| Literature DB >> 23338175 |
Toshiyuki Hatano1, Songji Zhao, Yan Zhao, Ken-Ichi Nishijima, Norihito Kuno, Hiroko Hanzawa, Takeshi Sakamoto, Nagara Tamaki, Yuji Kuge.
Abstract
Accurate imaging to identify hypoxic regions in tumors is key for radiotherapy planning. [F-18]‑fluoro-misonidazole ([F-18]-FMISO) is widely used for tumor hypoxia imaging and has the potential to optimize radiotherapy planning. However, the biological characteristics of intratumoral [F-18]-FMISO distribution have not yet been fully investigated. In hypoxic cells, the hypoxia-inducible factor-1 (HIF-1) target proteins that induce cellular proliferation and glucose metabolism, glucose transporter-1 (Glut-1) and hexokinase-II (HK-II), are upregulated. In this study, we determined the intratumoral distribution of [F-18]-FMISO by autoradiography (ARG) and compared it with pimonidazole uptake, expression of Glut-1, tumor proliferative activity (Ki-67 index) and glucose metabolism ([C-14]2-fluoro-2-deoxy-D-glucose uptake; [C-14]-FDG) in a glioma rat model. Five C6 glioma‑bearing rats were injected with [F-18]-FMISO and [C-14]-FDG. After 90 min, the rats were injected with pimonidazole and 60 min later, the rats were sacrificed and tumor tissues were sectioned into slices. The adjacent slices were used for ARG and immunohistochemical (IHC) analyses of pimonidazole, Glut-1 and Ki-67. [F-18]-FMISO ARG images were divided into regions of high [F-18]-FMISO uptake (FMISO+) and low [F-18]-FMISO uptake (FMISO-). Pimonidazole and Glut-1 expression levels, Ki-67 index and [C-14]-FDG distribution were evaluated in the regions of interest (ROIs) placed on FMISO+ and FMISO-. [F-18]-FMISO distribution was generally consistent with pimonidazole distribution. The percentage of positively stained areas (% positive) of Glut-1 in FMISO+ was significantly higher compared to FMISO- (24 ± 8% in FMISO+ and 9 ± 4% in FMISO-; P<0.05). There were no significant differences in Ki-67 index and [C-14]-FDG uptake between FMISO+ and FMISO- (for Ki-67, 10 ± 5% in FMISO+ and 12 ± 5% in FMISO-, P=ns; for [C-14]-FDG, 1.4 ± 0.3% ID/g/kg in FMISO+ and 1.3 ± 0.3% ID/g/kg in FMISO-, P = ns). Intratumoral [F-18]-FMISO distribution reflected tumor hypoxia and expression of the hypoxia‑related gene product Glut-1; it did not, however, reflect tumor proliferation or glucose metabolism. Our findings help elucidate the biological characteristics of intratumoral [F-18]-FMISO distribution that are relevant to radiotherapy planning.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23338175 PMCID: PMC3597456 DOI: 10.3892/ijo.2013.1781
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Oncol ISSN: 1019-6439 Impact factor: 5.650
Figure 1[F-18]-FMISO ARG image. ROIs were placed on [F-18]-FMISO ARG image to cover FMISO+ and FMISO−, except for large necrotic/apoptotic regions.
Figure 2[F-18]-FMISO distribution in comparison with pimonidazole distribution. Representative images of (a) [F-18]-FMISO ARG and (b) pimonidazole IHC staining. Red and blue arrows denote the area of origin in panels c and d. Typical IHC stainings of pimonidazole in (c) FMISO+ and (d) FMISO−. (e) Pimonidazole uptake assessed by semiquantitative analysis in FMISO+ and FMISO−. N, necrotic/apoptotic regions.
Figure 3Glut-1 expression in comparison with [F-18]-FMISO distribution. (a) Representative image of Glut-1 IHC staining. Red and blue arrows denote the area of origin in panels b and c. Typical IHC stainings of Glut-1 in (b) FMISO+ and (c) FMISO−. (d) Glut-1 expression assessed by semiquantitative analysis in FMISO+ and FMISO−. N, necrotic/apoptotic regions.
Figure 4Ki-67 expression in comparison with [F-18]-FMISO distribution. (a) Representative image of Ki-67 IHC staining. Red and blue arrows denote the area of origin in panels b and c. Typical IHC stainings of Ki-67 in (b) FMISO+ and (c) FMISO−. (d) Ki-67 expression assessed by semiquantitative analysis in FMISO+ and FMISO−. N, necrotic/apoptotic regions.
Figure 5[C-14]-FDG distribution in comparison with [F-18]-FMISO distribution. (a) Representative image of [C-14]-FDG ARG. (b) [C-14]-FDG uptake assessed by semiquantitative analysis in FMISO+ and FMISO−. N, necrotic/apoptotic regions.
Figure 6HK-II expression in comparison with pimonidazole distribution. Representative images of (a) pimonidazole and (b) HK-II IHC staining. Typical immunostaining of pimonidazole in (c) Pimo+ and (d) Pimo−. (e) HK-II expression assessed by semiquantitative analysis in Pimo+ and Pimo−. N, necrotic/apoptotic regions.