Literature DB >> 23339941

[Comparison of individual differences in the direct microscopic examination in the diagnosis of intestinal parasites].

Nihal Doğan1, Yasemin Oz, Nazmiye Ulkü Koçman, Ayşe Feyda Nursal.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The aim is to emphasise the importance for intestinal parasites' diagnosis by direct microscopic examination and the discrepancies among results from different microscopists.
METHODS: Stool specimens were obtained from 225 children with diarrhoea after the macroscopic examination, prepared by formalineether sedimentation methods and included in microscopically examination by three different independent investigators (parasitologist, microbiologist, research assistant). Furthermore, specimens were stained with the modified Ehrlich Ziehl Neelsen method and evaluated for Cryptosporidium and Cyclospora.
RESULTS: A total 161 specimens were evaluated as negative by all investigators. The number of specimens containing parasites detected by at least one investigator was 64; Cryptosporidium parvum 30, Blastocytis hominis 16, Endolimax nana 5, Giardia intestinalis 4, Dientamoeba fragilis 3, Ascaris lumbricoides 3, Entamoeba histolytica/dispar 2, Cyclospora cayetanensis 1. The concordance among investigators was observed for 21 (33%) specimens; when specimens were evaluated for the presence of leukocytes and/or parasites, concordance was detected for 58 (91%) of the 64 specimens. In particular, significant differences were observed for the species level identification.
CONCLUSION: Different results can be obtained by microscopic examination according to the experience and educational level of microscopists. Therefore, we think that these tests should be performed by persons who have sufficient education and experience, if possible, combined with at least two different methods.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2012        PMID: 23339941     DOI: 10.5152/tpd.2012.51

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Turkiye Parazitol Derg        ISSN: 1300-6320


  4 in total

Review 1.  Dientamoeba fragilis, the Neglected Trichomonad of the Human Bowel.

Authors:  Damien Stark; Joel Barratt; Douglas Chan; John T Ellis
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 26.132

2.  Comparison of Various Methods in the Diagnosis of Entamoeba histolytica in Stool and Serum Specimens.

Authors:  Hakan Uslu; Osman Aktas; Muhammet Hamidullah Uyanik
Journal:  Eurasian J Med       Date:  2016-06

3.  Investigation of neglected protists Blastocystis sp. and Dientamoeba fragilis in immunocompetent and immunodeficient diarrheal patients using both conventional and molecular methods.

Authors:  Fakhriddin Sarzhanov; Funda Dogruman-Al; Monica Santin; Jenny G Maloney; Ayse Semra Gureser; Djursun Karasartova; Aysegul Taylan-Ozkan
Journal:  PLoS Negl Trop Dis       Date:  2021-10-06

Review 4.  Prevalence and risk factors of parasitic diseases among Saudi children: An updated review.

Authors:  Jamila S Al-Malki
Journal:  Saudi Med J       Date:  2021-06       Impact factor: 1.422

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.