Literature DB >> 23339633

Toxicity of CuO nanoparticles to yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 wild-type and its nine isogenic single-gene deletion mutants.

Kaja Kasemets1, Sandra Suppi, Kai Künnis-Beres, Anne Kahru.   

Abstract

A suite of eight tentatively oxidative stress response-deficient Saccharomyces cerevisiae BY4741 single-gene mutants (sod1Δ, sod2Δ, yap1Δ, cta1Δ, ctt1Δ, gsh1Δ, glr1Δ, and ccs1Δ) and one copper-vulnerable mutant (cup2Δ) was used to elucidate weather the toxicity of CuO nanoparticles to S. cerevisiae is mediated by oxidative stress (OS). Specifically, sensitivity profiles of mutants' phenotypes and wild-type (wt) upon exposure to nano-CuO were compared. As controls, CuSO4 (solubility), bulk-CuO (size), H2O2, and menadione (OS) were used. Growth inhibition of wt and mutant strains was studied in rich YPD medium and cell viability in deionized water (DI). Dissolved Cu-ions were quantified by recombinant metal-sensing bacteria and chemical analysis. To wt strain nano-CuO was 32-fold more toxic than bulk-CuO: 24-h IC50 4.8 and 155 mg/L in DI and 643 and >20000 mg/L in YPD, respectively. In toxicant-free YPD medium, all mutants had practically similar growth patterns as wt. However, the mutant strains sod1Δ, sod2Δ, ccs1Δ, and yap1Δ showed up to 12-fold elevated sensitivity toward OS standard chemicals menadione and H2O2 but not to nano-CuO, indicating that CuO nanoparticles exerted toxicity to yeast cells via different mechanisms. The most vulnerable strain to all studied Cu compounds was the copper stress response-deficient strain cup2Δ (∼16-fold difference with wt), indicating that the toxic effect of CuO (nano)particles proceeds via dissolved Cu-ions. The dissolved copper solely explained the toxicity of nano-CuO in DI but not in YPD. Assumingly, in YPD nano-CuO acquired a coating of peptides/proteins and sorbed onto the yeast's outer surface, resulting in their increased solubility in the close vicinity of yeast cells and increased uptake of Cu-ions that was not registered by the assays used for the analysis of dissolved Cu-ions in the test medium. Lastly, as yeast retained its viability in DI even by 24th hour of incubation, the profiling of the acute basal toxicity of chemicals toward yeasts may be conducted in DI.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23339633     DOI: 10.1021/tx300467d

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chem Res Toxicol        ISSN: 0893-228X            Impact factor:   3.739


  14 in total

1.  Cu Nanoparticles Have Different Impacts in Escherichia coli and Lactobacillus brevis than Their Microsized and Ionic Analogues.

Authors:  Chitrada Kaweeteerawat; Chong Hyun Chang; Kevin R Roy; Rong Liu; Ruibin Li; Daniel Toso; Heidi Fischer; Angela Ivask; Zhaoxia Ji; Jeffrey I Zink; Z Hong Zhou; Guillaume Francois Chanfreau; Donatello Telesca; Yoram Cohen; Patricia Ann Holden; Andre E Nel; Hilary A Godwin
Journal:  ACS Nano       Date:  2015-07-13       Impact factor: 15.881

2.  Assessment of the toxicity of CuO nanoparticles by using Saccharomyces cerevisiae mutants with multiple genes deleted.

Authors:  Shaopan Bao; Qicong Lu; Tao Fang; Heping Dai; Chao Zhang
Journal:  Appl Environ Microbiol       Date:  2015-09-18       Impact factor: 4.792

3.  Copper Oxide Nanoparticles Impact Several Toxicological Endpoints and Cause Neurodegeneration in Caenorhabditis elegans.

Authors:  Michael J Mashock; Tyler Zanon; Anthony D Kappell; Lisa N Petrella; Erik C Andersen; Krassimira R Hristova
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-12-02       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  EU Regulation of Nanobiocides: Challenges in Implementing the Biocidal Product Regulation (BPR).

Authors:  Anna Brinch; Steffen Foss Hansen; Nanna B Hartmann; Anders Baun
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2016-02-16       Impact factor: 5.076

5.  Ecotoxicological Method with Marine Bacteria Vibrio anguillarum to Evaluate the Acute Toxicity of Environmental Contaminants.

Authors:  Alice Rotini; Loredana Manfra; Filippo Spanu; Marco Pisapia; Anna Maria Cicero; Luciana Migliore
Journal:  J Vis Exp       Date:  2017-05-26       Impact factor: 1.355

Review 6.  Toxicity of Ag, CuO and ZnO nanoparticles to selected environmentally relevant test organisms and mammalian cells in vitro: a critical review.

Authors:  Olesja Bondarenko; Katre Juganson; Angela Ivask; Kaja Kasemets; Monika Mortimer; Anne Kahru
Journal:  Arch Toxicol       Date:  2013-06-01       Impact factor: 5.153

7.  The neglected nano-specific toxicity of ZnO nanoparticles in the yeast Saccharomyces cerevisiae.

Authors:  Weicheng Zhang; Shaopan Bao; Tao Fang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2016-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Salinity-Based Toxicity of CuO Nanoparticles, CuO-Bulk and Cu Ion to Vibrio anguillarum.

Authors:  Alice Rotini; Andrea Tornambè; Riccardo Cossi; Franco Iamunno; Giovanna Benvenuto; Maria T Berducci; Chiara Maggi; Maria C Thaller; Anna M Cicero; Loredana Manfra; Luciana Migliore
Journal:  Front Microbiol       Date:  2017-10-25       Impact factor: 5.640

Review 9.  Toxicity Effects of Functionalized Quantum Dots, Gold and Polystyrene Nanoparticles on Target Aquatic Biological Models: A Review.

Authors:  Giovanni Libralato; Emilia Galdiero; Annarita Falanga; Rosa Carotenuto; Elisabetta de Alteriis; Marco Guida
Journal:  Molecules       Date:  2017-08-31       Impact factor: 4.411

10.  Label-free and dynamic monitoring of cytotoxicity to the blood-brain barrier cells treated with nanometre copper oxide.

Authors:  Duan Lian; Zhang Chonghua; Gu Wen; Zhang Hongwei; Bai Xuetao
Journal:  IET Nanobiotechnol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.847

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.