OBJECTIVES: To determine the mechanisms of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics in clinical isolates of Haemophilus parainfluenzae. METHODS: Twenty clinical isolates of H. parainfluenzae with decreased susceptibility to aminopenicillins were examined and compared with a control group of 20 fully susceptible isolates. In this collection, the presence of amino acid substitutions in the transpeptidase domain of penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3), β-lactamase production and the surrounding genetic regions of blaTEM genes in selected isolates were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 20 non-susceptible isolates, 8 produced TEM β-lactamase (gBLPAR), 7 had mutations in the transpeptidase domain of the ftsI gene related to decreased susceptibility to β-lactams (gBLNAR) and 5 had both resistance mechanisms (gBLPACR). No resistance mechanisms were identified in the susceptible control group (gBLNAS). gBLNAR isolates had MIC90 values 4- to 16-fold higher than gBLNAS isolates for ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cefotaxime and cefixime, and the most common PBP3 mutation was Asn526Ser. The additional Ser385Thr substitution (III-like group) may confer decreased susceptibility to cefotaxime, cefixime and aztreonam, as in Haemophilus influenzae. In two β-lactamase-positive isolates without PBP3 mutations, the inhibitor-resistant TEM (IRT) β-lactamases TEM-34 and the novel TEM-182 were detected and carried by a TnA transposon of the Tn2 type; both isolates had an amoxicillin/clavulanic acid MIC of ≥8 mg/L. The TnA transposons of two β-lactamase-positive isolates (TEM-1 and TEM-182) were inserted between the tfc20 and tfc21 genes, typically associated with integrative and conjugative elements in Haemophilus spp.; the TEM-34 IRT β-lactamase was harboured in a ∼5.5 kb plasmid. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical isolates of H. parainfluenzae express a variety of aminopenicillin resistance mechanisms, either alone or in combination, including PBP3 modifications, blaTEM-1 and IRT β-lactamase production.
OBJECTIVES: To determine the mechanisms of resistance to β-lactam antibiotics in clinical isolates of Haemophilus parainfluenzae. METHODS: Twenty clinical isolates of H. parainfluenzae with decreased susceptibility to aminopenicillins were examined and compared with a control group of 20 fully susceptible isolates. In this collection, the presence of amino acid substitutions in the transpeptidase domain of penicillin-binding protein 3 (PBP3), β-lactamase production and the surrounding genetic regions of blaTEM genes in selected isolates were analysed. RESULTS: Of the 20 non-susceptible isolates, 8 produced TEM β-lactamase (gBLPAR), 7 had mutations in the transpeptidase domain of the ftsI gene related to decreased susceptibility to β-lactams (gBLNAR) and 5 had both resistance mechanisms (gBLPACR). No resistance mechanisms were identified in the susceptible control group (gBLNAS). gBLNAR isolates had MIC90 values 4- to 16-fold higher than gBLNAS isolates for ampicillin, amoxicillin/clavulanic acid, cefuroxime, cefotaxime and cefixime, and the most common PBP3 mutation was Asn526Ser. The additional Ser385Thr substitution (III-like group) may confer decreased susceptibility to cefotaxime, cefixime and aztreonam, as in Haemophilus influenzae. In two β-lactamase-positive isolates without PBP3 mutations, the inhibitor-resistant TEM (IRT) β-lactamases TEM-34 and the novel TEM-182 were detected and carried by a TnA transposon of the Tn2 type; both isolates had an amoxicillin/clavulanic acid MIC of ≥8 mg/L. The TnA transposons of two β-lactamase-positive isolates (TEM-1 and TEM-182) were inserted between the tfc20 and tfc21 genes, typically associated with integrative and conjugative elements in Haemophilus spp.; the TEM-34 IRT β-lactamase was harboured in a ∼5.5 kb plasmid. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical isolates of H. parainfluenzae express a variety of aminopenicillin resistance mechanisms, either alone or in combination, including PBP3 modifications, blaTEM-1 and IRT β-lactamase production.
Authors: Vitaly Grigorenko; Igor Uporov; Maya Rubtsova; Irina Andreeva; Dmitrii Shcherbinin; Alexander Veselovsky; Oksana Serova; Maria Ulyashova; Igor Ishtubaev; Alexey Egorov Journal: FEBS Open Bio Date: 2017-12-11 Impact factor: 2.693