Literature DB >> 23338964

Improving confidence in observational studies : should statistical analysis plans be made publicly available?

Eberechukwu Onukwugha.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23338964     DOI: 10.1007/s40273-012-0019-0

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


× No keyword cloud information.
  18 in total

1.  Registration of observational studies does not enhance validity.

Authors:  D A Savitz
Journal:  Clin Pharmacol Ther       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 6.875

2.  Preregistration of study protocols is unlikely to improve the yield from our science, but other strategies might.

Authors:  Timothy L Lash
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.822

3.  The registration of observational studies--when metaphors go bad.

Authors: 
Journal:  Epidemiology       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 4.822

4.  Registration of observational studies: is it time?

Authors:  Rebecca J Williams; Tony Tse; William R Harlan; Deborah A Zarin
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 8.262

5.  Should protocols for observational research be registered?

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2010-01-30       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  GRACE principles: recognizing high-quality observational studies of comparative effectiveness.

Authors:  Nancy A Dreyer; Sebastian Schneeweiss; Barbara J McNeil; Marc L Berger; Alec M Walker; Daniel A Ollendorf; Richard E Gliklich
Journal:  Am J Manag Care       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 2.229

7.  Registration of protocols for observational research is unnecessary and would do more harm than good.

Authors:  Neil Pearce
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2010-11-29       Impact factor: 4.402

8.  The AMCP format for formulary submissions version 3.0.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Manag Care Pharm       Date:  2010-01

9.  The value of statistical analysis plans in observational research: defining high-quality research from the start.

Authors:  Laine Thomas; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  2012-08-22       Impact factor: 56.272

10.  The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration.

Authors:  Alessandro Liberati; Douglas G Altman; Jennifer Tetzlaff; Cynthia Mulrow; Peter C Gøtzsche; John P A Ioannidis; Mike Clarke; P J Devereaux; Jos Kleijnen; David Moher
Journal:  PLoS Med       Date:  2009-07-21       Impact factor: 11.069

View more
  2 in total

1.  The efficacy of activated protein C for the treatment of sepsis: incorporating observational evidence with a Bayesian approach.

Authors:  Zhongheng Zhang
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2015-01-16       Impact factor: 2.692

2.  DEBATE-statistical analysis plans for observational studies.

Authors:  Bart Hiemstra; Frederik Keus; Jørn Wetterslev; Christian Gluud; Iwan C C van der Horst
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 4.615

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.