OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with a repeat expansion mutation in the gene C9orf72, and to determine whether there are differences in the clinical presentation compared with FTLD carriers of a mutation in GRN or MAPT or with patients with FTLD without mutation. DESIGN: Patient series. SETTING: Dementia clinics in Flanders, Belgium. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-five genetically and phenotypically thoroughly characterized patients with FTLD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and demographic characteristics of 26 C9orf72 expansion carriers compared with patients with a GRN or MAPT mutation, as well as patients with familial and sporadic FTLD without mutation. RESULTS: C9orf72 expansion carriers developed FTLD at an early age (average, 55.3 years; range, 42-69 years), significantly earlier than in GRN mutation carriers or patients with FTLD without mutation. Mean survival (6.2 years; range, 1.5-17.0 years) was similar to other patient groups. Most developed behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (85%), with disinhibited behavior as the prominent feature. Concomitant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a strong distinguishing feature for C9orf72 -associated FTLD. However, in most patients (73%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis symptoms were absent. Compared with C9orf72 expansion carriers, nonfluent aphasia and limb apraxia were significantly more common in GRN mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS: C9orf72 -associated FTLD most often presents with early-onset behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia with disinhibition as the prominent feature, with or without amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Based on the observed genotype-phenotype correlations between the different FTLD syndromes and different genetic causes, we propose a decision tree to guide clinical genetic testing in patients clinically diagnosed as having FTLD.
OBJECTIVE: To characterize patients with frontotemporal lobar degeneration (FTLD) with a repeat expansion mutation in the gene C9orf72, and to determine whether there are differences in the clinical presentation compared with FTLD carriers of a mutation in GRN or MAPT or with patients with FTLD without mutation. DESIGN:Patient series. SETTING:Dementia clinics in Flanders, Belgium. PATIENTS: Two hundred seventy-five genetically and phenotypically thoroughly characterized patients with FTLD. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Clinical and demographic characteristics of 26 C9orf72 expansion carriers compared with patients with a GRN or MAPT mutation, as well as patients with familial and sporadic FTLD without mutation. RESULTS:C9orf72 expansion carriers developed FTLD at an early age (average, 55.3 years; range, 42-69 years), significantly earlier than in GRN mutation carriers or patients with FTLD without mutation. Mean survival (6.2 years; range, 1.5-17.0 years) was similar to other patient groups. Most developed behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia (85%), with disinhibited behavior as the prominent feature. Concomitant amyotrophic lateral sclerosis is a strong distinguishing feature for C9orf72 -associated FTLD. However, in most patients (73%), amyotrophic lateral sclerosis symptoms were absent. Compared with C9orf72 expansion carriers, nonfluent aphasia and limb apraxia were significantly more common in GRN mutation carriers. CONCLUSIONS:C9orf72 -associated FTLD most often presents with early-onset behavioral variant frontotemporal dementia with disinhibition as the prominent feature, with or without amyotrophic lateral sclerosis. Based on the observed genotype-phenotype correlations between the different FTLD syndromes and different genetic causes, we propose a decision tree to guide clinical genetic testing in patients clinically diagnosed as having FTLD.
Authors: Marka van Blitterswijk; Matthew C Baker; Mariely DeJesus-Hernandez; Roberta Ghidoni; Luisa Benussi; Elizabeth Finger; Ging-Yuek R Hsiung; Brendan J Kelley; Melissa E Murray; Nicola J Rutherford; Patricia E Brown; Thomas Ravenscroft; Bianca Mullen; Peter E A Ash; Kevin F Bieniek; Kimmo J Hatanpaa; Anna Karydas; Elisabeth McCarty Wood; Giovanni Coppola; Eileen H Bigio; Carol Lippa; Michael J Strong; Thomas G Beach; David S Knopman; Edward D Huey; Marsel Mesulam; Thomas Bird; Charles L White; Andrew Kertesz; Dan H Geschwind; Vivianna M Van Deerlin; Ronald C Petersen; Giuliano Binetti; Bruce L Miller; Leonard Petrucelli; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Kevin B Boylan; Neill R Graff-Radford; Ian R Mackenzie; Bradley F Boeve; Dennis W Dickson; Rosa Rademakers Journal: Neurology Date: 2013-09-11 Impact factor: 9.910
Authors: Rosa Capozzo; Celeste Sassi; Monia B Hammer; Simona Arcuti; Chiara Zecca; Maria R Barulli; Rosanna Tortelli; J Raphael Gibbs; Cynthia Crews; Davide Seripa; Francesco Carnicella; Claudia Dell'Aquila; Marco Rossi; Filippo Tamma; Francesco Valluzzi; Bruno Brancasi; Francesco Panza; Andrew B Singleton; Giancarlo Logroscino Journal: Alzheimers Dement Date: 2017-03-03 Impact factor: 21.566
Authors: Lars M Ittner; Glenda M Halliday; Jillian J Kril; Jürgen Götz; John R Hodges; Matthew C Kiernan Journal: Nat Rev Neurol Date: 2015-05-05 Impact factor: 42.937
Authors: Stacey Li Hi Shing; Mary Clare McKenna; We Fong Siah; Rangariroyashe H Chipika; Orla Hardiman; Peter Bede Journal: Brain Imaging Behav Date: 2021-01-05 Impact factor: 3.978
Authors: Leonel T Takada; Valeria S Bahia; Henrique C Guimarães; Thais V M M Costa; Thiago C Vale; Roberta D Rodriguez; Fabio H G Porto; João C B Machado; Rogério G Beato; Karolina G Cesar; Jerusa Smid; Camila F Nascimento; Lea T Grinberg; Sonia M D Brucki; Jessica R Maximino; Sarah T Camargos; Gerson Chadi; Paulo Caramelli; Ricardo Nitrini Journal: Alzheimer Dis Assoc Disord Date: 2016 Oct-Dec Impact factor: 2.703