Literature DB >> 23333546

Effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring with additional ST analysis in vertex singleton pregnancies at >36 weeks of gestation: an individual participant data metaanalysis.

Ewoud Schuit1, Isis Amer-Wahlin, Kati Ojala, Christophe Vayssière, Michelle E M H Westerhuis, Karel Maršál, Aydin Tekay, George R Saade, Gerard H A Visser, Rolf H H Groenwold, Karel G M Moons, Ben Willem J Mol, Anneke Kwee.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the effectiveness of electronic fetal monitoring (EFM) alone and with additional ST analysis (EFM + ST) in laboring women with a singleton term pregnancy that is in cephalic presentation in the prevention of metabolic acidosis by the application of individual patient data metaanalysis. STUDY
DESIGN: We conducted an individual patient data metaanalysis using data from 4 randomized trials, which enabled us to account for missing data and investigate relevant subgroups. The primary outcome was metabolic acidosis, which was defined as an umbilical cord-artery pH <7.05 and a base deficit that had been calculated in the extra cellular fluid compartment >12 mmol/L. We performed 8 explanatory subgroup analyses for 8 different endpoints.
RESULTS: We analyzed data from 12,987 women and their newborn infants. Metabolic acidosis was present in 57 women (0.9%) in the EFM + ST group and 73 women (1.1%) in the EFM alone group (relative risk [RR], 0.76; 95% CI, 0.53-1.10). Compared with EFM alone, the use of EFM + ST resulted in a reduction in the frequency of instrumental vaginal deliveries (RR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.99) and fetal blood samples (RR, 0.49; 95% CI, 0.44-0.55). Cesarean delivery rates were comparable between both groups (RR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.91-1.09). Subgroup analyses showed that EFM + ST resulted in fewer admissions to a neonatal intensive care unit for women with a duration of pregnancy of >41 weeks (RR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.39-0.95).
CONCLUSION: EFM + ST does not reduce the risk of metabolic acidosis, but it does reduce the need for instrumental vaginal deliveries and fetal blood sampling.
Copyright © 2013 Mosby, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23333546     DOI: 10.1016/j.ajog.2013.01.028

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0002-9378            Impact factor:   8.661


  8 in total

Review 1.  What we have learned about intrapartum fetal monitoring trials in the MFMU Network.

Authors:  Steven L Bloom; Michael Belfort; George Saade
Journal:  Semin Perinatol       Date:  2016-04-29       Impact factor: 3.300

2.  A Randomized Trial of Intrapartum Fetal ECG ST-Segment Analysis.

Authors:  Michael A Belfort; George R Saade; Elizabeth Thom; Sean C Blackwell; Uma M Reddy; John M Thorp; Alan T N Tita; Russell S Miller; Alan M Peaceman; David S McKenna; Edward K S Chien; Dwight J Rouse; Ronald S Gibbs; Yasser Y El-Sayed; Yoram Sorokin; Steve N Caritis; J Peter VanDorsten
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 91.245

Review 3.  Fetal electrocardiogram (ECG) for fetal monitoring during labour.

Authors:  James P Neilson
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-12-21

Review 4.  A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part I: the randomized controlled trials.

Authors:  Per Olofsson; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Jörg Kessler; Britta Tendal; Branka M Yli; Lawrence Devoe
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.636

Review 5.  A critical appraisal of the evidence for using cardiotocography plus ECG ST interval analysis for fetal surveillance in labor. Part II: the meta-analyses.

Authors:  Per Olofsson; Diogo Ayres-de-Campos; Jörg Kessler; Britta Tendal; Branka M Yli; Lawrence Devoe
Journal:  Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand       Date:  2014-06       Impact factor: 3.636

6.  The electrical heart axis and ST events in fetal monitoring: A post-hoc analysis following a multicentre randomised controlled trial.

Authors:  Rik Vullings; Kim M J Verdurmen; Alexandra D J Hulsenboom; Stephanie Scheffer; Hinke de Lau; Anneke Kwee; Pieter F F Wijn; Isis Amer-Wåhlin; Judith O E H van Laar; S Guid Oei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-04-14       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Relative versus absolute rises in T/QRS ratio by ST analysis of fetal electrocardiograms in labour: A case-control pilot study.

Authors:  Alexandra D J Hulsenboom; Kim M J Verdurmen; Rik Vullings; M Beatrijs van der Hout-van der Jagt; Anneke Kwee; Judith O E H van Laar; S Guid Oei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-03-26       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Feasibility of non-invasive Foetal electrocardiography in a twin pregnancy.

Authors:  Lore Noben; Michelle E M H Westerhuis; Judith O E H van Laar; René D Kok; S Guid Oei; Chris H L Peters; Rik Vullings
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2020-04-15       Impact factor: 3.007

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.