| Literature DB >> 23335917 |
Axel Durand1, Zanna Chase, Tomas Remenyi, Fabien Quéroué.
Abstract
We have developed a method for the determination of copper in natural waters at nanomolar levels. The use of a microplate-reader minimizes sample processing time (~25 s per sample), reagent consumption (~120 μL per sample), and sample volume (~700 μL). Copper is detected by chemiluminescence. This technique is based on the formation of a complex between copper and 1,10-phenanthroline and the subsequent emission of light during the oxidation of the complex by hydrogen peroxide. Samples are acidified to pH 1.7 and then introduced directly into a 24-well plate. Reagents are added during data acquisition via two reagent injectors. When trace metal clean protocols are employed, the reproducibility is generally less than 7% on blanks and the detection limit is 0.7 nM for seawater and 0.4 nM for freshwater. More than 100 samples per hour can be analyzed with this technique, which is simple, robust, and amenable to at-sea analysis. Seawater samples from Storm Bay in Tasmania illustrate the utility of the method for environmental science. Indeed other trace metals for which optical detection methods exist (e.g., chemiluminescence, fluorescence, and absorbance) could be adapted to the microplate-reader.Entities:
Keywords: 1,10-phenanthroline; chemiluminescence; copper detection; microplate-reader; seawater
Year: 2013 PMID: 23335917 PMCID: PMC3547493 DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2012.00437
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Microbiol ISSN: 1664-302X Impact factor: 5.640
Figure 1Reproducibility on 21 replicates analyzed in a 24-well plate for 50 nM seawater consistency standard and seawater blanks.
Figure 2Calibration curves in seawater and freshwater with CASS-5 reference for seawater.
Reagent and sample volumes used in the experiment to optimize reagent concentrations and volumes.
| 130 | 700 | 30 | 1.3 | 0.18 | 24 |
| 200 | 700 | 20 | 1.3 | 0.12 | 24 |
| 400 | 700 | 10 | 1.3 | 0.06 | 24 |
| 450 | 700 | 5 | 0.75 | 0.03 | 13 |
The amount of substance of each reagent stays constant in the well by adjusting the volume and concentration injected.
Figure 3Reagent volume vs. signal intensity to test the optimum reagent concentration and volume. Sample volume was held constant. As reagent volume was adjusted so too were reagent concentrations, in order to maintain a constant amount of each reagent in the cell. See Table 1 for details.
Figure 4Volume of reagents injected vs. signal intensity for a constant sample volume and a constant reagent concentration (R1 30% H.
Figure 5Signal intensity as a function of detection time. Each data point represents the average and standard deviation of 4 replicates analyzed after the time indicated. Thus four samples were analyzed after 5 s, another four after 10 s and so on.
Figure 6Signal intensity vs. irradiation time for a 20 nM coastal seawater standard. Each point represents the mean and standard deviation of four subsamples independently irradiated and analyzed.
Figure 7Copper concentrations in Storm Bay, concentrations are given in nM. Concentrations starting from the north east and moving south and east are 1.37 ± 0.4; 3.26 ± 0.7; 4.25 ± 0.8; 3.18 ± 1; 6.18 ± 0.4; 0.39 ± 0.1.