OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of alexithymia in a sample of general chronic pain patients, to explore possible differences in depression and pain variables between alexithymic and nonalexithymic chronic pain patients and to analyze if depression is a mediator between alexithymia and pain disability. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-one patients making their first visit to a pain clinic completed the study questionnaire including various pain measures, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). The sample was dichotomized to alexithymic and nonalexithymic groups. The means of the study variables were compared between the groups. The correlation analysis of the variables was carried out separately in both groups. Path analysis was done to ascertain the mediation effect of BDI-II between the TAS-20 and pain disability. RESULTS: Every fifth chronic pain patient was alexithymic. The BDI-II and pain variable scores were significantly higher in the alexithymic group than in the nonalexithymic group. Pain variables were not associated with alexithymia when BDI-II was controlled for. BDI-II worked as a full mediator between TAS-20 and pain disability. CONCLUSION: The alexithymic patient group was more morbid than the nonalexithymic group. The results suggest that depression is the main factor in pain conditions of alexithymic chronic pain patients. The authors recommend screening and treatment of depression in alexithymic chronic pain patients.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of the present study was to assess the prevalence of alexithymia in a sample of general chronic painpatients, to explore possible differences in depression and pain variables between alexithymic and nonalexithymic chronic painpatients and to analyze if depression is a mediator between alexithymia and pain disability. METHODS: Two hundred and seventy-one patients making their first visit to a pain clinic completed the study questionnaire including various pain measures, the Beck Depression Inventory-II (BDI-II) and the 20-item Toronto Alexithymia Scale (TAS-20). The sample was dichotomized to alexithymic and nonalexithymic groups. The means of the study variables were compared between the groups. The correlation analysis of the variables was carried out separately in both groups. Path analysis was done to ascertain the mediation effect of BDI-II between the TAS-20 and pain disability. RESULTS: Every fifth chronic painpatient was alexithymic. The BDI-II and pain variable scores were significantly higher in the alexithymic group than in the nonalexithymic group. Pain variables were not associated with alexithymia when BDI-II was controlled for. BDI-II worked as a full mediator between TAS-20 and pain disability. CONCLUSION: The alexithymic patient group was more morbid than the nonalexithymic group. The results suggest that depression is the main factor in pain conditions of alexithymic chronic painpatients. The authors recommend screening and treatment of depression in alexithymic chronic painpatients.
Authors: Kimberly L Klages; Marie L Chardon; Sarah N Drake; Kasiani C Myers; Caroline F Morrison; Ahna L H Pai Journal: Pediatr Blood Cancer Date: 2022-06-23 Impact factor: 3.838
Authors: Thomas Probst; Heribert Sattel; Harald Gündel; Peter Henningsen; Johannes Kruse; Gudrun Schneider; Claas Lahmann Journal: Front Psychiatry Date: 2017-12-04 Impact factor: 4.157
Authors: Roberta Lanzara; Chiara Conti; Martina Camelio; Paolo Cannizzaro; Vittorio Lalli; Rosa Grazia Bellomo; Raoul Saggini; Piero Porcelli Journal: Front Psychol Date: 2020-10-27