| Literature DB >> 23335995 |
Tao Zeng1, Fang-Fang Guo, Cui-Li Zhang, Fu-Yong Song, Xiu-Lan Zhao, Ke-Qin Xie.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Previous studies investigating the association between cytochrome P4502E1 (CYP2E1) polymorphisms and the risk of alcoholic liver diseases (ALD) have yielded conflicting results. Thus, a meta-analysis was performed to clarify the association between CYP2E1 polymorphisms and the risks of ALD.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2013 PMID: 23335995 PMCID: PMC3545986 DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0054188
Source DB: PubMed Journal: PLoS One ISSN: 1932-6203 Impact factor: 3.240
Figure 1Flow chart of study selection based on the inclusion and exclusion criteria.
Characteristics of individual studies for association between CYP2E1 Pst I/Rsa I polymorphisms and ALD risks.
| Study | Country | Age | Sex | Type of ALD | Cases | Alcoholics without ALD | Non-alcoholics |
| ||||||
| c1c1 | c1c2 | c2c2 | c1c1 | c1c2 | c2c2 | c1c1 | c1c2 | c2c2 | ||||||
| Liu,2012 | China | 51/na/na | Both | AC/AH/AFL/HCC | 203 | 106 | 44 | 271 | 19 | 10 | 325 | 24 | 11 | 0.000 |
| Garcia-Banuelos,2012 | Mexico | 44/42 | Both | AC | 25 | 16 | 0 | 73 | 15 | 2 | 0.266 | |||
| Khan,2010 | India | 52/48/42 | na | AC | 161 | 14 | 0 | 137 | 3 | 0 | 250 | 5 | 0 | 0.874 |
| Lorenzo,2006 | Spain | 55/54/48 | Female | AC/AH/AFL | 53 | 2 | 3 | 27 | 0 | 0 | 40 | 2 | 0 | 0.874 |
| Cichoz-Lach,2006 | Poland | 50/44/51 | Both | AC | 53 | 4 | 0 | 43 | 0 | 0 | 54 | 0 | 0 | na |
| Vidal,2004 | Spain | 53/57/46 | Male | AC/AH/AFL | 94 | 5 | 0 | 42 | 4 | 1 | 57 | 7 | 0 | 0.644 |
| Kim,2004 | Korea | 49/49 | Both | AC | 17 | 4 | 0 | 51 | 34 | 15 | 0.029 | |||
| Burim,2004 | Brazil | 18–76 | Both | AC | 59 | 6 | 0 | 37 | 4 | 0 | 197 | 23 | 1 | 0.712 |
| Kee,2003 | Korea | na | na | AC | 17 | 10 | 3 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 23 | 15 | 0 | 0.130 |
| Frenzer,2002 | Australia | 58/42/50 | Both | AC | 56 | 1 | 0 | 54 | 3 | 0 | 188 | 12 | 0 | 0.662 |
| Monzoni,2001 | Italy | 58/58 | Both | AC/AH/AFL | 66 | 14 | 1 | 85 | 7 | 0 | na | |||
| Lee,2001 | Korea | 52/52/50 | Male | AC | 34 | 21 | 1 | 32 | 19 | 1 | 41 | 22 | 1 | 0.305 |
| Zhang,2000 | China | 52.3 | Male | AC/AH/HCC | 2 | 50 | 3 | 17 | 9 | 0 | 0.286 | |||
| Wong,2000 | UK | 18–90 | Both | AH/AF/AC | 59 | 2 | 0 | 350 | 25 | 0 | 0.504 | |||
| Rodrigo,1999 | Spain | 55/60/45 | Male | AC | 112 | 8 | 0 | 28 | 2 | 0 | 183 | 17 | 0 | 0.530 |
| Parsian,1998 | USA | na | Both | AC | na | |||||||||
| Grove,1998 | UK | na | Both | AC/AF/AH | 226 | 14 | 0 | 117 | 4 | 0 | 0.853 | |||
| Tanaka,1997 | Japan | 49/- | Male | AC/AF/AH | 13 | 9 | 4 | 30 | 11 | 1 | na | |||
| Chao,1997 | China | 51/50/22 | Both | AC | 42 | 29 | 4 | 12 | 5 | 2 | 56 | 38 | 6 | 0.894 |
| Lucas,1996 | France | 55/44/(20–50) | na | AC | 101 | 9 | 0 | 188 | 12 | 2 | 248 | 11 | 1 | 0.033 |
| Carr,1996 | China | 55/40/20 | na | AC | 18 | 10 | 2 | 28 | 18 | 0 | 52 | 45 | 3 | 0.065 |
| Agundez,1996 | Spain | 54/32 | Both | AC | 56 | 2 | 0 | 130 | 7 | 0 | 0.789 | |||
| Yamauch,1995 | Japan | (38–70)/- | Male | AC | 34 | 12 | 0 | 40 | 18 | 2 | 0.989 | |||
| Pirmohamed,1995 | UK | na | Both | AC/AH | 77 | 17 | 1 | 55 | 2 | 1 | 97 | 3 | 0 | 0.879 |
| Carr,1995 | USA | (33–72)/-/- | Male | AC/AH | 49 | 3 | 1 | 35 | 4 | 0 | 31 | 1 | 0 | 0.929 |
| Ball,1995 | UK | na | na | AC | 34 | 3 | 0 | 102 | 6 | 0 | 0.767 | |||
| Ingelman-Sundberg,1993 | Italy | na | na | AC | 53 | 30 | 0 | 104 | 10 | 0 | 0.624 | |||
Abbreviations: ALD, alcoholic liver disease; AC, alcoholic cirrhosis; AH, alcoholic hepatisis; AFL, alcoholic fatty liver; AF, alcoholic fibrosis; HCC, hepatic carcinoma.
the study by Parsian did not provide the number of each genotypes, instead they provided the number of alleles of case and controls;
the mean age and/or the range of age of each groups;
cases and controls combined;
p for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test in controls (Healthy person);
“na“, means that the data were not available.
Characteristics of individual studies for association between CYP2E1 Dra I polymorphisms and ALD risks.
| Study | Country | Age | Sex | Type ofALD | Cases | Alcoholics without ALD | Non-alcoholics |
| ||||||
| d2d2 | d2d1 | d1d1 | d2d2 | d2d1 | d1d1 | d2d2 | d2d1 | d1d1 | ||||||
| Khan,2009 | India | 52/49/42 | na | AC | 118 | 42 | 0 | 67 | 33 | 0 | 182 | 68 | 0 | 0.013 |
| Lorenzo,2006 | Spain | 55/54/48 | Female | AC/AH/AFL | 36 | 22 | 0 | 18 | 9 | 0 | 34 | 8 | 0 | 0.495 |
| Vidal,2004 | Spain | 53/57/46 | Male | AC/AH/AFL | 75 | 23 | 1 | 36 | 11 | 0 | 45 | 18 | 1 | 0.594 |
| Frenzer,2002 | Australia | 58/42/50 | Both | AC | 48 | 9 | 0 | 46 | 10 | 1 | 170 | 28 | 2 | 0.489 |
| Wong,2000 | UK | 18–90 | Both | AH/AF/AC | 50 | 11 | 0 | 305 | 68 | 2 | 0.386 | |||
| Parsian,1998 | USA | na | Both | AC | na | |||||||||
| Savolainen,1997 | Finland | 35–69 | Male | AH/AF/AC | 156 | 48 | 3 | 30 | 6 | 0 | na | |||
| Lucas,1996 | France | 55/44/(20–50) | na | AC | 79 | 30 | 1 | 149 | 49 | 4 | 219 | 37 | 2 | 0.752 |
| Ingelman-Sundberg,1993 | Italy | na | na | AC | 47 | 4 | 0 | 95 | 19 | 0 | 0.332 | |||
Abbreviations: ALD, alcoholic liver disease; AC, alcoholic cirrhosis; AH, alcoholic hepatisis; AFL, alcoholic fatty liver; AF, alcoholic fibrosis; HCC, hepatic carcinoma.
the study by Parsian did not provide the number of each genotypes, instead they provided the number of alleles of case and controls;
the mean age and/or the range of age of each groups;
cases and controls combined;
p for Hardy–Weinberg equilibrium test in controls (Healthy person);
“na“, means that the data were not available.
Figure 2Meta-analysis for CYP2E1 Pst I/Rsa I polymorphism and the risk of ALD (allele c2 vs. c1).
(a) ALD patients vs. alcoholics without ALD; (b) ALD patients vs. non-alcoholics. Each study was shown by a point estimate of the effect size (OR) (size inversely proportional to its variance) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) (horizontal lines). The white diamond denotes the pooled OR.
Figure 3Frequencies of the minor allele (c2 allele) of the CYP2E1 Pst I/Rsa I polymorphism among control subjects stratified by ethnicity.
Figure 4Meta-analysis for CYP2E1 Dra I polymorphism and the risk of ALD in Caucasians (d1 vs. d2).
(a) ALD patients vs. alcoholics without ALD; (b) ALD patients vs. non-alcoholics. Each study was shown by a point estimate of the effect size (OR) (size inversely proportional to its variance) and its 95% confidence interval (95%CI) (horizontal lines). The white diamond denotes the pooled OR.