Literature DB >> 23332079

Quantification of transmembrane currents during action potential propagation in the heart.

Richard A Gray1, David N Mashburn, Veniamin Y Sidorov, John P Wikswo.   

Abstract

The measurement, quantitative analysis, theory, and mathematical modeling of transmembrane potential and currents have been an integral part of the field of electrophysiology since its inception. Biophysical modeling of action potential propagation begins with detailed ionic current models for a patch of membrane within a distributed cable model. Voltage-clamp techniques have revolutionized clinical electrophysiology via the characterization of the transmembrane current gating variables; however, this kinetic information alone is insufficient to accurately represent propagation. Other factors, including channel density, membrane area, surface/volume ratio, axial conductivities, etc., are also crucial determinants of transmembrane currents in multicellular tissue but are extremely difficult to measure. Here, we provide, to our knowledge, a novel analytical approach to compute transmembrane currents directly from experimental data, which involves high-temporal (200 kHz) recordings of intra- and extracellular potential with glass microelectrodes from the epicardial surface of isolated rabbit hearts during propagation. We show for the first time, to our knowledge, that during stable planar propagation the biphasic total transmembrane current (I(m)) dipole density during depolarization was ∼0.25 ms in duration and asymmetric in amplitude (peak outward current was ∼95 μA/cm(2) and peak inward current was ∼140 μA/cm(2)), and the peak inward ionic current (I(ion)) during depolarization was ∼260 μA/cm(2) with duration of ∼1.0 ms. Simulations of stable propagation using the ionic current versus transmembrane potential relationship fit from the experimental data reproduced these values better than traditional ionic models. During ventricular fibrillation, peak I(m) was decreased by 50% and peak I(ion) was decreased by 70%. Our results provide, to our knowledge, novel quantitative information that complements voltage- and patch-clamp data.
Copyright © 2013 Biophysical Society. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2013        PMID: 23332079      PMCID: PMC3540262          DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2012.11.007

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys J        ISSN: 0006-3495            Impact factor:   4.033


  39 in total

1.  Single-channel currents recorded from membrane of denervated frog muscle fibres.

Authors:  E Neher; B Sakmann
Journal:  Nature       Date:  1976-04-29       Impact factor: 49.962

2.  AN ANALYSIS OF THE STRIATED MUSCLE FIBER ACTION CURRENT.

Authors:  H JENERICK
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  1964-03       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Measuring surface potential components necessary for transmembrane current computation using microfabricated arrays.

Authors:  J James Wiley; Raymond E Ideker; William M Smith; Andrew E Pollard
Journal:  Am J Physiol Heart Circ Physiol       Date:  2005-08-05       Impact factor: 4.733

4.  Interdependence of virtual electrode polarization and conduction velocity during premature stimulation.

Authors:  Richard A Gray; Anand Iyer; Omer Berenfeld; Arkady M Pertsov; Chris J Hyatt
Journal:  J Electrocardiol       Date:  2006-10       Impact factor: 1.438

5.  Distilling free-form natural laws from experimental data.

Authors:  Michael Schmidt; Hod Lipson
Journal:  Science       Date:  2009-04-03       Impact factor: 47.728

6.  The electrical constants of a crustacean nerve fibre.

Authors:  A L HODGKIN; W A H RUSHTON
Journal:  Proc R Soc Med       Date:  1946-12-03

7.  Characteristics and distribution of M cells in arterially perfused canine left ventricular wedge preparations.

Authors:  G X Yan; W Shimizu; C Antzelevitch
Journal:  Circulation       Date:  1998-11-03       Impact factor: 29.690

8.  Directional differences in excitability and margin of safety for propagation in sheep ventricular epicardial muscle.

Authors:  C Delgado; B Steinhaus; M Delmar; D R Chialvo; J Jalife
Journal:  Circ Res       Date:  1990-07       Impact factor: 17.367

9.  Re-evaluation of the action potential upstroke velocity as a measure of the Na+ current in cardiac myocytes at physiological conditions.

Authors:  Géza Berecki; Ronald Wilders; Berend de Jonge; Antoni C G van Ginneken; Arie O Verkerk
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-12-31       Impact factor: 3.240

10.  ELECTRIC IMPEDANCE OF THE SQUID GIANT AXON DURING ACTIVITY.

Authors:  K S Cole; H J Curtis
Journal:  J Gen Physiol       Date:  1939-05-20       Impact factor: 4.086

View more
  9 in total

Review 1.  Cardiac action potential repolarization revisited: early repolarization shows all-or-none behaviour.

Authors:  Beatriz Trenor; Karen Cardona; Javier Saiz; Denis Noble; Wayne Giles
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  2017-10-09       Impact factor: 5.182

2.  Transmembrane current imaging in the heart during pacing and fibrillation.

Authors:  Richard A Gray; David N Mashburn; Veniamin Y Sidorov; Bradley J Roth; Pras Pathmanathan; John P Wikswo
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2013-10-01       Impact factor: 4.033

3.  Estimability Analysis and Optimal Design in Dynamic Multi-scale Models of Cardiac Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Matthew S Shotwell; Richard A Gray
Journal:  J Agric Biol Environ Stat       Date:  2016-01-21       Impact factor: 1.524

4.  A Parsimonious Model of the Rabbit Action Potential Elucidates the Minimal Physiological Requirements for Alternans and Spiral Wave Breakup.

Authors:  Richard A Gray; Pras Pathmanathan
Journal:  PLoS Comput Biol       Date:  2016-10-17       Impact factor: 4.475

Review 5.  Validation and Trustworthiness of Multiscale Models of Cardiac Electrophysiology.

Authors:  Pras Pathmanathan; Richard A Gray
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.566

6.  Effect of Heart Structure on Ventricular Fibrillation in the Rabbit: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Suran K Galappaththige; Pras Pathmanathan; Martin J Bishop; Richard A Gray
Journal:  Front Physiol       Date:  2019-05-15       Impact factor: 4.566

7.  New insights on the cardiac safety factor: Unraveling the relationship between conduction velocity and robustness of propagation.

Authors:  Patrick M Boyle; William H Franceschi; Marion Constantin; Claudia Hawks; Thomas Desplantez; Natalia A Trayanova; Edward J Vigmond
Journal:  J Mol Cell Cardiol       Date:  2019-01-22       Impact factor: 5.000

8.  Filament Dynamics during Simulated Ventricular Fibrillation in a High-Resolution Rabbit Heart.

Authors:  Pras Pathmanathan; Richard A Gray
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2015-10-26       Impact factor: 3.411

Review 9.  Organic Bioelectronics: Materials and Biocompatibility.

Authors:  Krishna Feron; Rebecca Lim; Connor Sherwood; Angela Keynes; Alan Brichta; Paul C Dastoor
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-08-13       Impact factor: 5.923

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.