BACKGROUND: The efficacy of shock in converting different ventricular tachyarrhythmias has not been well characterized in a large natural-practice setting. OBJECTIVE: To determine shock success rate by energy and ventricular rhythm in a large cohort of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. METHODS: Two thousand patients with 5279 shock episodes were randomly sampled for analysis from the LATITUDE remote monitoring system. Within an episode, the rhythm preceding therapy (shock or antitachycardia pacing [ATP]) was adjudicated. Patients who died after unsuccessful implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks did not transmit final remote monitoring data and were not included in the study. RESULTS: Of 3677 shock episodes for ventricular tachyarrhythmia, 2679 were treated with shock initially and were classified as monomorphic ventricular tachycardia ( n = 1544), polymorphic/monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 371), or ventricular fibrillation (n = 764). The success rate after the first, second, and final shock averaged 90.3%, 96.4%, and 99.8%, respectively. After unsuccessful initial ATP (n = 998), the first, second, and final shock was successful in 84.8%, 92.9%, and 100% of the episodes. The success rate after the first or second shock was significantly lower after failed ATP compared to shock as first therapy (both P<.001). Among episodes treated initially with shock, the success rate for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (89.2%) when treated with energy level ≤ 20 J was significantly higher than that for ventricular fibrillation (80.8%) (P = .04). The level of shock energy was a significant predictor of the success of the first shock (odds ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.30; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of first shock as first therapy is approximately 90%, but was lower after failed ATP. Programming a higher level of energy after ATP is suggested.
BACKGROUND: The efficacy of shock in converting different ventricular tachyarrhythmias has not been well characterized in a large natural-practice setting. OBJECTIVE: To determine shock success rate by energy and ventricular rhythm in a large cohort of patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. METHODS: Two thousand patients with 5279 shock episodes were randomly sampled for analysis from the LATITUDE remote monitoring system. Within an episode, the rhythm preceding therapy (shock or antitachycardia pacing [ATP]) was adjudicated. Patients who died after unsuccessful implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shocks did not transmit final remote monitoring data and were not included in the study. RESULTS: Of 3677 shock episodes for ventricular tachyarrhythmia, 2679 were treated with shock initially and were classified as monomorphic ventricular tachycardia ( n = 1544), polymorphic/monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (n = 371), or ventricular fibrillation (n = 764). The success rate after the first, second, and final shock averaged 90.3%, 96.4%, and 99.8%, respectively. After unsuccessful initial ATP (n = 998), the first, second, and final shock was successful in 84.8%, 92.9%, and 100% of the episodes. The success rate after the first or second shock was significantly lower after failed ATP compared to shock as first therapy (both P<.001). Among episodes treated initially with shock, the success rate for monomorphic ventricular tachycardia (89.2%) when treated with energy level ≤ 20 J was significantly higher than that for ventricular fibrillation (80.8%) (P = .04). The level of shock energy was a significant predictor of the success of the first shock (odds ratio 1.16; 95% confidence interval 1.03-1.30; P = .013). CONCLUSIONS: The success rate of first shock as first therapy is approximately 90%, but was lower after failed ATP. Programming a higher level of energy after ATP is suggested.
Authors: Daniel B Kramer; Susan L Mitchell; Joao Monteiro; Paul W Jones; Sharon-Lise Normand; David L Hayes; Matthew R Reynolds Journal: J Am Heart Assoc Date: 2015-05-15 Impact factor: 5.501
Authors: Angel Arenal; Alessandro Proclemer; Axel Kloppe; Maurizio Lunati; José Bautista Martìnez Ferrer; Ahmad Hersi; Marcin Gulaj; Maurits C E F Wijffels; Elisabetta Santi; Laura Manotta; Lorenza Mangoni; Maurizio Gasparini Journal: Europace Date: 2016-08-02 Impact factor: 5.214