Literature DB >> 23332297

Determining legal responsibility in otolaryngology: a review of 44 trials since 2008.

Peter F Svider1, Qasim Husain, Olga Kovalerchik, Andrew C Mauro, Michael Setzen, Soly Baredes, Jean Anderson Eloy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: Medicolegal factors contribute to increasing healthcare costs through the direct costs of malpractice litigation, malpractice insurance premiums, and defensive medicine. Malpractice litigation trends are constantly changing as a result of technological innovations and changes in laws. In this study, we examine the most recent legal decisions related to Otolaryngology and characterize the factors responsible for determining legal responsibility.
METHODS: The Westlaw legal database (Thomson Reuters, New York, NY) was used to search for jury verdicts since 2008 in Otolaryngology malpractice cases. The 44 cases included in this analysis were studied to determine the procedures most commonly litigated and progressing to trial, as well as the year, location, alleged cause of malpractice, specialty of co-defendants, and case outcomes.
RESULTS: Out of the 44 cases included in this analysis, physicians were not found liable in 36 (81.8%) cases. Rhinologic procedures comprised 38.6% of cases litigated, and rulings were in physicians' favor in 66.7% of endoscopic sinus surgery (ESS) cases and all non-ESS rhinologic cases. A perceived lack of informed consent was noted in 34.1% of cases. The 8 jury awards averaged $940,000 (range, $148,000-$3,600,000).
CONCLUSION: Otolaryngologists were not found liable in the majority of cases reviewed. Rhinologic surgeries were the most common procedures resulting in litigation. Adenotonsillectomies, thyroidectomies, and airway management are also well-represented. Perceived deficits in informed consent and misdiagnosis were noted in a considerable proportion of otolaryngologic malpractice cases resulting in jury decisions.
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23332297     DOI: 10.1016/j.amjoto.2012.12.005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Otolaryngol        ISSN: 0196-0709            Impact factor:   1.808


  4 in total

1.  Uncovering malpractice in appendectomies: a review of 234 cases.

Authors:  Amad J Choudhry; Seema P Anandalwar; Asad J Choudhry; Peter F Svider; Joseph O Oliver; Jean Anderson Eloy; Ravi J Chokshi
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-08-01       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Medical Malpractice of Vestibular Schwannoma: A 40-Year Review of the United States Legal Databases.

Authors:  Jack Birkenbeuel; Kimberly Vu; Brandon M Lehrich; Mehdi Abouzari; Dillon Cheung; Pooya Khosravi; Ronald Sahyouni; Kasra Ziai; Omid Moshtaghi; Sammy Sahyouni; Hamid R Djalilian
Journal:  Otol Neurotol       Date:  2019-03       Impact factor: 2.311

3.  Medical Malpractice in Bariatric Surgery: a Review of 140 Medicolegal Claims.

Authors:  Asad J Choudhry; Nadeem N Haddad; Matthew Martin; Cornelius A Thiels; Elizabeth B Habermann; Martin D Zielinski
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2016-10-11       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Court decisions on medical malpractice.

Authors:  Jan-Paul Knaak; Markus Parzeller
Journal:  Int J Legal Med       Date:  2014-03-28       Impact factor: 2.686

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.