Literature DB >> 23340056

The sperm protamine mRNA ratio as a clinical parameter to estimate the fertilizing potential of men taking part in an ART programme.

Nina Rogenhofer1, Temuujin Dansranjavin, Martin Schorsch, Andrej Spiess, Hongxiang Wang, Viktoria von Schönfeldt, Heike Cappallo-Obermann, Vera Baukloh, Hao Yang, Agnieszka Paradowska, Bin Chen, Christian J Thaler, Wolfgang Weidner, Hans-Christian Schuppe, Klaus Steger.   

Abstract

STUDY QUESTION: Could the protamine-1 to protamine-2 mRNA ratio serve as a biomarker to estimate the fertilizing capacity of sperm from men taking part in an IVF/ICSI programme? SUMMARY ANSWER: The protamine mRNA ratio clearly discriminates between fertile and subfertile men and sperm with a normal protamine mRNA ratio exhibit a higher fertilizing capacity in IVF/ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: Aberrant sperm protamine ratios are associated with male factor infertility and mRNA ratio is comparable with protein ratio (due to transcriptional stop in elongating spermatids). STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: The study population was drawn from subfertile men, whose female partners participated in IVF or ICSI programmes between September 2010 and February 2012. Normozoospermic healthy volunteers served as controls. Sperm cells were lysed, mRNA extracted, reverse transcribed and subjected to real-time quantitative PCR using specific primer pairs for protamine-1 and protamine-2. Relative protamine-1 and protamine-2 mRNA levels were analysed with the Mann-Whitney U-test (two-tailed). PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING,
METHODS: Quantitative RT-PCR for protamines 1 and 2 has been performed in ejaculates from 32 normozoospermic volunteers (control, University Clinic Giessen, Germany) and 306 patients, whose female partners took part in an IVF (n = 76; University Clinic Hamburg, Germany and Shanghai Jiaotong University, China) or an ICSI (n = 230; University Clinic Munich, Germany and Kinderwunschzentrum Wiesbaden, Germany) programme. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: The sperm protamine mRNA ratio in normozoospermic men (0.98 ± 0.3) differed significantly from that of ICSI patients (Munich 0.81 ± 0.1; Wiesbaden 0.78 ± 0.2; P < 0.001), while processed samples obtained from IVF patients revealed a normal protamine mRNA ratio (Hamburg 1.0 ± 0.07; Shanghai 1.0 ± 0.54). Normal protamine mRNA ratios were associated with a significantly higher total motile sperm count and a significantly higher percentage of progressively motile sperm. Sperm with a normal protamine mRNA ratio revealed a higher fertilization capacity (fc) in both IVF (53.6% of patients with fc > 80%; P = 0.017) and ICSI (65.1% of patients with fc > 70%; P = 0.028). LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: The protamine mRNA ratio in an individual sperm cell used for ICSI may be different from the overall value obtained from a semen aliquot. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE
FINDINGS: Data are in line with current literature and suggest the protamine mRNA ratio as a diagnostic marker to estimate the fertilizing capacity of sperm. STUDY FUNDING: The German Research Foundation (DFG) to K.S., W.W. and A.P. (STE 892/9-2), as well as to A.S. and H.C.O. (SP721/1-3). COMPETING INTEREST(S): None.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23340056     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/des471

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  11 in total

1.  Expression of sperm-specific protamines impairs bacterial and eukaryotic cell proliferation.

Authors:  Katharina Günther; Agnieszka Paradowska-Dogan; Birte Bärmann; Harald Klein; Christoph von Eichel-Streiber; Ricardo Hartley; Wolfgang Weidner; Rüdiger Behr; Klaus Steger
Journal:  Histochem Cell Biol       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 4.304

Review 2.  Developmental origins of male subfertility: role of infection, inflammation, and environmental factors.

Authors:  Undraga Schagdarsurengin; Patrick Western; Klaus Steger; Andreas Meinhardt
Journal:  Semin Immunopathol       Date:  2016-06-17       Impact factor: 9.623

Review 3.  The presence, role and clinical use of spermatozoal RNAs.

Authors:  Meritxell Jodar; Sellappan Selvaraju; Edward Sendler; Michael P Diamond; Stephen A Krawetz
Journal:  Hum Reprod Update       Date:  2013-07-14       Impact factor: 15.610

Review 4.  Epigenetics in male reproduction: effect of paternal diet on sperm quality and offspring health.

Authors:  Undraga Schagdarsurengin; Klaus Steger
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2016-08-31       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 5.  Genetics of Male Infertility.

Authors:  Filipe Tenorio Lira Neto; Phil Vu Bach; Bobby Baback Najari; Philip Shihua Li; Marc Goldstein
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2016-10       Impact factor: 3.092

6.  Re-visiting the Protamine-2 locus: deletion, but not haploinsufficiency, renders male mice infertile.

Authors:  Simon Schneider; Melanie Balbach; Daniela Fietz; Daniel Nettersheim; Sina Jostes; Rovenna Schmidt; Monika Kressin; Martin Bergmann; Dagmar Wachten; Klaus Steger; Hubert Schorle
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-11-11       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Protamine-2 Deficiency Initiates a Reactive Oxygen Species (ROS)-Mediated Destruction Cascade during Epididymal Sperm Maturation in Mice.

Authors:  Simon Schneider; Farhad Shakeri; Christian Trötschel; Lena Arévalo; Alexander Kruse; Andreas Buness; Ansgar Poetsch; Klaus Steger; Hubert Schorle
Journal:  Cells       Date:  2020-07-27       Impact factor: 6.600

Review 8.  The male contribution to recurrent pregnancy loss.

Authors:  Yetunde Ibrahim; Erica Johnstone
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-07

9.  In Silico Sperm Proteome Analysis to Investigate DNA Repair Mechanisms in Varicocele Patients.

Authors:  Renata Finelli; Sara Darbandi; Peter Natesan Pushparaj; Ralf Henkel; Edmund Ko; Ashok Agarwal
Journal:  Front Endocrinol (Lausanne)       Date:  2021-12-17       Impact factor: 5.555

10.  Decreased Sperm Motility Retarded ICSI Fertilization Rate in Severe Oligozoospermia but Good-Quality Embryo Transfer Had Achieved the Prospective Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Jufeng Zheng; Yongning Lu; Xianqin Qu; Peng Wang; Luiwen Zhao; Minzhi Gao; Huijuan Shi; Xingliang Jin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.