Literature DB >> 23335343

Cementation of a dual-mobility acetabular component into a well-fixed metal shell during revision total hip arthroplasty: a biomechanical validation.

Julien Wegrzyn1, Andrew R Thoreson, Olivier Guyen, David G Lewallen, Kai-Nan An.   

Abstract

Cementation of polyethylene (PE) liners into well-fixed metal shells has become a popular option during revision total hip arthroplasty (THA) particularly for older and frail patients. Although dramatic results were reported with dual-mobility acetabular components to manage hip instability during revision THA, no study evaluated the fixation strength of the cementation of dual-mobility components into well-fixed metal shells. Eight dual-mobility and eight all-PE components were cemented into a metal shell with a uniform 2- to 3-mm cement mantle. The cemented fixation strength was evaluated using lever-out and torsion testing. The interface at which failure occurred was determined. Lever-out testing showed that dual-mobility components failed at significantly higher maximum moment than the all-PE components. No direct comparison could be performed with torsion testing due to early failure of the all-PE component itself before failure of the cement fixation. However, the maximum moments measured were dramatically higher than the in vivo frictional moments classically reported in THA. In addition, failure was always observed at the metal shell/cement interface whenever it did occur. In conclusion, a dual-mobility acetabular component cemented into a well-fixed metal shell could constitute a biomechanically acceptable alternative to acetabular shell removal or PE liner cementation while simultaneously preventing instability of the THA revision. Clinical studies are warranted.
Copyright © 2013 Orthopaedic Research Society.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23335343     DOI: 10.1002/jor.22314

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Orthop Res        ISSN: 0736-0266            Impact factor:   3.494


  6 in total

1.  All dual mobility cups are not the same.

Authors:  Thierry Aslanian
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2017-01-18       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  [Partial or full component exchange in hip revision? : The relevance of off-label use and mix & match].

Authors:  K P Günther; K Tucker; P Kjaersgaard-Andersen; J Lützner; J P Kretzer; R Nelissen; T Lange; L Zagra
Journal:  Orthopadie (Heidelb)       Date:  2022-06-27

3.  The efficacy of dual-mobility cup in preventing dislocation after total hip arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis of comparative studies.

Authors:  Matteo Romagnoli; Alberto Grassi; Giuseppe Gianluca Costa; Lionel E Lazaro; Mirco Lo Presti; Stefano Zaffagnini
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2018-07-21       Impact factor: 3.075

4.  Revision of Metal-on-metal Hip Arthroplasty with Well Fixed and Positioned Acetabular Component Using a Dual-mobility Head and Review of Literature.

Authors:  Guillem Figueras; Ramón Vives Planell; Ramón Serra Fernàndez; Joan Camí Biayna
Journal:  Open Orthop J       Date:  2016-10-31

5.  Cementation of a monoblock dual mobility bearing in a newly implanted porous revision acetabular component in patients undergoing revision total hip arthroplasty.

Authors:  Jonathan A Gabor; James E Feng; Shashank Gupta; Tyler E Calkins; Craig J Della Valle; Jonathan Vigdorchik; Ran Schwarzkopf
Journal:  Arthroplast Today       Date:  2019-06-14

Review 6.  EFORT recommendations for off-label use, mix & match and mismatch in hip and knee arthroplasty.

Authors:  Keith Tucker; Klaus-Peter Günther; Per Kjaersgaard-Andersen; Jörg Lützner; Jan Philippe Kretzer; Rob G H H Nelissen; Toni Lange; Luigi Zagra
Journal:  EFORT Open Rev       Date:  2021-11-19
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.