. On average, participants were relatively satisfied with their participation, but dissatisfaction occurred in cognition, activities outdoors, and work/housekeeping. Regression analysis revealed that objective participation was determined by physical and cognitive independence, age, and education, whereas subjective participation was determined by physical and cognitive independence, fatigue, and mood. CONCLUSIONS: Most participants experienced participation problems, despite relatively good physical recovery. In addition to physical and cognitive factors, subjective complaints of persons with stroke should be addressed in the rehabilitation program.
Authors: Janita Pak Chun Chau; Suzanne Hoi Shan Lo; Alexander Yuk Lun Lau; Vivian Wing Yan Lee; Kai Chow Choi; Eddie Chi Fai Kwok; David R Thompson Journal: BMJ Open Date: 2022-07-05 Impact factor: 3.006
Authors: Kim F E van de Loo; Nander T van Zeijl; Mirian C H Janssen; Christianne M Verhaak; José A E Custers Journal: Orphanet J Rare Dis Date: 2022-07-15 Impact factor: 4.303
Authors: Noortje A M M Maaijwee; Loes C A Rutten-Jacobs; Pauline Schaapsmeerders; Ewoud J van Dijk; Frank-Erik de Leeuw Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2014-04-29 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Seong Uk Choi; Hye Sun Lee; Joon Ho Shin; Seung Hee Ho; Mi Jung Koo; Kyoung Hae Park; Jeong Ah Yoon; Dong Min Kim; Jung Eun Oh; Se Hwa Yu; Dong A Kim Journal: Ann Rehabil Med Date: 2017-06-29
Authors: Daan P J Verberne; Marcel W M Post; Sebastian Köhler; Leeanne M Carey; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Caroline M van Heugten Journal: Neurorehabil Neural Repair Date: 2018-09-04 Impact factor: 3.919
Authors: Ilona J M de Rooij; Ingrid G L van de Port; Johanna M A Visser-Meily; Jan-Willem G Meijer Journal: Trials Date: 2019-01-29 Impact factor: 2.279
Authors: Sandra Jellema; Suzanne van Hees; Jana Zajec; Rob van der Sande; Maria Wg Nijhuis-van der Sanden; Esther Mj Steultjens Journal: Clin Rehabil Date: 2016-09-28 Impact factor: 3.477